www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

ENCYCLOPINE | OPINION ENCYCLOPEDIA (Wikipedia Plus Subjective Opinions)

Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute

Read on WikipediaTR

Click to disable ads for 1 month.

Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute was a May 29, 2003, decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida which ruled that individuals do not own their tissue samples when researchers take them for testing.

Your Subjective Opinions

General Attitude(Positive or Negative)

Do you think/feel generally positive or negative about Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute?
Click for partially positive
overall0
Click for partially negative
Which adjectives are appropriate for Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute?
I think that
Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute is .
important0
precious0
successful0
powerful0
attractive0
beautiful0
cute0
dark0
elegant0
gorgeous0
magnificent0
plain0
ugly0
annoying0
crazy0
odd0
awful0
evil0
calm0
enchanting0
funny0
gentle0
lively0
lovely0
perfect0
wonderful0
warm0
interesting0

Please do not hesitate to write your subjective opinions which can not be in wikipedia but may be useful for other visitors of this article.
Do you have anything to say about Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute? (You don't have to register to write a comment, you can write as anonymous.)


EDIT

Click to disable ads for 1 month.

Click to disable ads for 1 month.

History[edit]

The plaintiffs in this case were a group of parents of children who had Canavan disease and three non-profit organizations who developed a confidential Canavan disease registry and database.[1] The parents provided their children's tissue for research on the disease and the non-profit groups aided in the identification of other affected families.[1] The defendant was Reuben Matalon, who received these tissue samples and used them to isolate and patent the Canavan gene sequence.[1] He subsequently developed a genetic screening test for it and began claiming royalties whenever the test was used.[1] The Miami facilities where he did his research, including Miami Children's Hospital, were also defendants.[1]

Decision[edit]

The court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims that the defendants did not provide informed consent, conducted a breach of fiduciary duties, concealed the patent, and misappropriated trade secrets.[1] The court did uphold the plaintiffs' claim of unjust enrichment at the expense of the donors of tissue, writing that "the facts paint a picture of a continuing research collaboration that involved plaintiffs also investing time and significant resources."[1]

Significance[edit]

The case set a precedent for determining ownership of donated tissue samples.[2][3]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g United States District Court, S. D. F. (2003). "Greenberg v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute". West's federal supplement 264: 1064–1078. PMID 15776537.  edit
  2. ^ Evans, Paula C. (3 October 2006). "Patent Rights in Biological Material". ipfrontline.com. Retrieved 25 November 2011. 
  3. ^ Waxman, J. Mark (1 December 2007). "Who Owns My Tissue?". dddmag.com. Retrieved 25 November 2011. 

External links[edit]


Click to disable ads for 1 month.
web analytics
Quantcast