www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

How Public Voices Gifts Yale

kimberly-51

Kimberly George

In my own vocational journey, I navigate life as both an aspiring scholar and a budding social entrepreneur. I know too well that academic and entrepreneurial contexts are quite different-— even sometimes at odds with one another in their unspoken norms and strategies. Which is why I have been so thrilled this year, as a postgraduate associate at Yale, to witness the Yale Public Voices Fellowship harness the resources of both entrepreneurial and university contexts to offer something truly game changing to the
wider public.

This past Saturday, I had the privilege of observing our 3rd convening. What follows are my reflections on how the fellowship not only supports our scholars as they offer brilliant intellectual gifts to public thought leadership, but also simultaneously gifts our academic community with strategies so often honed in entrepreneurship.

Public Voices Gifts Collaborations
It is clear from observing these convenings that only part of the goal is helping individual scholars successfully build their public platforms. Even more importantly, the fellowship cultivates networks and communities that carry the currents of synergy needed to accomplish something much larger than any one individual voice.

This approach is not insignificant, for individualism has a strong precedence in the production of traditional scholarship, even as it looks different amidst different disciplinary norms. Yet, the partnership Yale has with The OpEd Project is part of new,
collaborative synergies, which I believe will mark dynamic cultural changes this century between higher education and social entrepreneurship. Public Voices Fellowships provides a microcosm of these innovative strategies—a fertile soil for new ways of being together in the production of knowledge and social change.

Public Voices Gifts Play
We are good at a lot of things at Yale—but I wouldn’t put playfulness at the top of our list. And yet, any creative work, whether one is drafting a scholarly journal, writing a TED Talk, or partnering with on-the-ground activists, needs some spirit of play. Too much
seriousness leads to rigidity, but play opens up un-thought possibilities.

kimberlypost
Public Voices convenings help us experience new approaches to our work. For instance, this Saturday Katie Orenstein set up chairs in two circles (an internal and exterior circle) in the middle of the room. I immediately suspected a game of sorts, and I was relieved to be only an observer— until Katie invited me to join the circle. Oh no, I thought. Katie, a room full of Yale scholars doesn’t really play games very well. Can’t we just sit obediently at our desks taking notes? As feared, Katie’s game involved improvisation and charades, such that I soon find myself, per the rules of the game, sparring in a ridiculous fashion with the Dean of Yale College, Mary Miller.

As I participated, I noticed there was a significant shift into something less self-conscious—something more present, playful, and improvisational, ways of being which are actually useful for the writing process. I realized Katie knew what she was doing with us, as she invited us into the risk-taking needing for this work.

Public Voices Gifts Self-Reflection
Finally, self-reflection and assessment is often critical in entrepreneurial endeavors.  While such thinking also happens in the academy, it is also true that we don’t reserve as much time for discussing the experiential components of our work. After all, scholarship—at least in principle— is about a trained “objective” distance. The subjective “I” often takes a backseat.

But, Courtney and Zeba strategically guide the fellows in certain kinds of self-reflection.  For instance, they have invited them to analyze the particular risks of their positionality as writers. “Consider your buckets” as Courtney would say—which means we need to name our location and what is at stake. It’s particularly important to get precise about our fears, not just let them linger vaguely, for once we name the risks, we can make more strategic decisions. Such assessment of risk can unblock hesitations and unleash powerful results—a needed approach as academics venture outside of traditional academic space into new partnerships and spheres of influence.

Kimberly B. George is a creative and academic writer, a writing coach, and an innovator of online feminist theory classes. She’s also a Postgraduate Associate in Gender Equity and Policy for the Women Faculty Forum at Yale University. You can read more about her work at kimberlybgeorge.com.

Fordham PVF Reflections

Hello all,

As the Public Voices intern, I have been transcribing interviews featuring our wonderful PVF fellows over at Fordham, conducted during our third Public Voices convening back in May. In these interviews, the scholars reflect on the impact the Public Voices seminars have had on re-framing their academic work to be more accessible and relevant to the public, as well as on opening the door to having a passionate, compelling, and opinionated public voice. These interviews are some truly insightful and heartening feedback on our year of hard work, and shed a great deal of light on the concrete and substantive result our Public Voices Fellowship program yields, not only in improving the quality and diversity of public thought leadership, but also in generating interest and enthusiasm in using academic scholarship to provide solutions to real life problems.

Here are some excerpts from a few of them. Take a look:

Christinana Peppard (Assistant Professor in Systematic Theology):

Image“The Public Voices Fellowship was an explicit invitation to live into the self whom I had always imagined and understood myself to be, and it really has set the tone for considering my work, the context in which I do it, and thinking about who and how I want to become in this profession and for whose benefit. I think that this project has been an amazing invitation to cultivate my voice for the public good. It’s been extraordinary.”

Christina Greer (Assistant Professor in Political Science):

Image“The value of the program has been enormous in the sense that before I joined, I would give a few interviews here and there for some news outlets, and I never thought of my quote that appeared in the NY Times, the AM NY or the Metro, which is the local newspaper that people read on the subway, as anything of importance or significance—it’s just a quote that I gave about a local election, or a controller or a city council member. And now, as a member of the OpEd project, to really realize that it’s not just about writing longer pieces, which is definitely a goal and a very important aspect of the program, but to really think of myself as a thought leader. So when my students or miscellaneous people say ‘I saw your name in the Metro on my way to work, I really liked your quote,’ I realize now that my little words here or my five minutes on a news program really does contribute to helping someone understand the American political process, and that’s why I got my PhD in the first place.”

Dawn Lerman (Area Chair and Associate Professor of Marketing):

Image“The value has been absolutely enormous. One of the things it’s done for me is help me to translate what I do in an academic sense and make it real and useful to a nonacademic audience, and it’s inspired me to actually use my research, my interest, my expertise in the exact what that I just described, which is: for public good.”

Gregory Acevedo (Associate Professor in Graduate School of Social Service):

Image“[My last op-ed] was a piece that I had been dying to write for the longest time…But scholarly writing gets so bogged down in the evidence, the facts, telling the longer story. Working with Abby was amazing: trying to get all of this complexity and nuance into two pages, the number of rewrites. I found a whole completely different voice, one that was very distinct from the scholarly voice I had, and it was actually a voice that I felt I was more empowered in, in some ways, compared to my scholarly voice: to not have to extinguish or dampen down the passion, or what my opinion or position was, to just do that openly, with the evidence—a healthy respect for evidence—but not to have to play this game of ‘I’m neutral,’ ‘I’m objective,’ no, I’ll tell you what I think. I think that was liberating to me.”

Hope your souls have been invigorated by these genuine responses.

Signing off for the day,

Xueli

PVF Intern

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 278 other followers