Smaller, less-expensive shows still work in concert industry's summer of 'doom and gloom'
Audience members watch a music performance at Lincoln Hall, a smaller venue that's been successful in its first year open. (Tribune photo by Andrew A. Nelles)
The arena and amphitheater-level concert industry – a cornerstone of rock touring since the ‘60s – is slumping in what is normally its most profitable time of year.
Summer is traditionally when the touring business makes two-thirds of its revenue. But a few weeks ago, executives of Live Nation Entertainment – the country’s largest concert promoter and ticket seller – reported a 12 percent decline in revenue and lashed out at shareholders for abandoning the company as the value of its stock plummeted.Overall, the top 100 tours are down 17 percent in revenue, posting their lowest midyear total since 2005, according to trade publication Pollstar. The average number of tickets per show has dropped to 6,951 from 7,639.
Another large-scale concert event -- Lollapalooza, one of the most commercially successful rock festivals ever staged in Chicago -- rolls into Grant Park Aug. 6-8 under a legal cloud: an antitrust investigation by the Illinois attorney general’s office.
But on a smaller level, things aren’t quite so dire. In Chicago, clubs such as Buddy Guy’s Legends in the South Loop have expanded and attracted more business, and nearly a year after its opening, Lincoln Hall has solidified its status as a top North Side concert venue. The Old Town School of Folk Music recently announced plans to expand, and will be operating three concert venues by late 2011. The Pitchfork Music Festival in Union Park sold out all three days in Union Park in mid-July. Attendance at weekend street festivals continues to be strong. Independent concert promoter Jam Productions reported an increase in ticket sales over last year, bucking the industry trend, according to Pollstar.
Jam ticket revenue is down 8 percent to $29 million, Jam co-owner Jerry Mickelson says. But “we’re doing more shows overall and selling more tickets at lower prices. That’s because there are less arena shows and more theater and club shows.”
In a follow-up email, Mickelson wrote: “I am not saying that you can draw any direct correlation between Jam's results for the first six months of 2010 and Live Nation's since they control the outdoor amphitheater and indoor arena market. But I do see a trend in that there are less performers who can fill an amphitheater or arena and more acts that are performing in theaters and clubs.”
Jordan Kurland, a San Francisco-based artist manager whose acts include Death Cab for Cutie, She & Him and Feist, suggests one reason Chicago is weathering the downturn better than most cities is the level of fan sophistication combined with an active music media.
“Chicago has an educated, diverse audience that goes out to shows,” he says. “The fans are informed and enthusiastic, and that makes it a place that bands like to play.”
Gary Bongiovanni, editor of Pollstar, says the touring story for the summer needs to be read on two levels: “With few exceptions, arena and amphitheater shows are struggling, but the business has held up better at the club level, which is something we’re seeing across the country,” he says. “Tickets are more affordable at the club level, and it helps mitigate the fact that the economy stinks. It’s a lot easier to sell a $15 nightclub ticket verses a $200 Eagles ticket.”
The Eagles were one of several acts that had to cancel tour dates this summer. Live Nation executives Michael Rapino and Irving Azoff blamed the media for “scaring” artists from touring during an investors meeting in July, after Christina Aguilera and Limp Bizkit canceled entire tours and the Eagles, Rihanna, the Jonas Brothers, “American Idol” and Lilith Fair pulled the plug on numerous shows.
But industry observers say high ticket prices rather than news stories are the main culprit for the plunge in business at the arena and amphitheater level. Ticket prices have climbed more than 28 percent since 2005 for the biggest tours, before dropping this year to $60.77 from $64.61.
For smaller-scale bands charging a fraction of that amount, the story is different, says Tom Windish, a Chicago-based booking agent who works primarily with club-level acts such as Caribou, Delorean and Crystal Castles.
“The way people consume music these days on the Internet, it’s completely different than before,” Windish says. “Their (concertgoing) decisions are not based on a few huge artists, but a lot of different, smaller artists. The people seeing doom and gloom this summer are all about huge acts playing to 20,000 people a night for a high ticket price. But that industry is fading. There are a lot of acts out there making a great living playing to 500 or 1,000 people a night, for a price that doesn’t force fans to decide between paying for the ticket or paying their rent.”
Though summer is the most active touring season, it’s a complex landscape for promoters and agents to negotiate. Even in the best of economies, the summer touring glut gives consumers almost too much to choose from. For fans in Chicago, there are a bounty of choices, including street festivals and free shows in Millennium Park with national-level acts that cut into club attendance. Pitchfork, which books 45 acts each summer, and Lollapalooza, which hosts more than 100, also eat up a lot of local concert revenue.
The office of Illinois Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan has reportedly opened an antitrust investigation over Lollapalooza’s exclusivity clauses in artist contracts, restricting when and where festival bands can play competing shows in the Chicago area.
Lollapalooza promoters will not comment on the investigation, nor will Madigan’s office. But the festival has become a centerpiece of Chicago’s summer concert season. It sold out 225,000 tickets each of the last two years, and this year has expanded capacity to allow for as many as 285,000 fans to fill Grant Park.
The festival is seen as a bargain by many fans who attend, an opportunity to see more than 30 bands a day for $90 (or $215 for three days). This year’s acts range from up-and-comers such as Jukebox the Ghost and Nneka to headliners such as Lady Gaga and Green Day.
A few weeks ago, the Pitchfork Music Festival in Union Park sold out for the fifth consecutive year, with more than 50,000 people attending to see 45 bands over three days. Tickets, including single-day passes for $40, sold out weeks in advance.
“The economy is in the tank, people don’t have that much money to spend and concerts are overpriced,” says Pitchfork e-zine publisher Ryan Schreiber. “Each year when we do the (Pitchfork) festival, we ask ourselves, ‘What would I pay to see these bands? What seems reasonable?’ It’s not rocket science. It’s just common sense.”
To boost sales, Live Nation has cut the price of many of its tours, offering discounts and package deals to put more bodies in seats. Because the promoter owns many of the venues it books, Live Nation makes much of its income from ancillary revenue streams – parking, concessions, merchandise – while the artists keep most of the ticket revenue.
“Where they’ve run into trouble is booking too many shows,” Bongiovanni says. “There is only so much discretionary income to go around, and they’ve crowded the calendar with a lot of things that consumers just aren’t willing to pay that much for. The rampant discounting that’s occurring now is a short-term solution, but not in the long term best interests of the business or the artists involved.”
Live Nation executives told investors a few weeks ago they are looking ahead to a rebound in 2011, with acts such as U2, Kenny Chesney, Neil Diamond and Van Halen on the road. Jason Garner, the company’s CEO for global music, acknowledged that ticket prices must come down, though he put the onus on artists to lower their demands. Flexible pricing of tickets will become a bigger part of the company’s operating plan, with prices for seats fluctuating on an open market based on demand.
But will it be enough?
“We all have to revisit it,” artist-manager Kurland says. “We’re in an evolving economy and our relationship with technology is changing almost every month. The record industry has already changed drastically. The concert industry may not have to adopt a completely different model, but it’s clear that what’s happening now isn’t working anymore.”
greg@gregkot.com
"Live Nation executives told investors a few weeks ago they are looking ahead to a rebound in 2011, with acts such as U2, Kenny Chesney, Neil Diamond and Van Halen on the road."
That's all fine and good, but most arena acts are at the very end of their lifespans. In ten to twenty years, it'll all be over.
Posted by: Rob Kozlowski | July 28, 2010 at 02:27 PM
Greg,
I've always looked forward to reading your articles/reviews regarding Chicago's music scene. As a live music-loving Chicagoan, who has recently moved to the 'burbs, I find myself "living vicariously" through your numerous reviews on the great live music and venues we enjoy in the city and surrounding suburbs.
That said, the "investgative journalism" on display in your recent article "Summer Concert's Doom and Gloom." is at the very least, demeaning to the reader and, at worst, a slap in the face to the hard working people of Chicagoland.
During these economic times, to write about the fact that the large arena rock shows are a harder sell than the intimate club venues is a joke. I especially liked the quote from Gary Bongiovanni, "It's a lot easier to sell a $15 nightclub ticket verses a $200 Eagles ticket." Wow, what a revelation!...
I also found it interesting that you felt it necessary to report that LiveNation lost 12% and "lashed out" to it's shareholders for abandoning them. Cry me a river....Let me tell you, wondering how LiveNation will keep the lights on really keeps me up at night....
Posted by: Jeff | July 28, 2010 at 05:22 PM
@RoBkoZ: Perhaps, but in ten to twenty years they might have the Coldplay's and Wilco's of today (including Coldplay and Wilco) out there doing the mega tours every 2-3 years keeping this model afloat.
Posted by: AJ | July 28, 2010 at 06:02 PM
It's very simple really. The same thing that brought down the record business is bringing down the concert business: GREED. Just like overpriced CD's did the record industry in, overpriced live shows are doing in the concert business. Fans are sick and tired of "handling fees", "convenience fees", "print out fees", etc. On top of that, overpriced tickets, parking fees, concession fees, etc. The arena experience has long lost its glow. It is an overpriced corporate event that has had a longslide of diminishing returns. You could rip off fans so many times before they stop going to these too expensive events. Istead they are discovering smaller more intimate venues that afford a great time for $10-$20. They may not be the Eagles, but they may offer fans a more immediate and exciting fun time than those slick "superstar" shows ever could.
Posted by: Casey M | July 28, 2010 at 11:20 PM
Here's another example of how to best allocate your concert dollars in today's economy. Come out to pastoral Three Oaks, MI this SATURDAY, JULY 31, for Robbie Fulks & Jenny Scheinman, Archer Prewitt (of The Sea and Cake), Bottomless Pit, Freakwater,Scotland Yard Gospel Choir, JC Brooks and the Uptown Sound and more! Come out and hear some terrific music, see (and buy) some great arts, crafts and jewelry and have some yummy food and drink! Only $20 advance - http://www.wavelengthmusicfest.com/
Posted by: evadsivad | July 29, 2010 at 10:10 AM
i think the fact that livenation and ticketmaster merged really reduced competition and allowed them to make ever inflating concert prices for dinosaur acts their business model. that being said, it's not turning out to be much of a business model because people don't want to pay an arm and a leg for jurassic park.
also i think the tweens and young kids who normally control the music industry have been living in this recession for two years now and are ok with not getting tickets to every jonas brothers concert.
greg, i think that even though this article had some pretty obvious points to some readers, it is a point well worth being made nonetheless. people will pay $300 for a fest like Coachella, $200 for a fest like Lolla, $100 for a fest like Pitchfork. it's hard to spend that kind of money on something one show at the allstate for one act.
Posted by: j | July 29, 2010 at 10:41 AM
The worst night at the Hideout is still better than the best day at Lollapalooza.
-- MrJM
Posted by: MrJM | July 29, 2010 at 01:50 PM
Jeff needs to calm down.
Posted by: POA | July 29, 2010 at 02:15 PM
It will be nice to see the demise of the corporate national concert promotion companies and the return of regional players. Big corporations have sucked the life out of the radio business, the record business, and now the concert business.
Posted by: pottery | July 31, 2010 at 08:57 PM
This may be a summer of belt-tightening but the Music Industry has already done that "suck it in" maneuver almost a decade ago. The regional offices disappeared [I'm speaking from Ohio, an ex-regional office for the major labels] and staff at almost all levels was pared down significantly.
Live shows and package tours have been the bread and butter for artists sales but really has never been an appreciable part of income derived from being in the "business'. Unless you're Bob Dylan, U2, The Further Fest or Phish you have to resign yourselves to the reality being that money is actually derived from music sales and not live performances. Live Nation may be a short term profitable (???) investment but it's long term value is in real question: and no, I have never invested in that marketing scheme.
Posted by: John McNea Platter Puss Records: Owner | August 02, 2010 at 12:13 PM