35 Years & $317 Billion Later, Apple Intends To Dominate a Post-PC World

On April 1, 1976, Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne established a small company to sell personal computer kits hand-built by Wozniak. That company, as you probably know, was Apple Computer.

Thirty-five years later, Apple is now the most valuable technology company in the world. Its market capitalization exceeds $317 billion, trumping longtime rival Microsoft by more than $100 billion. And Apple’s iconic products sit on the desks and in the pockets of millions of people across the world.

Most people know bits and pieces of the Apple story, but the company has a complicated history. Some of us may not know, for example, that Apple had a third co-founder, Ronald Wayne, who got cold feet and sold his 10% stake in Apple less than two weeks later. Everybody knows Steve Jobs, but they may not know Mike Markkula, one of Apple’s first angel investors and the company’s second CEO.

In the 35 years of Apple’s existence, the company has gone through hell and back. The launch of the Macintosh in 1984 and the coinciding “1984″ Super Bowl commercial remain symbols one of Apple’s highest points, but only a year later, then-CEO John Sculley forced Steve Jobs out of the company. A decade later, in 1996, the company was on the brink of destruction when it acquired NeXT and brought Steve Jobs back. In 1997, Microsoft invested $150 million in Apple to keep it afloat (something it probably now regrets), and soon after came Apple’s golden years with the iPod, iMac, MacBook, iPhone and now the iPad.

We don’t necessarily want to dwell on Apple’s past; you can visit Wikipedia if you want a lesson in Apple Inc.’s history. Instead, let’s focus on what Apple might do in the next 35 years.


What’s In Store For The Next 35 Years?


For the last 35 years, Apple has almost always been the underdog. While it languished, Microsoft flourished. In fact, Apple surpassed Microsoft in market cap for the first time last May.

For the next few decades, however, the technology titan will be incumbent. Apple has a giant target on its back, and it’s not just Microsoft taking aim. Apple also faces challenges from Google, Amazon and a plethora of mobile device manufacturers. While Apple is handily beating its competition today, the status quo could change at any moment.

And while Apple fends off Android, PCs and competing tablets, it has its eye on creating a post-PC world. Rather than compete on hardware specs, it competes on design and user experience. Its a world of mobile devices that Apple intends to dominate for decades to come.

Leading the charge is Steve Jobs, not only the company’s CEO but also its heart and soul. While he’s currently on medical leave, he did show up for the unveiling of the iPad 2, demonstrating things aren’t as dire as previously rumored.

Still, Apple will some day have to continue its quest to redefine technology without its iconic leader, and many question whether anybody can provide the design and product vision Jobs has imparted on the company he founded 35 years ago.

Even if you aren’t a fan of Apple products, it’s tough not to be impressed with what Apple has been able to accomplish since 1976. We wonder what products it will create and challenges it will face in the next 35 years. Right now though, the sun is definitely shining down on Cupertino.

Print Story Email Story

More Stories in Tech & Gadgets

Top Related Stories

  • Ricardo

    lots of successful years to come.

  • http://www.jeffreychew.com Jeff Chew

    Apple fanboy fapping material.

    Next!

  • http://www.threeboy.net Threeboy

    Pirates of Silicon valley is a fun movie to watch.

  • http://www.facebook.com/iso.samuel ‘Sam Iso

    A stronger competition will emerge. Companies hardly holds a position for long.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah this doesn’t make sense.

    1. It seems that Apple stock depends on Jobs and Ives, they lost $30-$45 dollars in one week, when Jobs took a leave of absence and the Ives leaving rumor.

    2. It seems that Apple doesn’t care about marketshare, just user experience If that’s the case, it will be the same thing as computer and laptops. Android or Microsoft will get the majority of the share will Apple will hold 15% or less.

    History will repeat itself yet again. The only difference here is Google won’t sit and twiddle it’s thumbs like Microsoft did with computers and laptops(until windows 7). Every version of Android brings something new to the table, just look how far it’s evolved since Android 1.1. Google has outdone itself, and will provide excellent and affordable smartphone to the majority of consumers.

  • http://www.facebook.com/cwcalabrese Corey Calabrese

    I own a mac, use to own an iPhone so I have no hatred for Apple, but why aren’t more people using Android??? It’s exponentially better. It doesn’t make sense to me. Is it because Apple is trendy? Because they do everything for you? It’d be more beneficial for people to educate themselves then combine capitalism and socialism like the iPhone and iPad has so obviously done.

  • http://www.facebook.com/cwcalabrese Corey Calabrese

    I own a mac, use to own an iPhone so I have no hatred for Apple, but why aren’t more people using Android??? It’s exponentially better. It doesn’t make sense to me. Is it because Apple is trendy? Because they do everything for you? It’d be more beneficial for people to educate themselves then combine capitalism and socialism like the iPhone and iPad has so obviously done.

  • http://twitter.com/werenolf markus

    please delete this.

  • Anonymous

    Looks like only the Apple haters are showing up so far – At least through the first 7 or so comments.

    Next!

  • Anonymous

    Looks like only the Apple haters are showing up so far – At least through the first 7 or so comments.

    Next!

  • http://twitter.com/johncorfee John Corfee

    You’ve got to be kidding me? The small company known as Apple who has dissed Microsoft for being a monopoly and now look what they have become a big giant cult, all of the fanboys don’t see it because your part of it.

  • http://twitter.com/vladnet VLAD

    I Love Apple

  • Michael A Fuselier

    Pretty sure that $150M Microsoft gave Apple wasn’t even close to needed to save the company. I think they had over 7 billion in the bank at the time. I am pretty sure in fact it was a payoff to settle out of court a case about stealing QuickTime source from Apple and passing it off as Windows Media Player that they were about to loose. They also agreed to keep developing MS Office (which probably did actually help save them) til 2002, if I remember correctly. Can anyone corroborate my memory please?

  • http://twitter.com/im_zeeshan Zeeshan

    Apple’s products are amazing but I hope Apple finds a way to add a little variety to their products, because currently the apps are diverting the user’s attention from the ‘need for variety’. Everyone someday is going to have a MacBook, an iPad, an iPhone, an iPod. Ofcourse it streamlines technology, but at the cost of variety!

  • http://www.twitterlive.net Sergio101

    If Microsoft invested 150 million in 1997, that investment must worth who know how much today…

  • http://twitter.com/tkvalleau Tracy Valleau

    I wish people would quit floating that “Microsoft’s $150 million saved Apple.” NONSENSE. Apple had 6 or 7 BILLION dollars in the bank at the time. The $$ settled a legal matter.

  • http://www.memwah.com/ Memwah

    I am not a huge fan of Apple but its impossible not to respect their innovation.

  • http://twitter.com/tomegnome SETh! Roberson

    I personally wonder why so many people use Android. I’m a desktop linux user and I can’t stand Android. My top phone operating systems are: WebOS and WP7.

  • http://michaeladebose.collected.info/ Michael A. De Bose

    I’ve been using Macs since the nineties. Most of that time I recall getting ridiculed and laughed at for being a fan of the Mac. It’s great to see Apple doing well. They make great products.

    Ironically the more popular they’ve gotten the more ridiculous their policies have become and my “fandom” if you will has had to make room for my consternation. I still love Apple but strangely it’s become Microsoft only MS never had an OS as good as Apple’s. I wish that Apple realized that it’s achieved what it has through innovation of it products. Me thinks that when the only thing a corporation knows how to innovate is the profit model while relying on lawyers and “EULA”-type policies to remain relevant, not only do you look like old Media, oh and Microsoft, you end up where they are one day too.

    I’ll continue buy Macs until I’m building something better. Like Microsoft, I too hear the call of ARM. After all the nxs that run on it, why not.

  • http://twitter.com/oenomel James Hunt

    I am in no way an apple fanboy, I have never owned any apple products. However I can completely respect them and thank them for turning up the competition. Do you really think without the iPhone coming out we would have such a wide range of devices available now. I love my Droid X and wouldn’t think about switching over to and iPhone, but I’m pretty sure most of us would still have basic cell phones if Apple hadn’t forced all these other phone manufactures into seriously upping the R&D. Also, if Google hadn’t been a partner in the original iPhone, maybe they never would have gotten into the mobile market, we’ll never know, I’m just thankful the competition keeps going, now if we could only get the providers to start innovating and competing and lowering these prices :-(

  • http://policyabcs.wordpress.com/2011/04/02/35-years-and-317-billion-later-apple-intends-to-dominate-a-post-pc-world/ 35 Years and $317 Billion Later, Apple Intends To Dominate A Post-PC World | PolicyABC's "POLICY THINK SHOP"

    [...] More via 35 Years and $317 Billion Later, Apple Intends To Dominate A Post-PC World. [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus