Wikipedia:Today's article for improvement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:TAFI)
Jump to: navigation, search
People icon.svg This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians.
Today's article for improvement:
History of pizza

This article entails the history of pizza. Although the word "pizza" was documented the first time in 977 in Gaeta and successively in different parts of Central and South Italy, the history of the dish itself are not very clear or well documented.

The precursor of pizza was probably the focaccia, a flat bread known to the Romans as "panis focacius", to which were than added some toppings.

Past Nominations
Archive Index and Search
Successful Nominations
Unsuccessful Nominations
Shortcut:

Collaborations
Today
Today's article for improvement
Arts & entertainment
Politics
Science & technology
Miscellaneous

Welcome to Today's article for improvement (TAFI). Each day (or other time period, to be selected) we identify an undeveloped or underdeveloped article that requires improvement, to be linked to the Community Portal for collaborative editing, ideally to improve it to good article or even featured article quality over a short time frame, through widespread collaborative editing. This page serves as the coordination point for the project. Here we:

  1. Identify candidate articles;
  2. Select the order they appear on the community portal in the Today's article for improvement section;

Once an article is selected to be a TAFI, which we attempt to have take place at least one week in advance of its term as a TAFI, please add at the top of the article the template {{TAFI}}. Once the article is no longer the current TAFI, please add this template to its talk page: {{Former TAFI}}.

You can invite an editor to join this project using the invitation found here.

[edit] Schedule

This is the schedule for Today's Article for Improvement. Here, you can find the articles that have been chosen to be a TAFI, as well as those that are scheduled to be one in the future.

November 2012
October 2012
September 2012


Contents

[edit] Nominations

[edit] Biscotti

Biscotti di Prato. Twice-baked biscuits originating in the Italian city of Prato. A food that's available on many continents in the world; the Wikipedia article about it could easily be improved upon. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Pizza in the United States

An alternate to the History of pizza article listed below. Easily expandable, and needs more sources to verify information in the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:08, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:08, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

--Coin945 (talk) 13:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Medical certificate

One line stub on a relatively important topic. Coin945 (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Baking

A topic about a worldwide practice in food preparation; its Wikipedia article has only one reference. Sure would be easy to expand. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. Coin945 (talk) 10:52, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Minecart

A stub article that has only 1 reference! This might be a possibly for a future TAFI. Horai 551 (talk) 07:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Horai 551 (talk) 07:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. --Coin945 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
  3. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:56, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Listeria ivanovii

Currently one line stub without references. However, a quick search turned up some very good sources which might be usable to expand the article:

-- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 20:37, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] List of furniture types

Important article talking about all kinds of furniture. However, this can be improved a lot. Horai 551 (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Horai 551 (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. --Coin945 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


Oppose

Comments

[edit] Energy crop

An underdeveloped article that covers several types of energy and renewable energy generated from crops. As of this post, the article has only three citations, and the article is easily expandable due to significant coverage that has occurred and continues to occur about this topic.

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. --Coin945 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


Oppose

Comments

[edit] Agribusiness

Another agriculture-related article that would benefit from more sourcing and expansion. As of this post, the entry has only two citations. The topic has received a great deal of coverage, making the article easily-improvable. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. --Coin945 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Farmer

An underdeveloped article with only three sources (as of this post) about that would benefit from collaboration to improve it. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. --Coin945 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] What Is it Like to Be a Bat?

Although this is about a 1974 paper, it remains an important article in philosophy, about a fascinating subject -- consciousness, what it is, and whether we can ever understand it. Yet it is just a stub. Featuring it might attract some subject-matter specialists. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. --Coin945 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Statue

A start class article with almost all pictures! Needs big help. Horai 551 (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Horai 551 (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. --Coin945 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Romantic music

A vital period of classical music history... and it's a start-class.... Compare with the article baroque music. We have much to add. Coin945 (talk) 18:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 18:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
  2. Horai 551 (talk) 02:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Wall

A common feature of buildings everywhere on the planet; the article (as of this post) has zero sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Box

Easily expandable. Currently (as of this post) has one inline citation and three sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Strip mall

An easily expandable article that currently (as of this post) has exactly one source/inline citation. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:57, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:57, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Employment

Overall, more of a developed article, but it needs some work, and has the potential to be improved through collaboration to reach Good article designation in a timely manner due to its relatively developed state. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Fun

Important subject that we all enjoy. How can this be a Stub?. Horai 551 (talk) 10:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Horai 551 (talk) 10:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

[edit] Bureaucracy

Start-class article of a very important topic. Coin945 (talk) 10:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 10:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Home

As opposed to house. This is a universal concept that is very poorly covered - currently listed as Stub class. Because this is "soft" concept it is difficult to convey the meaning of the word. The article currently gets lost a bit while trying to cover the psychological effects of having/not having a home, as well as trying to define it for animals. Wittylama 06:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Wittylama 06:14, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:34, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
  3. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Blood

Very listy. Hasn't been changed in years. Sooo much that needs to be covered. Pretty much all its edit history for the past 3 or so years (probably more) is all reverting vandalism. Shame, because its a very important topic too.... :'( Coin945 (talk) 15:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 15:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I agree that much could be done, but by TAFI standards it's a reasonably well developed article. —WFC— FL wishlist 05:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Cerium/Holmium/Praseodymium/Erbium (take your pick)

These four are (I'm pretty sure) the only start-class element articles that are fairly low on the Periodic Table (as in naturally occurring and discovered a while ago). They're all core article. Lots of coverage holes. Any one of them would be a good choice IMO. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Salt (chemistry)

Start-class core article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. Just about undeveloped enough for TAFI to be beneficial. —WFC— FL wishlist 05:46, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Dysentery

C-class core article (althoguh looks a lot more start-like). Lots of coverage holes. Yucky subject, but who knows - might be one to pull in the nostalgics. Oregon Trail, anyone? :) Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments


[edit] Melody

Start-class core article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments


[edit] Nail (fastener) - as in the one you hit into a wall

Start-class core article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments


[edit] Church (building)

Start-class core article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Lake Titicaca

Start-class core article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • By TAFI standards this is at a relatively advanced stage of development. —WFC— FL wishlist 05:48, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Male and/or Female

(Kaldari makes an excellent point :D)

Start-class vital articles. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Journalism

Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  3. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Cereal

Cereal is a start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes.Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Board game

Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Recreation

Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. (possibly a bit too close to my "entertainment" suggestion)Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Word

Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Adult and/or Child

Start-class vital articles. Lots of coverage holes. (child could be merge with childhood and preadolescence) Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Furniture

Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Fiction

Start-class vital article. Lots of coverage holes Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Comedy

C class fundamental human concept. Pretty much only history is covered. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 07:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Racism

It has some copyright violation issues and could easily be improved upon. Go Phightins! 20:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Go Phightins! 20:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Dated nominations

[edit] Bedrock

This is a major subject in Earth Science. However, This article has only about 130 words, and two references! --Horai 551 (talk) 11:05, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. --Horai 551 (talk) 11:05, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. Given how short the article is. —WFC— FL wishlist 05:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] List of alcoholic beverages

Following on from the relative success of List of food preparation utensils, I think this is another viable candidate for improvement. A format similar to List of culinary nuts would seem the best way forward, given that most alcoholic beverages fall under sub-categories (such as wines, beers and spirits). —WFC— FL wishlist 08:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nom. —WFC— FL wishlist 08:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Tokyo Disneyland

Tokyo Disneyland is the biggest tourist attraction of Japan. However, this article is fairly small. There is information about the themed areas, but not much else. Horai 551 (talk) 07:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Horai 551 (talk) 07:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] George M. Dallas

Dallas was the vice president under James Knox Polk in the mid 1840s. For a vice president of the United States, his article is pretty bad. This is great for collaboration because it's a Start-class BLP (check that, general biography) with more coverage out there (if not on the web in reference books, but the web would be a start). Anyway, I think this would be a great candidate for TAFI. Thanks-- Go Phightins! (talk) 01:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Go Phightins! (talk) 01:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. Although I must note that this is not a BLP. Dallas died in 1864. AutomaticStrikeout 02:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, meant general biography. He'd be pretty old to still be a BLP. Go Phightins! (talk) 02:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Obscure topic, only gets about 100 pageviews per day. Kaldari (talk) 20:21, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Have to disagree that a former U.S. VP and Secy. of State is "obscure". Go Phightins! 20:34, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Tomboy

Currently barely more than a stub. This article would be great for collaboration because it's mostly a blank slate and there are both academic and popular culture angles to write about. The article currently average 1328 page views per day, which is pretty high. Kaldari (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Kaldari (talk) 22:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
  2. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Sexual repression

Freud (the early describer of this phenomena) is everywhere in how we think about society, and sexual repression is a concept utilized by many many different theorists as well as social movements (think hippies, LGBT, etc.). Besides, it's controversial enough that it might bring people with enough motive to improve the article, Sadads (talk) 20:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Sadads (talk) 20:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

'Comments

  1. I fear this may be opposed for the same reasons my suggestion of Human body was... But good luck to you. If it passes, then awesome. It sound like an intriguing topic. :)--Coin945 (talk) 04:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

[edit] For He's a Jolly Good Fellow

Level 3 Vital article. One of the most popular songs of all time. Coin945 (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  1. Yes, very good! This article can be improved by finding references for all the information. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I don't feel there would be enough interest in editing this and feel it would be better left as someone's pet project. Ryan Vesey 17:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. Your probably right. My reasoning for the two song requests was that if this is sort of stuff lots of our newbies like to edit anywsys (the latest top 40 hit/episode of favourite tv show etc., then why not start off with them to make the newbies feel at home.--Coin945 (talk) 18:20, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Shape

Level 3 Vital article. A very major topic that is rather poorly covered. Coin945 (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  2. Again something that SHOULD be GA or FA. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Man, this article is really complicated! GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  2. This topic is way to broad for focused collaboration in my opinion. Honestly, I don't know where one would start on this, I'd prefer a BLP. Go Phightins! (talk) 20:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments

[edit] Oil

Level 3 Vital article. A very major topic that is rather poorly covered Coin945 (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  2. Awkward subject, but should be expanded upon a lot. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  1. My own opinion: Just because something is "common knowledge" does not mean the article can or should be improved, nor, indeed, does it mean that editors will have an interest in improving it or that they will have the ability to do so. Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:12, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Night in paintings (Eastern art)

Needs some more text and references.  RexRowan  Talk  13:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1.  RexRowan  Talk  13:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  2. Yes, a good one! This article is already being worked on and has some good tips on its Talk page. The writing is clear, and one doesn't need to know a lot about the subject in order to help improve it with some commonsense additions or corrections. Thank you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 21:30, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments I think its too obscure for the average wikipedia reader to really get involved. Sorry...--Coin945 (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

No worries, I think we got the right people working on it at the moment, although some expert input would be appreciated if anyone happens to have the knowledge. Thanks ahead!-- RexRowan  Talk  14:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll agree with Coin. In addition, like you said Rex, there are some great improvements being made already and it's a bit of a niche topic that many people can't help on. Ryan Vesey 17:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

One to watch for sure. Since it is already going under major rework, it should not be put up, the only result would be to confuse and usurp the editorial work of the current contributor. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Human body

One of the most basic human concepts. How can this article be so bad? Coin945 (talk) 10:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Might also have to check out Human anatomy, Human biology, Human physical appearance and Human physiology as there's a lot of cross-over, as well as holes in coverage.

Support

  1. Coin945 (talk) 10:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  2. -- RexRowan  Talk  12:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  3. Inexcusable to have this be so basic, even as a jumping off point, its too lacking. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  4. Oh, bugger the nudity. It's an important topic. Although I believe those of us who aren't dogs may have a conflict of interest. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Per the article apparently containing nudity, as mentioned below. I'm not going to check to find out and I'm not going to make any contributions to this article. I know that some might not appreciate me opposing on the grounds I'm using, but guess what, it's my !vote and that's my opinion. AutomaticStrikeout 16:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Well, you could just use the CSS image blocker. That was the whole point of the conversation. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, maybe I could, but I'm not going to because I have a moral objection to contributing to/calling attention to an article with that kind of content. That might not be a popular opinion, but I'm not going to go against my conscience here. AutomaticStrikeout 16:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough. I think that a moral objection is a little ridiculous, but then I think that rain is wet, so who am I to judge? Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Writ, I think you're taking a stance that is a bit too satirical here. It is reasonable for someone to have a moral objection to this. I don't, but my comment below was related to the idea that people can. It's also fine for you to disagree with a moreal objection, but there's no reason to equate moral objections and opinions on blatantly obvious things. Ryan Vesey 19:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
*sigh* I kinda saw that coming. It wasn't intended to be satirical, it's (another) reference to Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, and the solipsist Ruler of the Universe. I mean no offense, and quite apologize for the misunderstanding. Poor joke on my part. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I apologize, I thought you were making light of his views, probably should have wikilinked "I think that rain is wet". Okay, let's just keep on keeping on. Ryan Vesey 19:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • To be honest, I don't like the idea of using this article because it contains nudity. Even though the nudity is scientific, I feel that there will be editors who don't want to take part in this collaboration as a result. The community portal receives ~10,000 hits a day and I feel like some would be contributors would be put off if the.. TAFI link sent them to a page containing nudity. It also creates trouble for anyone editing from work or a public place. Ryan Vesey 04:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • We could hide the image. I remember reading in one of the wikiforums about finding a way to have image automatically popped down - like templates are. That could be an idea, at least during the editing period. Of course the caption will remain so editors know such an image has already been included.--Coin945 (talk) 05:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • We couldn't do that per WP:NOTCENSORED; however, someone intelligent might be able to put together some CSS so that an individual editor could hide only images on that page. That still wouldn't fix the problem for unknowing editors/new editors (Seeing nudity can be very dramatic for someone who isn't aware of our not censored policy), but it would solve the problem for editors who want to improve the article from work or a public place. Ryan Vesey 05:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • The relevant CSS would be body[class~=page-Human_body] .image{display:none;}. How to get people who want this to actually install it is left as an exercise to the reader. ;) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Ive been trying to move the image down to the reproductive system section... But im editing on my phone and its really hard. It seems this article missed out on the discussion that affected articles like Mohammad surrounding taboo images high up in an article. At least if anyone casually clicks on out, they then won't get a nasty surprise.--Coin945 (talk) 05:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't care about the possibility of some users deciding not to participate in one particular week's collaboration due to the subject matter. Nor do I care that there will inevitably be complaints about our choice of article if or when we run this. However, I do care that users who are uncomfortable with nudity, who haven't yet heard of TAFI, might avoid TAFI altogether if the first they hear about us is as a result of choosing this article.

    In summary, this is a good choice of article, but I would prefer that we don't go with it until we are a little bit more established (2–3 months). —WFC— 14:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Comment - Sadly, the moral issue is one that will be front and center. While it contains nudity with purpose, it is still something that could lead to an awkward situation. Let's play it safe, and medical articles are not friendly to most contributors because of the subject matter. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Members

To join, please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of the list. Members are welcome to display this userbox.

  1. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 01:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
  2. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 05:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC) I am no longer interested in any large scale editing tasks.
  3. Maryana (WMF) (talk) 05:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
  4. Amadscientist (talk) 06:10, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  5.  Ryan Vesey 20:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  6. Theopolisme :) 20:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  7. CaroleHenson (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  8. benzband (talk) 21:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  9. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  10. — ΛΧΣ21™ 22:30, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  11. Electric Catfish 01:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  12. EricEnfermero Howdy! 01:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  13. Good concept. Carrite (talk) 02:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  14. Like it. —WFC— 05:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  15. Activism1234 --Activism1234 06:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  16. Rex is here. -- RexRowan  Talk  10:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  17. (tentatively) Am doing alot but intrigued on how this will work, so happy to keep an eye in. Am juggling alot so not sure how active. Anything which promotes collaboration is A Good Thing. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  18. TheGeneralUser (talk) 18:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  19. John Carter (talk) 18:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
  20. Per Cas. We need good coverage of our most important articles. Kurtis (talk) 20:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  21. tylas Yes! WP does need to be friendlier to female users. Tanya ✫ ♥♫ 21:26, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
  22. Delaywaves • talk 03:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
  23. Soulparadox 07:19, 15 September 2012
  24. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
  25. Ruby 2010/2013 19:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
  26. This is a jolly good idea. I was planning something like this a while back, glad to see it now exists. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
  27. This sounds like a terrific idea. Go Phightins! (talk) 01:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
  28. TheSpecialUser TSU
  29. I will try to help out this cool project!--Horai 551 (talk) 04:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
  30. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 01:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Got hooked editing Entertainment
  31. Northamerica1000 (talk) 21:47, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
  32. Unogarcia (talk) 10:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

[edit] See also

Directory Directory of WikiProjects

  

Council WikiProject Council

  

Guide Guide to WikiProjects
Philosophy
Construction
Deletion
About essays
Overview
Project-wide principles
Core content policies
Other content policies
Content guidelines
Behavioural policies
Behavioural guidelines
Editing guidelines
Style conventions
Classification guidelines
Wikimedia Foundation
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_article_for_improvement&oldid=524830736"