www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Sign in to MLive.com

Close

Gov. Rick Snyder signs bills lowering worker benefits, costs

Published: Monday, December 19, 2011, 10:08 PM     Updated: Tuesday, December 20, 2011, 8:53 AM
The Associated Press
rick-snyder.jpgGov. Rick Snyder

Michigan employers are likely to save money on unemployment insurance and worker's compensation under changes signed into law Monday by Gov. Rick Snyder. Critics, though, said the moves could make it more difficult for injured and jobless workers to get the benefits they need.

The measures require some unemployed workers to take new jobs after 10 weeks of benefits even if the available work is outside their previous experience or pays lower wages than they were making before. They also make it harder for someone to collect jobless benefits if they're fired for cause or leave a job voluntarily.

The new requirements come on top of an earlier law that cuts the length of time that jobless workers can get state unemployment benefits from the current 26 weeks to 20 weeks starting with new applicants in January.

Snyder disagreed with critics who say requiring jobless workers to take a job paying 120 percent of their weekly benefit could trap them in a low-wage position by leaving them little time to look for work in their area of expertise.

"It's to encourage people to work. It's not to have them go backward," Snyder said of the legislation. "It's easiest to find a job when you've gotten a job."

The new laws also overhaul the state's worker's compensation law for the first time in more than two decades by requiring recipients to work if they're offered a job within their skill set that they can physically perform. If they don't take the job, they risk losing their benefits.

"We want to see the employees back to work as soon as they're able," said Rep. Brad Jacobsen, an Oxford Republican who ran a small business and said he saw a former employee get worker's comp benefits even after the worker was recovered enough to come back to work. "We hope this will speed things up."

The new law exempts police and fire department employees from many of the new workers' compensation rules. Attempts by Democrats to exempt other types of workers such as corrections officers failed as the bills were going through the Legislature.

Supporters said the changes reflect recent court rulings, which should make definitions clearer and cut down on the number of workers' comp lawsuits.

"The system's goal must be to help injured workers get back on the job as soon as possible while making sure the benefits they deserve during recovery are paid fully and promptly," Snyder said.

The new laws also allow the state to sell bonds through which Michigan employers can repay the $3 billion owed the federal government for loans made to cover unemployment benefits from 2007 until now. The proceeds from the bonds will be used to pay off the debt, eliminating hefty penalties and interest employers now are paying the federal government.

Employers will repay the bonds and the state will get back $38 million borrowed from the general fund to cover the payments.

The Michigan Chamber of Commerce said the bonds will save employers penalties and interest, even though some will see their payments go up to repay their share of the bonds. Wendy Block of the chamber said the overall legislation will reform the insolvent unemployment insurance system to address many of the problems that created the funding crisis.

"Given the size and scope of the UI debt, and the ever-increasing federal penalties that follow, doing nothing was the most expensive option for job providers," she added.

Related topics: Rick Snyder

Sponsored Links




Comments Feed

View: Oldest first | Newest first
  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 Next comments »
oldcoach65 December 20, 2011 at 5:53AM

That's what it took to rid the red coats. Maybe that is what it takes sway the one percent.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
janitor48 December 19, 2011 at 11:17PM

Kick them when their down should be this state's motto-besides learn how to sponge off relatives until you find any job that exists. The haves in this country totally refuse to solve the unemployment problem.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
SageofthePage December 20, 2011 at 9:48AM

janitor:

What can I do for you today?

What food do you need off of my table?

How can I better serve you?

I'm waiting . . .

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
neposdnah December 20, 2011 at 3:10PM

Sage, you just refuse to believe that whats good for your neighbor is good for you, don't ya

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
farnum December 20, 2011 at 10:22PM

As an attorney from a wealthy family you've never felt hunger; only "not as sated as you feel you're entitled to be".

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
whatever December 28, 2011 at 10:01AM

You are either too young or too stupid to realize what Snyder is doing to Michigan. Either way you continue to make a fool of yourself with your opinions.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
NotaDNotanR December 22, 2011 at 1:56PM

No, as they see it, they HAVE solved it - we are well on the way to permanent serfdom, no matter which 'pocket' of the 2 'party' pair of pants is getting the cash currently. Feudalism is restored, 'their problem,' US, 'we the people,' has been 'solved.'

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Who? December 22, 2011 at 3:51PM

This is all part of the skilled employee reduction act.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
CappGuy December 19, 2011 at 11:27PM

requiring recipients to work if they're offered a job within their skill set that they can physically perform. If they don't take the job, they risk losing their benefits.

What system is in place to enforce this? And just give them the 6 months. If they can't find a job by then enforce this.....

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
starzone December 20, 2011 at 2:01AM

My guess in Michigan Works coordinates these efforts. I thankfully still have my job, but I know some family members who have been unemployed for awhile. They have to submit their resume into the system. My guess is they keep tabs and try to coordinate with the companies that check the database of resumes... but of course, that doesn't cover companies that are not finding employees via the database. I could be wrong - anyone else more informed?

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
dalejiw25 December 20, 2011 at 9:36AM

I have been in the construction industry for well over 25 yrs. In this industry there are allot of lay-offs due to the economy as well as the seasons and other reasons. Over these 25 + years of service and drawing UI benefits that I have earned, Not once has an employer ever contacted me through Michigan works or any other branch of UI concerning employment. UI stands for Unemployment Insurance, The employer as well as myself pay the insurance premium so it is there at lay-off time. In other words, If you don't work, You don't collect. Some may say that I made a bad career choice, but face it, Without the construction industry there would be nothing. Someone has to do it. We cannot all work out of a cushy office if no one builds that cushy office. What is being done to the working class that have built this great country is a complete shame. If this so-called "Governor" can overrule the Federally mandated 26 weeks of UI benefits, What's next ?? Complete Dictatorship with no sign of Democracy ??? Or are we already there ?? Cut government spending not tax paying citizens throats !!!!

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
SageofthePage December 20, 2011 at 9:57AM

dalejiw25:

Show me the receipts that you "paid in" for unemployment.

You can't.

I do know, however, Michigan employers now have to come up with $3 BILLION to pay back the federal government.

This means coming up with $100 BILLION in new sales or "productivity" . . . Think it will happen?

Or . . . this means laying off 100,000 workers . . .

Gee . . . socialism is sure hard to do, isn't it?

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
dalejiw25 December 20, 2011 at 10:13AM

Everyone of my paycheck stubs with federal and state deductions withheld is a receipt of payment in full. Now what happened to those funds that were withheld from my check in regards to paying for said insurance is anyone's guess. UI is no different than auto insurance, If you don't pay in you don't collect. So Sageofthepage, look at the whole pie here, not just a slice.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
rodflash December 20, 2011 at 12:19PM

"Everyone of my paycheck stubs with federal and state deductions withheld is a receipt of payment in full."

But those deductions have nothing to do with Unemployment Insurance. Zero. You don't contribute to it one iota.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
rzdfwl December 26, 2011 at 7:08AM

Every employer pays UI on behalf of each of its employees and from an accounting standpoint considers it as part of the total cost per employee. In otherwords - it's written off the books as an employment cost along with wages, SSI, health care, life insurance, pension, 401K and any other benifit/tax that an employer pays for it's employees. Every time you hear about the UAW workers making $75.00/hour it's because all these benifit/tax costs are lumped on their hourly wage and called "total compensation" inlcuding UI. So...Sage, hellsbells, dale, landing and the rest of you - if you don't want me to have the benifit then stop telling me it's part of my compensation. If it's going to be part of my compensation then give it to me when I need it.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 Next comments »



Quantcast