Temporary Disabled. :) please Go back Understanding HIV and AIDS Statistics www.fgks.org » Address: [go: up one dir, main page] Include Form Remove Scripts Accept Cookies Show Images Show Referer Rotate13 Base64 Strip Meta Strip Title Session Cookies International HIV & AIDS charity DonateFundraising About Us Our Partners Help & Advice Contact Us Facebook Linked in Twitter Newsletter Copyright © AVERT skip to menu Understanding HIV and AIDS Statistics back to top Understanding the HIV and AIDS epidemics An HIV/AIDS epidemic is defined by the HIV prevalence in the general population, which is the percentage of the population living with HIV. An epidemic is either generalised (HIV prevalence is 1% or more in the general population), concentrated (HIV prevalence is below 1% in the general population but exceeds 5% in specific at-risk populations like injecting drug users or sex workers) or low level (HIV prevalence is not recorded at a significant level in any group).1 In order to understand the epidemics of HIV that are spreading around the world, and the AIDS epidemics which follow, it is necessary to look at certain figures. The figures we need include the number of people living with HIV (the HIV prevalence), the number of new infections (the HIV incidence), and the number of people who have died of AIDS. There has been a lot of study into the medical and social aspects of the world's epidemics, which has generated a great deal of data. This information is often presented as long numbers, graphs and tables, and sometimes the terminology used can be quite technical. In order to turn such information into an understanding of the epidemics, we need to know where the data come from and what they really mean. There are two main types of national HIV and AIDS statistics: Reports of actual cases tell us the minimum number of people who are affected, but are of limited use if many cases go unreported. Estimates based on surveys give the proportion of people living with HIV, as well as other statistics, according to certain assumptions. back to top Reported HIV diagnoses With reported diagnoses, each number indicates an actual positive result for a person's HIV test. This method of looking at an epidemic can give an extremely clear picture in terms of real people who have been affected by the virus, especially when looking at smaller areas. However, it is often not a reliable way of assessing wider trends because many people living with HIV have never taken an HIV test, and not all diagnoses are reported. In general, national totals of reported HIV diagnoses are only really useful when they come from places with well-developed voluntary testing schemes, such as the USA, Western Europe, Canada or Australia. However, even in these countries, there are significant numbers of people who have never taken a test and remained undiagnosed. For example, in the United Kingdom it is estimated that 1 in 4 people who are living with HIV do not know they are infected as they have not been diagnosed.2 In the United States, 1 in 5 people infected are unaware of their HIV positive status.3 Some states of the USA do not report any HIV statistics through the name-based system used to compile national surveillance reports. Another point to remember is that looking at the years in which people tested HIV positive does not tell you when they were infected - the test itself may come many years after infection occurred. And when looking at HIV reports, it's important to keep in mind that there might be more than one reason for trends in the data. An increase in diagnoses might not mean that more people are becoming infected with HIV than in previous years - it might mean, instead, that HIV testing has become more easily available than in recent years, or that stigmatisation of people living with HIV has declined, so more people are willing to be tested. In terms of characteristics (such as age, gender, race, etc), HIV reports are not necessarily entirely representative of all HIV infections because some groups of people may be more likely to be tested than others. It is worth remembering this limitation when interpreting reported statistics by exposure category in particular. Reports from the most recent years are usually affected by reporting delays (see Glossary, below). back to top Reported AIDS diagnoses and AIDS deaths Most countries have a long history of reporting AIDS cases and in many places - including the USA, Canada and much of Africa - reporting of all diagnoses is compulsory. A problem with AIDS case reporting is that different countries have different definitions of what actually constitutes AIDS. While a definition of AIDS is becoming standardised, there is still the problem that some resource-poor areas lack HIV testing facilities, and therefore have to diagnose AIDS on the basis of symptoms alone. Another problem is that people with AIDS do not commonly have this disease for long - it either kills them or, given access to antiretroviral medication, they frequently cease to have symptoms. If someone is thought to have died from AIDS then this should be recorded on their death certificate. However, it is acknowledged that such records are less reliable in countries where AIDS is highly stigmatised, because doctors are sometimes inclined to spare shame to a family by mis-recording the cause of an AIDS death. The World Health Organisation says of AIDS case surveillance that, "While giving a general idea of the increase of AIDS in a population, the figures do not reflect the actual prevalence of AIDS disease so much as the accuracy of detection, diagnosis and reporting of the disease syndrome". The proportion of AIDS cases reported varies from less than 10% in some countries to almost 90% in others.4 back to top Estimated HIV prevalence 'HIV prevalence' is given as a percentage of a population. If a thousand truck drivers, for example, are tested for HIV and 30 of them are found to be positive, then the results of a study might say that HIV prevalence amongst truck drivers is 3%. For the purpose of producing a national or international HIV prevalence figure, researchers include all people with HIV infection who are alive at a given point in time, whether or not they have progressed to AIDS. In most cases, HIV prevalence cannot be accurately determined from reported cases because many infections are undiagnosed or unreported. The best estimates are mainly based on the results of surveys of large groups of people. In a country with a generalised epidemic (a high level of infection in the whole population), the national estimate of HIV prevalence is usually mainly based on surveys of pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. Because antenatal clinics are well-attended in most such countries, these data provide a good basis for comparisons; they are also very reliable indicators of trends in prevalence. Surveys collect blood over a short period from all women attending a clinic for the first time (to avoid duplication). All identifying details are removed from the samples, except age group and location of clinic, before they are screened for HIV to determine prevalence. Many studies have shown that HIV prevalence among pregnant women attending clinics is generally very similar to prevalence in the adult population as a whole. Often some small adjustments are made - for example to compensate for under-reporting in the most rural areas, or for large differences between male and female rates of infection. Such refinements are made according to the findings of separate surveys of the general population. Population based surveys are useful because they tell us how prevalence varies according to gender, race or other characteristics, but they are usually not the main source of national prevalence estimates. One reason for this is that population based surveys are much more complicated and expensive than antenatal surveys. Nevertheless, population based surveys are becoming more frequent, and their influence on national HIV prevalence estimates is increasing. Between 2001 and 2007, thirty countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Caribbean conducted national population based surveys. The results of these surveys have led to significant revisions of HIV prevalence estimates for several countries - most notably India in 2007. In a country with a low-level or concentrated epidemic (where high levels of infection are found only in specific groups), the national estimate of HIV prevalence is mainly based on data collected from populations most at risk - usually sex workers, injecting drug users or men who have sex with men - and on estimates of the sizes of the populations at high risk and at low risk. Reports of HIV diagnoses and AIDS deaths may also be taken into account. Better understanding of the nature of an HIV epidemic allows better prevalence estimates to be produced. This is why, each year when a new set of estimates is brought out, the figures for previous years may change. back to top Estimated HIV incidence 'HIV incidence' is the number of new HIV infections in the population during a certain time period. People who were infected before that time period are not included in the total, even if they are still alive. Unfortunately, directly measuring HIV incidence is a complex and expensive process, so incidence data for many resource-poor areas, and some rich ones, is difficult to find. However, one example is that (according to USAID) in the Masaka region of Uganda, HIV incidence fell from 7.6 per thousand per year in 1990 to 3.2 per thousand per year by 1998.5 National estimates of HIV incidence are usually produced by computer models and are based on estimates of HIV prevalence. Such models apply a set of assumptions such as the survival time of those infected with HIV and the mother-to-child transmission rate. Trends in HIV prevalence among teenagers and young adults can give a rough idea of incidence because infections among this group are likely to have been recently acquired. back to top Estimated AIDS deaths Computer models are also used to produce estimates of the number of people to have died of AIDS, based on HIV prevalence, according to the same set of assumptions. The accuracy of the assumptions is monitored using surveys of the general population, and the estimates may be compared with reports of AIDS diagnoses, census records or death certificate data. Organisations like UNAIDS/WHO constantly review and improve their methods and assumptions, taking into account the latest research findings. back to top Margin of error This is a phrase used to explain the precision of an estimate. Because the groups looked at by surveys can never be entirely representative of the wider population, and because no computer model is perfect, there will always be some degree of uncertainty attached to figures derived from them. For this reason, an estimate is often accompanied by a range or 'plausibility bound', and the width of the range is an indication of the uncertainty of the estimate. The wider the range, the greater the uncertainty. The size of a plausibility bound is affected by the quality of the data and the number of steps and assumptions used to arrive at the estimate. Also, ranges tend to be larger when the numbers being estimated are smaller, because it is then likely that fewer people are included in surveys. Another property of HIV-related plausibility bounds is that they tend to be wider in countries with low-level or concentrated epidemics. This is because, in low-level or concentrated epidemics, one needs to estimate both the numbers of people in the groups at higher risk of HIV infection and HIV prevalence rates in those groups. Arguably the most important estimates in the world are the national ones produced by UNAIDS/WHO. These organisations say of their own estimates that they "are confident that the actual numbers of people living with HIV, people who have been newly infected or who have died of AIDS lie within the reported ranges". back to top Understanding HIV prevalence and incidence trends Changes in HIV incidence statistics can give an idea of whether prevention strategies are being successful in reducing the number of new infections. A society that shows regularly declining incidence figures is one that is experiencing fewer and fewer new infections, which is certainly desirable. Trends in HIV prevalence are less easy to interpret. In the early years of a typical HIV epidemic, prevalence increases rapidly because more and more people are becoming infected and few are dying. But prevalence cannot increase forever - eventually the death rate (number of deaths per year) rises to equal the incidence rate (number of new infections per year), and so prevalence reaches a peak. In some African countries, HIV prevalence appears to have stabilized at a very high level. This means that two things are happening at the same time: many new infections are occurring and many people are dying. And if a country's total population continues to grow then the number of people living with HIV increases even while the prevalence rate remains stable. A rise in HIV prevalence is not necessarily a sign of failing prevention campaigns. Besides a rise in incidence, it could result from any of the following: The death rate has fallen because of improvements in treatment and care (this has happened in high-income countries). The death rate has fallen because fewer infected people are dying as a result of war, famine or other causes that had disproportionately affected people living with HIV. The death rate has fallen as a result of an earlier drop in incidence (on average, people survive for a number of years after becoming infected, so incidence trends have a delayed effect on death trends). More people living with HIV are immigrating than are emigrating (this affects a number of high-income countries). The survey bias has changed. Equally, a fall in HIV prevalence is not necessarily a sign of effective prevention campaigns, as it could result from an increase in the number of deaths. It is even possible for HIV prevalence to increase at a time when HIV incidence is decreasing - for example, in a society that is rapidly scaling-up antiretroviral treatment provision while also making improvements to prevention activities. The drop in the number of new infections might then be outweighed by the effect of people living longer. back to top Glossary HIV and AIDS epidemic statistics use particular terms in particular ways, and sometimes with special meanings. Here, you can find explanations of the terms used in our pages. Adults Adults are defined by UNAIDS/WHO as men and women aged 15 years and older. Until 2006, adults were defined as men and women aged 15-49 but this was changed to reflect the the substantial (and in some countries increasing) numbers of older people living with HIV. However, to continue to ensure comparability across different countries and populations the 15-49 age bracket is still sometimes used in reports to report country specific HIV prevalence. When this definition of adults is used it is made clear that adults are defined as people aged 15-49. Children Most reports define children as males and females aged between 0 and 14 years. Cumulative figures A 'cumulative' figure gives a total number, from the time that recording of data first began, until a specified date. Exposure category This term is used when talking about the ways in which people were infected with HIV. It is often very difficult to say for certain how someone became infected with HIV - for example, an injecting drug user might be infected sexually, or a man who has sex with other men might become infected by a woman. The term 'exposure category' refers to what is assumed to be the most probable means of HIV transmission. Orphans In UNAIDS/WHO reports an 'orphan' is defined as being someone aged 0 to 17 years, who has lost one or both parents to AIDS. Most other studies also use this definition. People living with AIDS Statistics giving numbers of people living with AIDS can sometimes make confusing reading because different countries and agencies have different definitions of what AIDS actually is. For example, in Europe an AIDS diagnosis must be based on the diagnosis of an AIDS-related illness, but in the USA it may also be based on a low CD4 cell count. When testing is unavailable, the presence of AIDS, as opposed to HIV, is determined on the basis of a number of clinical symptoms or signs associated with immune deficiency. The World Health Organization has developed a clinical staging of HIV disease for adults and adolescents. Estimates of the number of people living with AIDS are usually based on the estimated number of people living with HIV and estimated survival times, but minimum estimates may be derived from case reports. People living with HIV Many reports and tables give figures for the 'number of people living with HIV'. This number represents all people living with HIV infection, whether or not they have developed symptoms of AIDS, who are alive at the given time. Estimates of the number of people living with HIV are usually based on the estimated HIV prevalence and total population size, but minimum estimates may be derived from case reports. Reporting delays A problem with reported data is that it is sometimes hard to detect trends over time, especially when looking at recent years. Reports of HIV or AIDS diagnoses can sometimes take months, or a few years, to reach a central agency that compiles the total figure. Statistics experts know from experience roughly what proportion of reports will arrive late. They are therefore able to produce estimates in which the most recent figures have been adjusted to cancel out the effect of reporting delays. The table below illustrates the way in which reported and estimated data can differ, especially in recent years. Year Reported cases of HIV Estimated cases of HIV 2000 154 155 2001 171 173 2002 250 260 2003 259 302 2004 169 333 You can see from the table that the apparent drop in 2004 is probably due to reporting delays, and that the true number of new diagnoses probably continued to rise. email print tweet more Where Next? AVERT.org has more about: HIV and AIDS statistics AIDS statistics for USA major cities Worldwide HIV and AIDS statistics Coming out Back to top Sign up to our Newsletter Donate Sources back to top UNAIDS, Understanding the latest estimates of the 2007 AIDS Epidemic Update Sexually Transmitted Infections, Volume 80, Supplement 1: Methods and Tools for HIV/AIDS Estimates and Projections, BMJ Journals, 2004 - 2004 UNAIDS/WHO, 2004 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic Sexually Transmitted Infections, Volume 84, Supplement 1: Improved data, methods and tools for the 2007 HIV and AIDS estimates and projections UNAIDS/WHO, Questions and Answers, 2004 - 2004 References back to top WHO, Second Generation Surveillance for HIV/AIDS HPA (2009) 'HIV in the United Kingdom: 2009 report' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009) 'HIV Testing' WHO, Report on Global Surveillance of Epidemic-prone Infectious Diseases - Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS), 2000 USAID (2002, September) 'What Happened in Uganda? : Declining HIV Prevalence, Behavior Change, and the National Response' english español back to content home pageHIV & AIDS Topics StatisticsEpidemicGlobal EpidemicAIDS & HIV Around the WorldAIDS : What is AIDS? What causes AIDS?HIV & AIDS NewsHIV : The virus that causes AIDSReflections on the Epidemic World AIDS DayMoney for HIV/AIDSFunding for HIV and AIDS Money for HIV/AIDSPEPFARThe Global Fund How different people are affected by HIV and AIDS Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM)Children orphaned by HIV and AIDSChildren, HIV and AIDSHIV/AIDS and Vulnerable Groups Prisons, Prisoners and HIV/AIDSTransgender People and HIV/AIDSWomen and HIV/AIDSIssuesHIV & Injecting Drug Users HIV & AIDS Stigma and DiscriminationHIV and AIDS IssuesHIV and Sex WorkHistoryHIV and AIDS HistoryAIDS TimelineHistory of AIDS Up to 1986History of AIDS: 1987-1992History of AIDS: 1993-1997History of AIDS: 1998-2002History of AIDS: 2003-2006History of AIDS: 2007 OnwardsAVERT History History of the HIV and AIDS Charity AVERT AVERT: Early 1990s to the start of the InternetAVERT: Overseas projects & developing AVERT.orgAVERT: Southern African projects and AVERT.orgAVERT: The First Five YearsLiving with HIVLiving with HIV and AIDSAm I going to die?Emotional Needs and SupportHIV and PregnancyLearning You Are HIV PositiveLiving with HIV StoriesWhat is living with HIV?PreventionOverview of HIV preventionHIV Prevention Around the WorldIntroduction to HIV PreventionPrevention of HIV transmission from mother to childHIV Transmission from Mother-to-childPreventing Mother-to-child Transmission (PMTCT) in PracticePreventing Mother-to-child Transmission of HIV WHO Guidelines for PMTCT & BreastfeedingPrevention of HIV transmission through bloodBlood Safety and HIVNeedle Exchange and Harm ReductionPrevention of HIV Transmission through BloodAIDS and sex educationAbstinence and Sex EducationHIV Prevention through Sex EducationHIV/AIDS Education and Young PeopleIntroduction to HIV and AIDS EducationLessons and Activity PlansSex Education That WorksPrevention of sexual transmission of HIVCircumcision & HIVCondoms: Effectiveness, History and AvailabilityHIV Prevention StrategiesPrevention of Sexual Transmission of HIVSex Workers and HIV PreventionThe Female CondomUsing Condoms, Condom Types and SizesHIV treatment as preventionHIV Treatment As PreventionHIV Treatment for PreventionPost-exposure Prophylaxis Pre-exposure ProphylaxisScienceHIV scienceA Cure for AIDSA World Free from HIVHIV and AIDS VaccineHIV Causes AIDSHIV Drugs, Vaccines and Animal TestingHIV Structure and Life CycleHIV Types, Subtypes Groups and StrainsMicrobicidesThe Origin of HIV and AIDS StatisticsWorldwide HIV & AIDS StatisticsUnderstanding HIV and AIDS StatisticsWorldwide HIV & AIDS StatisticsWorldwide HIV & AIDS Statistics CommentaryAmerican HIV & AIDS StatisticsUnited States of America HIV & AIDS Statistics Canadian HIV & AIDS StatisticsCanada AIDS Statistics by Year and AgeCanada HIV Statistics SummaryLatin American & Caribbean HIV & AIDS StatisticsCaribbean HIV & AIDS StatisticsLatin America HIV & AIDS StatisticsAfrican HIV & AIDS StatisticsSouth Africa HIV & AIDS StatisticsSub-Saharan Africa HIV & AIDS StatisticsAsian HIV & AIDS StatisticsIndia HIV & AIDS StatisticsSouth East Asia HIV & AIDS StatisticsAustralian HIV & AIDS StatisticsAustralia HIV & AIDS StatisticsEuropean HIV & AIDS StatisticsEuropean HIV and AIDS StatisticsUK HIV and AIDS Statistics Transmission & Testing HIV transmissionAIDS: Fear and AnxietyCan You Get HIV From. . . ?Criminal Transmission of HIVHIV & AIDS SymptomsHIV and BreastfeedingHIV Transmission Questions & AnswersHIV testingHIV TestingHIV Testing Frequently Asked QuestionsTreatment & Care HIV and AIDS treatmentHIV and AIDS TreatmentHIV and AIDS Treatment & CareHIV Treatment for ChildrenStarting, monitoring & switching HIV treatmentHIV and AIDS care HIV and AIDS CareHIV and AIDS Home Based CareHIV/AIDS and PainPalliative CareHIV and AIDS drugsAntiretroviral Drug Side EffectsAntiretroviral Drugs TableHIV and AIDS DrugsNew Antiretroviral DrugsTreatment accessAIDS, Drug Prices and Generic DrugsTreatment AccessUniversal Access to HIV/AIDS TreatmentAIDS-related infectionsHIV Opportunistic Infections: Prevention and TreatmentHIV/AIDS & related InfectionsStages of HIV InfectionTuberculosisOther treatment and careAlternative and Traditional Medicine for HIVHIV and NutritionHIV & AIDS Around The World AfricaThe HIV & AIDS epidemic in AfricaGay Men in Africa and HIV/AIDSHIV and AIDS in AfricaHIV and AIDS in Africa QuestionsThe Impact of HIV & AIDS in AfricaAfrican countriesHIV & AIDS in BotswanaHIV & AIDS in MalawiHIV and AIDS in KenyaHIV and AIDS in NigeriaHIV and AIDS in South AfricaHIV and AIDS in SwazilandHIV and AIDS in TanzaniaHIV and AIDS in UgandaHIV and AIDS in ZambiaHIV and AIDS in ZimbabweHIV and AIDS in LesothoHistory of HIV & AIDS in AfricaHistory of HIV & AIDS in AfricaHistory of HIV & AIDS in South AfricaTimeline of AIDS in AfricaAmericasHIV & AIDS in the United StatesHistory of HIV & AIDS in the United States of AmericaHIV & AIDS in the United States of AmericaHIV & AIDS Treatment in the United States of AmericaHIV and AIDS Among African AmericansHelp and advice for HIV and AIDS in AmericaUSA HIV & AIDS Help and AdviceHIV & AIDS in Latin America and the CaribbeanHIV & AIDS in BrazilHIV and AIDS in Latin AmericaHIV and AIDS in the CaribbeanAsia & EuropeHIV & AIDS in AsiaHIV & AIDS in ChinaHIV & AIDS in ThailandHIV and AIDS in AsiaOverview of HIV and AIDS in IndiaTimeline of AIDS in AsiaWho is Affected by HIV and AIDS in India?HIV & AIDS in EuropeHistory of HIV & AIDS in the UK 1981-1995History of HIV & AIDS in the UK 1996 OnwardsHIV and AIDS in Russia, Eastern Europe & Central AsiaHIV and AIDS in the UKHIV and AIDS in Western and Central EuropeHIV and AIDS Treatment in the UKHelp and advice in the UKHelp and Advice for HIV/AIDS in the UKWho Has to Pay for NHS Treatment in the UK?Sex, Sexuality & Relationships Gay & LesbianGay & LesbianAm I Gay? Are You Born Gay? Can You Stop Being Gay?Coming outGay and LesbianGay SexHomophobia, Prejudice & Attitudes to Gay Men & LesbiansHomosexual or Gay?How Many Gay People Are There?Lesbians, Bisexual Women and Safe SexYoung & GayBeing Gay at SchoolHIV, AIDS and Young Gay MenGay & LesbianAm I a Lesbian?Am I Gay?Young Gay Men & LesbiansResources & helpResources for people who are gay, lesbian or unsure'Young Gay Men Talking' booklet [PDF]STDsCommon STDsChlamydia Genital Warts HPVGonorrhea Hepatitis A, B & CHerpes STD PicturesSTIs or STDsSyphilisSTD StatisticsSTD Statistics WorldwideSTDs in AmericaSTDs in the UKSexInformation about sex Condoms & Spermicides questionsContraception questionsHow to Have SexOral SexPregnancy QuestionsSex QuestionsWorldwide Ages of ConsentYoung PeopleRelationships & SexAm I Ready for Sex?Being Gay, Sexuality and Attraction Having SexHaving Sex for the First TimeRelationships and FeelingsRelationships and Sex Your Body and PubertyPuberty and Boys' BodiesPuberty, Periods and Girls' BodiesYour Body, Puberty and Sexual Organs Having Safer SexAbout HIV/AIDS for Young PeopleAbout STIs & STDs for Young PeopleBirth Control and Contraception for Young PeopleCondom Tips for Young PeopleDrink, Drugs & SexHaving Safer SexSex, the Internet and TechnologySex, the Law and Young PeopleHIV-positive LifeBeing HIV-positive and HealthyFinding Out That You're HIV-positiveFriends, Attitudes and HIVSex and Relationships for HIV-positive Young PeopleFAQ about sexQuestions About Sex for Young PeopleOther WebsitesGo Ask Alice!Sex, Etc.BBC - The SurgeryPhotos, Videos, Games & Stories Games Play our games to test your knowledge and skills, while learning new facts. See how much you know about HIV/AIDS and sexual health, with our AIDS Game, Sex Education Game, Pregnancy Game and Condom Game. Use your mouse to collect the right letters while avoiding the baddies for a chance to appear on our HI-scores table. Give our games a try now, and see how well you can do! AIDS Game Pregnancy Game Sex Education Game Condom Game Photos & Videos Our media gallery contains hundreds of HIV and AIDS related photos, videos and graphics. You can have a look around, use the search feature, or take a look at some photo selections. Photo Selections Photos & Videos Gallery Media Types Photos Graphics Videos Search the Media Gallery Latest media: Quizzes Try our quizzes to test your knowledge on all aspects of sexual health and HIV and AIDS. We have a Sex Quiz, Pregnancy Quiz, Condom Quiz and an HIV and AIDS Quiz. Just a beginner? Then try the quizzes' easy levels. Think you're an expert? Well try the hard quizzes. AIDS Challenge HIV and AIDS Quiz Pregnancy Quiz Sex Education Quiz Condom Quiz StoriesLesbian and gay storiesComing out StoriesYoung Bisexual and Gay Men: Personal StoriesYoung Lesbian and Bisexual: Personal StoriesHIV and AIDSHIV and AIDS in the FamilyPersonal Stories of Men Living with HIVPersonal Stories of Women Living with HIVPersonal Stories of Young People Living with HIVStories From Around the WorldTalking about sex First Time Sex StoriesStories of Sex EducationSubmit a storyFeatured Story I went through kind of a phase shift from just getting feelings towards this one guy, to be being confused and feeling kind of bi... - Submitted by Wesley Read more >> InternationalYouth Day 2013 Involving youth in the HIV response Giving young people a platform to share their thoughts and experiences raises awareness among their peers and gives an invaluable insight into the needs of this high-risk group. More than 2,400 young people are newly infected with HIV every day, accounting for 40% of new adult infections. Involving youth in the HIV response is key to lowering new HIV infections among the next generation and the role of technology in doing this is now clearer than ever. A sneak preview of results from an AVERT survey, due to be released on International Youth Day 2013 - 12 August, show that most young people prefer to get their sexual health and HIV/AIDS information online or via mobile, as it's quicker, confidential and cheap. But not all youth are the same, we've found regional variations in the type of technology young people prefer - with 67% of respondents from Africa using mobile phones for health information, compared to just 31% in Europe. To commemorate International Youth Day 2013 - 12 August, share your experiences with others by sending AVERT your story. Raise HIV awareness among youth, check out the hints, tips and quizzes below and share them with your friends. Young People Zone Quizzes 'Can't Explain' home pageTemas sobre el VIH y el SIDA ¿Puede Contraer SIDA De. . . ?Síntomas Del VIH Y Del SIDASIDAVIHPruebas De Detección Del VIHVIH, Embarazo, Madres Y BebésVisión General De La Prevención De VIHIntroducción Al Tratamiento De VIH Y SIDALa Evidencia De Que El VIH Causa El SIDALas Estadísticas Del SIDA Y VIH En El MundoSexo, sexualidad y las relaciones ¿Cómo Se Tiene Sexo?Preguntas Generales Sobre SexoUso De Condones, Tipos Y Tamaños De Condones¿Soy Gay? ¿Se Nace Gay? ¿Se Puede Dejar De Ser Gay?Enfermedades De Transmisión Sexual Y Síntomas De ETSMedia, juegos y concursos Fotos y VideosJuegos (en Inglés) Search Avert.org Click to search site search back to content
An HIV/AIDS epidemic is defined by the HIV prevalence in the general population, which is the percentage of the population living with HIV. An epidemic is either generalised (HIV prevalence is 1% or more in the general population), concentrated (HIV prevalence is below 1% in the general population but exceeds 5% in specific at-risk populations like injecting drug users or sex workers) or low level (HIV prevalence is not recorded at a significant level in any group).1 In order to understand the epidemics of HIV that are spreading around the world, and the AIDS epidemics which follow, it is necessary to look at certain figures. The figures we need include the number of people living with HIV (the HIV prevalence), the number of new infections (the HIV incidence), and the number of people who have died of AIDS.
There has been a lot of study into the medical and social aspects of the world's epidemics, which has generated a great deal of data. This information is often presented as long numbers, graphs and tables, and sometimes the terminology used can be quite technical. In order to turn such information into an understanding of the epidemics, we need to know where the data come from and what they really mean.
There are two main types of national HIV and AIDS statistics:
With reported diagnoses, each number indicates an actual positive result for a person's HIV test. This method of looking at an epidemic can give an extremely clear picture in terms of real people who have been affected by the virus, especially when looking at smaller areas. However, it is often not a reliable way of assessing wider trends because many people living with HIV have never taken an HIV test, and not all diagnoses are reported.
In general, national totals of reported HIV diagnoses are only really useful when they come from places with well-developed voluntary testing schemes, such as the USA, Western Europe, Canada or Australia. However, even in these countries, there are significant numbers of people who have never taken a test and remained undiagnosed. For example, in the United Kingdom it is estimated that 1 in 4 people who are living with HIV do not know they are infected as they have not been diagnosed.2 In the United States, 1 in 5 people infected are unaware of their HIV positive status.3 Some states of the USA do not report any HIV statistics through the name-based system used to compile national surveillance reports.
Another point to remember is that looking at the years in which people tested HIV positive does not tell you when they were infected - the test itself may come many years after infection occurred. And when looking at HIV reports, it's important to keep in mind that there might be more than one reason for trends in the data. An increase in diagnoses might not mean that more people are becoming infected with HIV than in previous years - it might mean, instead, that HIV testing has become more easily available than in recent years, or that stigmatisation of people living with HIV has declined, so more people are willing to be tested.
In terms of characteristics (such as age, gender, race, etc), HIV reports are not necessarily entirely representative of all HIV infections because some groups of people may be more likely to be tested than others. It is worth remembering this limitation when interpreting reported statistics by exposure category in particular.
Reports from the most recent years are usually affected by reporting delays (see Glossary, below).
Most countries have a long history of reporting AIDS cases and in many places - including the USA, Canada and much of Africa - reporting of all diagnoses is compulsory.
A problem with AIDS case reporting is that different countries have different definitions of what actually constitutes AIDS. While a definition of AIDS is becoming standardised, there is still the problem that some resource-poor areas lack HIV testing facilities, and therefore have to diagnose AIDS on the basis of symptoms alone. Another problem is that people with AIDS do not commonly have this disease for long - it either kills them or, given access to antiretroviral medication, they frequently cease to have symptoms.
If someone is thought to have died from AIDS then this should be recorded on their death certificate. However, it is acknowledged that such records are less reliable in countries where AIDS is highly stigmatised, because doctors are sometimes inclined to spare shame to a family by mis-recording the cause of an AIDS death.
The World Health Organisation says of AIDS case surveillance that, "While giving a general idea of the increase of AIDS in a population, the figures do not reflect the actual prevalence of AIDS disease so much as the accuracy of detection, diagnosis and reporting of the disease syndrome". The proportion of AIDS cases reported varies from less than 10% in some countries to almost 90% in others.4
'HIV prevalence' is given as a percentage of a population. If a thousand truck drivers, for example, are tested for HIV and 30 of them are found to be positive, then the results of a study might say that HIV prevalence amongst truck drivers is 3%.
For the purpose of producing a national or international HIV prevalence figure, researchers include all people with HIV infection who are alive at a given point in time, whether or not they have progressed to AIDS.
In most cases, HIV prevalence cannot be accurately determined from reported cases because many infections are undiagnosed or unreported. The best estimates are mainly based on the results of surveys of large groups of people.
In a country with a generalised epidemic (a high level of infection in the whole population), the national estimate of HIV prevalence is usually mainly based on surveys of pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. Because antenatal clinics are well-attended in most such countries, these data provide a good basis for comparisons; they are also very reliable indicators of trends in prevalence. Surveys collect blood over a short period from all women attending a clinic for the first time (to avoid duplication). All identifying details are removed from the samples, except age group and location of clinic, before they are screened for HIV to determine prevalence.
Many studies have shown that HIV prevalence among pregnant women attending clinics is generally very similar to prevalence in the adult population as a whole. Often some small adjustments are made - for example to compensate for under-reporting in the most rural areas, or for large differences between male and female rates of infection. Such refinements are made according to the findings of separate surveys of the general population.
Population based surveys are useful because they tell us how prevalence varies according to gender, race or other characteristics, but they are usually not the main source of national prevalence estimates. One reason for this is that population based surveys are much more complicated and expensive than antenatal surveys. Nevertheless, population based surveys are becoming more frequent, and their influence on national HIV prevalence estimates is increasing. Between 2001 and 2007, thirty countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Caribbean conducted national population based surveys. The results of these surveys have led to significant revisions of HIV prevalence estimates for several countries - most notably India in 2007.
In a country with a low-level or concentrated epidemic (where high levels of infection are found only in specific groups), the national estimate of HIV prevalence is mainly based on data collected from populations most at risk - usually sex workers, injecting drug users or men who have sex with men - and on estimates of the sizes of the populations at high risk and at low risk. Reports of HIV diagnoses and AIDS deaths may also be taken into account.
Better understanding of the nature of an HIV epidemic allows better prevalence estimates to be produced. This is why, each year when a new set of estimates is brought out, the figures for previous years may change.
'HIV incidence' is the number of new HIV infections in the population during a certain time period. People who were infected before that time period are not included in the total, even if they are still alive.
Unfortunately, directly measuring HIV incidence is a complex and expensive process, so incidence data for many resource-poor areas, and some rich ones, is difficult to find. However, one example is that (according to USAID) in the Masaka region of Uganda, HIV incidence fell from 7.6 per thousand per year in 1990 to 3.2 per thousand per year by 1998.5
National estimates of HIV incidence are usually produced by computer models and are based on estimates of HIV prevalence. Such models apply a set of assumptions such as the survival time of those infected with HIV and the mother-to-child transmission rate. Trends in HIV prevalence among teenagers and young adults can give a rough idea of incidence because infections among this group are likely to have been recently acquired.
Computer models are also used to produce estimates of the number of people to have died of AIDS, based on HIV prevalence, according to the same set of assumptions.
The accuracy of the assumptions is monitored using surveys of the general population, and the estimates may be compared with reports of AIDS diagnoses, census records or death certificate data. Organisations like UNAIDS/WHO constantly review and improve their methods and assumptions, taking into account the latest research findings.
This is a phrase used to explain the precision of an estimate. Because the groups looked at by surveys can never be entirely representative of the wider population, and because no computer model is perfect, there will always be some degree of uncertainty attached to figures derived from them. For this reason, an estimate is often accompanied by a range or 'plausibility bound', and the width of the range is an indication of the uncertainty of the estimate. The wider the range, the greater the uncertainty.
The size of a plausibility bound is affected by the quality of the data and the number of steps and assumptions used to arrive at the estimate. Also, ranges tend to be larger when the numbers being estimated are smaller, because it is then likely that fewer people are included in surveys.
Another property of HIV-related plausibility bounds is that they tend to be wider in countries with low-level or concentrated epidemics. This is because, in low-level or concentrated epidemics, one needs to estimate both the numbers of people in the groups at higher risk of HIV infection and HIV prevalence rates in those groups.
Arguably the most important estimates in the world are the national ones produced by UNAIDS/WHO. These organisations say of their own estimates that they "are confident that the actual numbers of people living with HIV, people who have been newly infected or who have died of AIDS lie within the reported ranges".
Changes in HIV incidence statistics can give an idea of whether prevention strategies are being successful in reducing the number of new infections. A society that shows regularly declining incidence figures is one that is experiencing fewer and fewer new infections, which is certainly desirable.
Trends in HIV prevalence are less easy to interpret.
In the early years of a typical HIV epidemic, prevalence increases rapidly because more and more people are becoming infected and few are dying. But prevalence cannot increase forever - eventually the death rate (number of deaths per year) rises to equal the incidence rate (number of new infections per year), and so prevalence reaches a peak.
In some African countries, HIV prevalence appears to have stabilized at a very high level. This means that two things are happening at the same time: many new infections are occurring and many people are dying. And if a country's total population continues to grow then the number of people living with HIV increases even while the prevalence rate remains stable.
A rise in HIV prevalence is not necessarily a sign of failing prevention campaigns. Besides a rise in incidence, it could result from any of the following:
Equally, a fall in HIV prevalence is not necessarily a sign of effective prevention campaigns, as it could result from an increase in the number of deaths.
It is even possible for HIV prevalence to increase at a time when HIV incidence is decreasing - for example, in a society that is rapidly scaling-up antiretroviral treatment provision while also making improvements to prevention activities. The drop in the number of new infections might then be outweighed by the effect of people living longer.
HIV and AIDS epidemic statistics use particular terms in particular ways, and sometimes with special meanings. Here, you can find explanations of the terms used in our pages.
Adults are defined by UNAIDS/WHO as men and women aged 15 years and older. Until 2006, adults were defined as men and women aged 15-49 but this was changed to reflect the the substantial (and in some countries increasing) numbers of older people living with HIV. However, to continue to ensure comparability across different countries and populations the 15-49 age bracket is still sometimes used in reports to report country specific HIV prevalence. When this definition of adults is used it is made clear that adults are defined as people aged 15-49.
Most reports define children as males and females aged between 0 and 14 years.
A 'cumulative' figure gives a total number, from the time that recording of data first began, until a specified date.
This term is used when talking about the ways in which people were infected with HIV. It is often very difficult to say for certain how someone became infected with HIV - for example, an injecting drug user might be infected sexually, or a man who has sex with other men might become infected by a woman. The term 'exposure category' refers to what is assumed to be the most probable means of HIV transmission.
In UNAIDS/WHO reports an 'orphan' is defined as being someone aged 0 to 17 years, who has lost one or both parents to AIDS. Most other studies also use this definition.
Statistics giving numbers of people living with AIDS can sometimes make confusing reading because different countries and agencies have different definitions of what AIDS actually is. For example, in Europe an AIDS diagnosis must be based on the diagnosis of an AIDS-related illness, but in the USA it may also be based on a low CD4 cell count.
When testing is unavailable, the presence of AIDS, as opposed to HIV, is determined on the basis of a number of clinical symptoms or signs associated with immune deficiency. The World Health Organization has developed a clinical staging of HIV disease for adults and adolescents.
Estimates of the number of people living with AIDS are usually based on the estimated number of people living with HIV and estimated survival times, but minimum estimates may be derived from case reports.
Many reports and tables give figures for the 'number of people living with HIV'. This number represents all people living with HIV infection, whether or not they have developed symptoms of AIDS, who are alive at the given time.
Estimates of the number of people living with HIV are usually based on the estimated HIV prevalence and total population size, but minimum estimates may be derived from case reports.
A problem with reported data is that it is sometimes hard to detect trends over time, especially when looking at recent years. Reports of HIV or AIDS diagnoses can sometimes take months, or a few years, to reach a central agency that compiles the total figure.
Statistics experts know from experience roughly what proportion of reports will arrive late. They are therefore able to produce estimates in which the most recent figures have been adjusted to cancel out the effect of reporting delays. The table below illustrates the way in which reported and estimated data can differ, especially in recent years.
You can see from the table that the apparent drop in 2004 is probably due to reporting delays, and that the true number of new diagnoses probably continued to rise.
english español
Play our games to test your knowledge and skills, while learning new facts. See how much you know about HIV/AIDS and sexual health, with our AIDS Game, Sex Education Game, Pregnancy Game and Condom Game. Use your mouse to collect the right letters while avoiding the baddies for a chance to appear on our HI-scores table.
Give our games a try now, and see how well you can do!
Our media gallery contains hundreds of HIV and AIDS related photos, videos and graphics. You can have a look around, use the search feature, or take a look at some photo selections.
Try our quizzes to test your knowledge on all aspects of sexual health and HIV and AIDS. We have a Sex Quiz, Pregnancy Quiz, Condom Quiz and an HIV and AIDS Quiz.
Just a beginner? Then try the quizzes' easy levels. Think you're an expert? Well try the hard quizzes.
I went through kind of a phase shift from just getting feelings towards this one guy, to be being confused and feeling kind of bi... - Submitted by Wesley Read more >>
Giving young people a platform to share their thoughts and experiences raises awareness among their peers and gives an invaluable insight into the needs of this high-risk group. More than 2,400 young people are newly infected with HIV every day, accounting for 40% of new adult infections.
Involving youth in the HIV response is key to lowering new HIV infections among the next generation and the role of technology in doing this is now clearer than ever.
A sneak preview of results from an AVERT survey, due to be released on International Youth Day 2013 - 12 August, show that most young people prefer to get their sexual health and HIV/AIDS information online or via mobile, as it's quicker, confidential and cheap. But not all youth are the same, we've found regional variations in the type of technology young people prefer - with 67% of respondents from Africa using mobile phones for health information, compared to just 31% in Europe.
To commemorate International Youth Day 2013 - 12 August, share your experiences with others by sending AVERT your story. Raise HIV awareness among youth, check out the hints, tips and quizzes below and share them with your friends.