Get Back- The Beatles

@mastermusician hummm why say a guy is gay ?

@mastermusician I HATE THE Beatles but John Lennon was first gay in music it was a bi-sexual thing as John Lennon liked Women and Brian back then He did have sex with brian after bath tub even brian admitted this before his death in late sixties Even took john to gay bars ...I Know Freddie was gay but he was same bi-sexual in his early years but i dont see why someones sexuality got to do with debate ?

@mastermusician you brought it up someones sexuality has nothing to do with music mate

@Prestonpiemincher Let me tell you what I think about you. You're one of those idiots who thinks that music should be a particular way and only follow a singular path. You're also one of those people who hates something just because everyone else loves it, and you just want to make yourself different that way. The Beatles wrote such amazing music, and this comes from a musician's point of view. They were using chord progressions that you would otherwise not hear in popular music. Stop hating.

The Stones, of course, are still going. While, admittedly, they haven’t done anything worthwhile in the last twenty years, they continued growing as a band way after The Beatles split and put out great album after great album well into the 1970s and even one (Tattoo You) in the 80s as well.

OK, We Give Up

The Beatles lasted about six years, giving us a few good albums and lots of great singles. And then, well, they just gave up because they couldn’t really be bothered anymore. Listen to ‘Let It Be’ and you’ll hear the sound of a band who can’t be bothered.

In The Studio…No One Can Hear You Scream

The Beatles may have been a fairly good live band, but they threw a strop somewhere around 1965 because the screaming was too loud and they couldn’t hear themselves properly.

The Stones would have just bought bigger amps. Let’s face it, from the footage available, it’s clear that The Beatles weren’t anywhere near in the Stones league as a live band. The Stones were, probably even still are, the greatest live act in rock n’ roll.

The Stones, however, always had an authentic touch when playing differing styles of music as their career developed. They could do blues, country (‘Wild Horses’, etc.), reggae, rock…everything they did sounded right. Largely because Keith Richards just has a natural affinity for music in a way that McCartney and Lennon didn’t.

The Beatles, by contrast, just played pop music and, um, music hall.

The Stones were little more than a derivative blues band, while The Beatles were innovators.

The thing is, at the outset of both bands career, both were little more than copyists. The Beatles just played the latest pop hits (Twist and Shout, etc.) while The Stones played the blues.

CHRIST EVEN ROLLING STONES ARE BETTER THAN THIS pop trash crap

Self-Indulgent Rubbish

While The Stones are responsible for the execrable ‘Satanic Majesties Request’, there is nowhere near the level of self-indulgent rubbish as that churned out by The Beatles.

‘The White Album’, for example, is four good songs plus an hour of tiresome half-written rubbish, like ‘Why Don’t We Do It In The Road’.

Is this really the work of the best band in the world ever? Nope…it’s just rubbish from a bunch of self-indulgent millionaires.