www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Coming Out of the Fertility Closet

How Jimmy Fallon is helping infertile couples across America

Jimmy Fallon and his wife, Nancy Juvonen, at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, May 7, 2012. Fallon says he and his wife had their baby daughter with the help of a surrogate.
Evan Agostini / AP

Talk-show host Jimmy Fallon and his wife Nancy Juvonen at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City on May 7, 2012

Although 1 in 6 U.S. couples faces problems conceiving, many still feel funny telling others that they are undergoing treatment. In fact, infertility is one of the last great cultural taboos. One survey of infertile couples conducted by the pharmaceutical companies Schering-Plough and Merck found that 61% hid their infertility from family and friends, and half didn’t share it with their mothers. Why the secrecy? The study also found that 7 in 10 women admitted that being infertile made them feel “flawed” and half of men reported feeling “inadequate.”

It’s no wonder then that talk-show host Jimmy Fallon waited two weeks after the birth of his daughter Winnie Rose to reveal that she was carried by a surrogate. “My wife and I had been trying for a while to have a baby,” Fallon told Today’s Savannah Guthrie on Friday morning. “We tried a bunch of things. So we had a surrogate.”

Fallon’s openness came as a surprise, considering that most celebrities have been notoriously mum on the subject. Who can blame them? Remember all the rampant speculating about whether Kate Middleton had infertility problems? And — gasp! — was Baby George conceived via IVF?

(MORE: Having It All Without Having Children)

To date, Hollywood stars having baby-making troubles haven’t received much public sympathy, amid criticism of being able to “buy” their way out of fertility problems with expensive medical help that many Americans can’t afford.

But the narrative turns extra nasty when other people’s reproductive parts, such as rented wombs or donor eggs, are involved. When actresses Sarah Jessica Parker and Nicole Kidman revealed they had used surrogates, they were accused of hiring these other women in order to spare their own bodies from the ravages of pregnancy — as if these women chose this route for cosmetic reasons, when both had publicly shared their battles with infertility.

And woe to the woman who becomes pregnant using eggs donated by another woman because her own eggs were too old or poor quality. She’s frequently called “selfish” and accused of pushing the boundaries of older motherhood. Instead of praising the third parties and doctors who make such miracles possible, we attack women for putting their careers first and waiting too long to have babies.

(MORE: My Sister, My Surrogate: After Battling Cancer, One Woman Receives the Ultimate Mother’s Day Gift)

We should applaud Fallon — along with his wife and other high-profile women willing to share their stories — for going public with facts so many would prefer to keep hidden.

While celebrities take a lot of flak for exposing their private lives, these are important gestures of support to all the families who are suffering in silence. Such honesty is also welcomed by fertility doctors who struggle to educate patients about the challenges of getting pregnant in your 40s, when popular culture makes it look so easy. Many Hollywood actresses, they explain, became pregnant using donor eggs. Hopefully, one day, the stars will feel comfortable telling us that fact themselves.

What’s more, these announcements go a long way in changing the public perception that infertility is a source of shame. In 2011, Redbook magazine and RESOLVE, a national infertility-education group, launched an online video campaign called “The Truth About Trying” to chip away at the stigma. “It’s crazy to me that this topic is still taboo,” Rosie Pope, star of Bravo’s Pregnant in Heels said in her video. “In Hollywood, you can talk about your drug addiction or divorce, but not infertility.” Perhaps that’s starting to change.

Richards is a health-and-science journalist and the author of Motherhood, Rescheduled: The New Frontier of Egg Freezing and the Women Who Tried It.

15 comments
pendragon05
pendragon05

Because according to Fallon, humans should breed like rabbits. As if they aren't already doing so. Someone call the Duggars...they ain't making enough baybeez

Wisconsinmom
Wisconsinmom

To me, it is not so much taboo to talk about the cruel fate of infertility but rather the morality of the solutions offered to infertile couples. Surrogates and IVF are pushed as appropriate means to an end. Yet they are rift with questions of morality. I would prefer the medical establishment focus on curing the underlying ailment of infertility rather than justifying any means to acheive pregnancy.

rpearlston
rpearlston like.author.displayName 1 Like

@WisconsinmomFurther, there is no one cause of infertility.  That alone makes it impossible to"the underlying ailment of infertility rather than justifying any means to achieve pregnancy".  

Now, please explain to us why it is that you think that no one is researching the many causes of infertility, in both men and women.  It's only when a cause, ANY cause of any particular problem has been identified that the work to treat it, and then to prevent it (which may not always be possible), let alone cure it.
The morality of any given procedure is your to determine, but ONLY when it involves yourself and your partner.  

rpearlston
rpearlston like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Wisconsinmom Surrogates and IVF are last-ditch attempts to help infertile couples.  They are not the first line of treatment, unless one partner is known to be physically incapable of reproduction.  That would include some men who have had serious spinal cord injuries as well as women whose have a damaged or missing portion of their reproductive system.  But those are exceptions.

Further, it's not up to you or to any other individual to judge any part of this.  If you don't approve of it personally, so be it.  But you can't make that decision for others, and you ought not to even try.

amaproject
amaproject like.author.displayName 1 Like

Openess and the ability to share an infertility journey are especially therapeutic. I waited to share my experience with secondary infertulity and encourage other couples to do so while they are experiencing it, finding new resources and ideas for coping. My website for sharing among women, focused on those ages 35+ is http://advancedmaternalage.org. I have three children ages 6 and under, all who came into my life after age 40.


Raggedhand
Raggedhand

"And woe to the woman who becomes pregnant using eggs donated by another woman because her own eggs were too old or poor quality. She’s frequently called “selfish,” and accused of pushing the boundaries of older motherhood."

Well, yes. If you wait too long you're not only risking more birth defects at the beginning, but you're also risking not being there at the end. A woman who waits until after menopause to give birth (at around age 50) is saying that they don't need to be available when their kid hits 20 because even with longer lives, 70 is still old.  I think there is something selfish in creating children you don't plan to support even when they are moving to adulthood and even if the support is simply being there.  

What's really selfish are those who have kids late in life and then use those young people to support THEM as they fade into dementia.  It's one thing for a person (like I have done) my age (55) to deal with a 75 year old alzheimer's patient, but to wish that burden on a 20 year old is appalling. My daughter is dating a young man (age 21) who is now responsible for a 75 year old female dementia patient. She healthy, but demented and can live another 10 years. It will ruin his life. People don't think of that when they have late babies.



Piers
Piers

@Raggedhand For me it was better to wait because I was a hothead when I was young and am much calmer, and wiser, than when I was when I was young.  And I found my wife late.

Our child is well adjusted and  she will do fine, and some of it is because that she doesn't have an quick tempered father that she is really really scared of like the way I did.

But I can understand your point since you are caring for a 75 year old Alzheimer's patient.

If it happens to me or if I get any other kind of illness where I would need a lot of care then I'll move to overseas somewhere labor is cheap, therefore care is cheap, and I'll keep in touch for as long as my weakening mind permits via some internet technology.  But I pray that I won't wind up a burden on anyone.

rpearlston
rpearlston

@Piers @Raggedhand The last thing that you want, at any age, or for any reason, is cheap labor.  Remember that there are 2 meaning to the word cheap.  You get what you pay for, and when you pay next to nothing, that's what you get.

dakinsky
dakinsky

Money buys it all.

mrspotts66
mrspotts66 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@dakinsky and it's attitudes like this that KEEP any talk of infertility taboo.  i hope you re-read this article and rethink what you just typed.

dakinsky
dakinsky

@mrspotts66
 Excuse me, I felt reminded of Madonna in Malawi. So to be more precise, £12 million (~ USD 18 million) buy it.



rpearlston
rpearlston like.author.displayName 1 Like

@dakinsky @mrspotts66 And one person makes that a rule rather than an exception?  That's a part of the point of this article, so please, do reread it and allow yourself to come to your senses.