www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

SUBSCRIBE TO NEW SCIENTIST

ad
Short Sharp Science: A New Scientist Blog

Why was Neil Armstrong first on the moon?

neil.armstrong300.jpgHenry Spencer, computer programmer, spacecraft engineer and amateur space historian

Forty years ago today, Neil Armstrong made the first footsteps on the moon. Was there some reason it was him in particular?

There were two men aboard the Eagle when it landed: Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin. Who would make the first footprints on the moon?

After the crew selection was announced, NASA delayed saying anything about who was going to be first out. That fuelled press speculation that it would be Armstrong because he was a civilian – at the time, the US military wasn't highly regarded in many eyes. Indeed it was Armstrong, who has since kept a famously low profile, turning down requests for interviews or speeches on the subject – but not because he was a civilian.

As plans for the first lunar landing started to be made, nobody had really thought about who would be out first. Indeed, different people were making different assumptions.

The closest precedent was the Gemini programme, which made 10 crewed flights in 1965 and 1966. The programme had featured several spacewalks that were always done by the junior man (the "pilot"), while the commander stayed inside. So some of the planners assumed that Aldrin would be first out on the moon.

Others noticed that this situation was different. For one thing, both men were going out – the only question was the sequence. Gemini had assigned the spacewalks to the pilots because, with less responsibility for the overall mission, they could specialise more easily. That didn't apply for Apollo, with both men outside.

For another thing, being first man out on the first lunar landing was rather obviously a bit more important than being the spacewalker on a Gemini. The people who would be doing it cared a lot more about the answer.

From colleagues' accounts, Aldrin really wanted to be the first man out. Chris Kraft, head of Mission Control at the time, wrote in his memoir: "Buzz Aldrin desperately wanted that honor and wasn't quiet in letting it be known."

As an Air Force pilot, Aldrin said he was upset by the press speculation that Armstrong had the inside track as a civilian. The US military might be in disrepute in some quarters, but that shouldn't be a consideration in a decision like this.

In the end, boss astronaut Deke Slayton handed down the decision: the first man out would be Armstrong. But it would not be because he was a civilian; there were two other considerations that were much more important.

First, if there were no technical reason for one man or the other to lead the way, Armstrong would have priority simply because he was the senior astronaut. He was from the second group of astronauts, recruited in 1962, while Aldrin was from the third, recruited in 1963. All by itself this was a compelling argument; seniority meant a lot in Slayton's astronaut corps.

And second, in fact there was a technical reason for Armstrong to go first. The real decision had already been made, by some anonymous design engineer. The Lunar Module's moonwalk hatch was below and in front of the astronauts, and was roughly square. It hinged inward, with the hinges not at the top or the bottom, but at one side – the pilot's side. It swung open away from the commander and toward the pilot. So when the hatch was open, Armstrong had a clear path to manoeuvre out through the opening, while Aldrin was penned in behind the hatch.

In the LM's cramped cabin, in clumsy spacesuits, the only practical way out was from Armstrong's side. Once Armstrong was out, Aldrin had to close the hatch again, slide sideways past it, and only then open it – from Armstrong's side of the cabin – for his own exit.

The only way that Aldrin could go out first was for the two men to swap places before opening the hatch. This wasn't quite impossible, but it was very difficult; when Armstrong and Aldrin tried it in an LM mockup, they damaged some of the cabin equipment! The commander simply had to go first.

Aldrin was visibly unhappy with the conclusion, but couldn't argue with the reasoning. Neil Armstrong would be the first man on the moon.

(Image: NASA)

Facebook iconDigg iconDelicious iconStumbleUpon iconTwitter iconTechnorati iconReddit iconAddThis icon
Subscribe to New Scientist Magazine

Post a comment

31 Comments

I can understand Aldrin's frustration, but at least, he got to walk on the Moon that day. Micheal Collins was orbiting alone around the Moon while these two guys did this historic walk, and I always wondered what he was thinking about it :)

 

@Eric L: here's a good article about how Michael Collins felt in orbit.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/19/michael-collins-astronaut-apollo11

 

In his autobiography, Collins takes the position that, as a professional astronaut, he understood and accepted his support role, which was vital to the mission. He later turned down a chance to command his own Apollo mission and walk on the Moon.

 

I forgot to add... he also took some pride in the fact that for a few hours he was the most solitary human being who had ever lived.

 

I was under the belief that the psychologist looking after the astronauts chose Armstrong to be first as he was the more subdued / modest of the two men. Hence wouldn't lose his head with all the publicity etc. once back on earth. (Although the seniority / seating arguments in the article seem somewhat more plausible)

 

If you read the transcript, you get insight into their personalitities, and you could understand why between the 2 in the LM, Armstrong would be the choice. Armstrong is highly professional and objective-oriented, whereas Aldrin seems grandiose and often wanders to irrelevancies. Not that their personalities factored into the decision, which apparently they didn't, but still the one better equipped to handle the honor did actually get it.

Also, in the transcript, CAPCOM at one point joked that Collins (being on the far side) was the only man in the universe who couldn't tune into the action. Splendid.

Here's a link to the transcript: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11transcript_pao.pdf

 

DLH, That was nice. Most alone for a few hours but WOW where were billions on Earth focussed at that time; only on one human and never again since that time.

 

In the late 1980s, I attended a Conference at Brighton, I think, which was attended by Buzz Aldrin as a guest speaker. In the main reception area in an informal address to the conference attendees, Buzz told us that prior to the famous small step for man, both he and Neil Armstrong had been out of the Lunar Module. He said that each of them had been out to set up and test the televising equipment for the big PR event and that it had been him, in fact, who had been the first to step on the moon. I seem to remember that it was reported in the local newspaper the next day. Was anyone else there, or heard of this story? If it is true, then maybe this is the reason Neil Armstrong has been so famously reticent to hold interviews or talk about it.

 

I was at the conference - I don't recall that part. I do recall that the most animated part of the discussion was the toilet technology of the time - or lack of it!

 

To ShiftFrame .. if indeed Buzz had been first out prior to the "PR event" then that would invalidate this article that points to the fact it would have been "very difficult" for the two men to swap places.

I can't help but feel Buzz has never managed to come to terms with the whole moon walk experience. His personal life has suffered tremendously because of it.

I am not suggesting for one moment that it would not have a profound effect on most people and maybe that was one aspect NASA never fully understood. I have read somewhere that 8 of the 9 who returned from walking on the moon "got religion" afterwards.

This effect may have the clue to why Armstrong stays very private over the whole event.

 

Great to read one of the brightest pieces of the human history.

I still remember the famous comics character - Tintin - who had also landed on moon as the first of the human kind as in the comics.

May the human civilization proceed and live long.
-- Mark (Far infrared sauna)

 

There must be a full record, second by second of all the moon mission, so if Aldrin went out first to reharse the landing, there must be a record somewhere (but if they had to reharse, why would they not do it in the sequence planned for the PR event?).
Then I wonder what is true and what is fiction about what the astronauts felt and feel, what the space experience left to them, if they became religious because of space. There is a lot of clever story telling on this as on many other human enterprises, and this is the way legends are borne.

 

Matt, I have often wondered if I dreamt it, because I have never seen any reference to it anywhere else and Buzz can't have mentioned it in his books or it would be all over the place by now. I am not one of those conspiracy nuts, but it would make sense that the camera would have to be some way from the Lunar Module for those photographs, wouldn't it? Maybe, as difficult as it was to change places, they did it for reasons that we don't know.

 

Matt, I have often wondered if I dreamt it, because I have never seen any reference to it anywhere else and Buzz can't have mentioned it in his books or it would be all over the place by now. I am not one of those conspiracy nuts, but it would make sense that the camera would have to be some way from the Lunar Module for those photographs, wouldn't it? Maybe, as difficult as it was to change places, they did it for reasons that we don't know.

 

Shiftframe, the camera was mounted to a platform on the LEM, which rotated down into position before egress. It was fully automatic - there was no camera on the surface - nor was there a need for anyone to go out and set it up prior to egress.

 

Thanks for that HangGlider. At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy freak. Could it have malfunctioned and Buzz had to go out and fix it? It was, after all, probably the biggest PR event ever before or since for Mankind and there were a lot of people watching.

 

Neil! Buzz! Aldrin!

 

The camera was on an automated extension arm. When Neil first went out on the "porch", he reached over and pulled a lever to extend the camera into place. Once it was fully extended and active, he went down the ladder to the surface. Neil was first.

 

Great article, Henry.

It should be pointed out that Aldrin went to sleep stretched across the front cabin and Armstrong slept on the Ascent Engine cover in the Mid Section of the LM. This was done with no difficulty - they did it fully suited in altitude chamber tests on Earth as well. The lighter gravity made it even that much easier. I believe, had the hatch in fact been designed to rotate the other way, into the Commander's station, that the crew would have switched and then the Commander would have gone out first. There was precedent in seat switching when the Commander had control of the abort/emergency flight control during launch and then switched seats with the Command Module Pilot for the rest of the flight.

I believe the technical excuse was to easily mollify an unbalanced individual - a crew switching operation to cope with a "wrong" hatch would have been harder in the case with Apollo 11, but any of the other LM Pilots would have handled it professionally - even if they were supremely lucky to walk on the moon but be only second.

 

None of this matters to be honest, because the moon landing was fake anyway!

 

Why Neil is not being vocal is quite surprising? Whatever be the cause, it points towards a mystery.

 

To Richard, who attended the same conference as me and didn't remember what I did. It was at an informal address in the hotel lounge bar that he (Buzz) stated what I said. Maybe he had had one or two dinks too many and he was pulling the legs of us, or, more likely, the journalists that were there. As already stated, they were completely alone and only they know what really happened and we will probably never know. Thanks to everyone for the comments that have been made.

 

Who really pushed for the moon mission? We traditionally credit JFKennedy. A commitee headed by L Johnson is credited for bring him the idea. While they certainly deserves some credit - there must have been one or more less well known people who shaped the concept and sold it to these folks. Anyone know who?

 

americans are so selfish person. at that time when armstrong was on the moon that time two more guys were with him, one from rusia.nill's teacher uri gagarin who taught armstrong about space world but american does not gave any value to uri gagarin.there is no any comment about uri gagarin and his moon journey along with nill armstrong on website.

 

I think this info is realy cool and I used it alot for my project

 

I was nine at the time, actually, ten days before my ninth birthday, full of curiosity and possessed of a great interest in science even at that tender age. How I pity those pathetic disbelievers, unable to feel the pride of accomplishment of man and of country that July 20th back in '69. While it is true that time has changed perspective on many events in my life, there is no amount of fact twisting, 1984 truth bending, or National Enquirer style "interpretations" that can rewrite the truth of the greatest achievement of that era-man's landing on the moon. Conspiracy theories attempt to grow on barren soil when it comes to the moon landing but there were those who believed the world was flat too. Evidence, if examined objectively, and not with an eye to make it fit a preconceived idea, is after all, what science is all about, and it is that kind of real science that made the moon landings possible.

 

Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little homework on that. And he in fact bought me lunch because I found it for him

 

Very good text. I've found your site via Google and I'm really glad about the information you provide in your articles.

 

Would you be interested in exchanging links?

 

I heard the moon landings that we saw on tv were actually staged and faked. The real moon landings were kept a secret from us b/c then we would know that there is life on the moon.

 

In his autobiography, Collins takes the position that, as a professional astronaut, he understood and accepted his support role, which was vital to the mission. He later turned down a chance to command his own Apollo mission and walk on the Moon.

 
Twitter Follow us
Twitter updates
Recent comments
ad
© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.
ad
Quantcast