www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

  • Site Search
  • Search Local Business Listings

N.J. senators, Amtrak official to announce new commuter train tunnel project across the Hudson

Published: Sunday, February 06, 2011, 10:59 PM     Updated: Monday, February 07, 2011, 7:52 AM
tunn.jpgU.S. senators Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg will on Monday announce plans for a new trans-Hudson Tunnel similar to the ARC Tunnel, whose construction, above, was canceled by Gov. Chris Christie last year.

TRENTON — Amtrak’s top executive and New Jersey’s two U.S. senators Monday are expected to announce an alternative to the Hudson River commuter-train tunnel that was killed by Gov. Chris Christie in October.

The "Gateway" tunnel proposed by Amtrak would largely follow the same footprint as the canceled nine-mile Access to the Region’s Core tunnel from Secaucus to New York City, but connect to new tracks in an expanded New York Penn Station instead of dead-ending deep under West 34th Street, representatives for U.S. Sens. Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez said tonight.

Detractors referred to ARC as the "tunnel to Macy’s basement" for its proximity to the landmark department store and supposed lack of connectivity to other transit hubs in Manhattan.

The Gateway tunnel would allow 13 additional NJ Transit trains per hour — from 20 to 33 — and eight more Amtrak trains. The ARC project would have allowed 25 extra NJ Transit trains per hour.

"I’m in my late 60s, and I was just hoping and praying I’d see the day when there would be another Hudson River tunnel," New Jersey transportation expert Martin E. Robins said. "My hopes have been rekindled."

Many hurdles will have to be overcome, including finding federal and local funding for a project that could cost upwards of $10 billion. But Amtrak officials say they believe the tunnel fits in well with President Obama’s vision for infrastructure improvements in America and high-speed rail in the Northeast Corridor from Boston to Washington, D.C.

gateway-tunnel-project.jpgView full size

The hope is to have the Gateway tunnel built in a decade.

News of the announcement was first reported today on NJ.com, The Star-Ledger’s real-time news and information site.

Amtrak this week is expected to ask the federal government to fund a $50 million engineering study on the Gateway plan. The project also could benefit from the engineering work done previously for ARC.

Amtrak President and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Boardman, Amtrak board member Anthony Coscia, Lautenberg and Menendez are expected to present the alternative tunnel plans during a news conference at 11 a.m. Monday at the Hilton Newark Penn Station.

Amtrak had intended to build another tunnel to improve capacity in the nation’s most congested rail corridor, but not until 2040. The killing of the ARC tunnel expedited the Gateway tunnel plans.

Citing projected cost overruns that would leave New Jersey taxpayers on the hook, Christie pulled the plug on the nation’s largest public works project on Oct. 27.

Lautenberg immediately began working with Amtrak to revive the trans-Hudson rail tunnel project, which he says will benefit New Jersey’s commuters by giving them transfer-free train rides to prosperous jobs in Manhattan, increase property values along the rail line and put contractors to work.

"New Jersey is facing a transportation crisis," he said. "Our commuters are fed up with train delays that make them late to work and endless traffic that traps them on our highways when they want to be home with their families. When the ARC tunnel was canceled, it was clear to me that we couldn’t just throw up our hands and wait years to find another solution."

New Jersey always rises above challenges, Menendez said in a statement tonight. "While some choose to do nothing and accept delays, the people of New Jersey cannot, will not, and must not wait. We are moving full steam ahead with this strong investment in New Jersey and the region. We are on a path to create good-paying jobs and move people and goods more quickly."

Some transportation officials think the Gateway plan makes more sense than expanding the No. 7 subway line from New York City to Secaucus Junction, an idea floated over the last three months by the staff of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Under Amtrak’s best-case scenario, the No. 7 line would also be extended to Penn Station, between 31st and 33rd streets, two blocks west of the Empire State Building.

Along with the Gateway project would be a plan to raise and replace the decrepit, century-old train Portal Bridge between Kearny and Secaucus over the Hackensack River. The condition of the bridge limits train speeds and the span is so low that it often has to be opened to allow commercial boats to pass under, causing more delays.

When the ARC project was being considered in the 1990s, Amtrak was in a fight for survival with the federal government and couldn’t assist New Jersey. The Gateway tunnel represents a historic change of direction for Amtrak, Robins said.

"The lead will now be Amtrak’s lead," said Robins, director emeritus of the Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center at Rutgers University. "It could have been this way, had history been different."

"This is not ARC," he added. "In some respects, it is a lesser project. But it is still a very significant project. There will be benefits that will reverberate throughout New Jersey. This can be a wonderful alternative."

Gov. Chris Christie and the tunnel project Gov. Chris Christie and the tunnel project Gov. Chris Christie says the offer for the ARC tunnel project was a 'nice start.' Video by Saed Hindash/The Star-Ledger Watch video
Related coverage:

Gov. Christie plans to use ARC tunnel money to pay for repairs to N.J. bridges, roads

Gov. Christie cancels ARC tunnel for second time

Allegations against N.J. transportation chief on violating ethics on ARC tunnel project are dismissed

N.J., Port Authority paid $95.5M to lease land for ARC tunnel project one week before Gov. Christie canceled it

Sweeney frets feds might withhold millions for N.J. because Christie balked at paying tunnel bill

Complete coverage of the Hudson River tunnel project


Sponsored Links




Comments Feed

View: Oldest first | Newest first
  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next comments »
Andrea Dealmagro February 06, 2011 at 9:28PM

That project is a GO in my perspective. We must expand and modernize our infrastructure.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
cactusjoe February 06, 2011 at 9:38PM

I think it's something that needs to be done. The growth of the city and NJ commands it. However I'm not willing as a NJ taxpayer to fund the bulk of it and as an amtrak project it looks like I wont.
I would be willing to fund another bridge to relieve congestion on the cross Bronx. I see that as a matter of saftey after 9-11 we need a faster entrance/exit from NYC for traffic.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
llumpirenj February 06, 2011 at 10:06PM

Hello? Fiscal Responsibility, are you there? Christie killed the tunnel project because it is not affordable. The Federal Deficit is at record levels, and we propose spending another big spending deal? Cut Defense spending, cut these new projects, raise taxes. Yes, I said it, raise taxes on EVERYONE. Sorry to say the dreaded word, but it must be done. Our nation will go bankrupt otherwise. Obama inherited a deficit, and he's tripled it. Get out of Afghanistan, cut aid to other nations that isn't required by law. We must do it. Federal employees must be cut.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
BennyFranklin February 06, 2011 at 10:10PM

fiscal responsibility? like a $260 million handout to casinos? bailout of horse racing?

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
ripping February 07, 2011 at 1:26PM

There was no hand out here, if the Revel casino project actually gets done then the state will credit the casino with a $260 million dollar tax credit to use for the casino and infrastructure work on the area around the Casino and Ocean area.
Many construction and casino jobs will be created if the casino gets finished, and they will get no tax credit unless the casino is finished,after that they will contribute many more millions to the state and city in taxes and levy's.
People just need to read the Press of Atlantic City article on line for Sunday 2/07/11 to get the truth about the tax grant. (Opinion Page)
Don't let people who are gouging the taxpayers with pay and benefits try to fool you into thinking this project is not good for the, State, Atlantic City, and the workers in construction and service industries that it will support.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Justin February 06, 2011 at 10:52PM

Yes, companies should pay some more. However, personal income taxes should ONLY be raised on people making 10 million and more. I don't think anyone else should have their taxes raised.

The federal government NEEDS to cut costs. The defense budget needs to be cut by 30 percent. Medicaid needs to be cut by at least 30 percent. And, more people need to be hired to INVESTIGATE FRAUD. Medicaid fraud costs the government (and by extension, us), BILLIONS of dollars a year. The tax code, however, needs to be revamped so it's more equitable. I read that trucking companies, on average pay an effective tax rate of 33 percent. On the other hand, pharm and tech companies usually pay around 10 percent.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Outspoken2u February 07, 2011 at 12:25AM

@llump - I agree that defense spending needs to be cut. But...the reason the deficit APPEARS larger under Obama than Bush is because Obama put the cost of the wars on the books. Bush did not do that. You haven't mentioned what Iraq cost us. Also if you care to look, your taxes went DOWN twice under Obama. Have you seen that under Christie yet? No, and you won't. Conservatives falsely call Obama a socialist saying that he has the intention of re-distributing wealth. Christie has done a VERY GOOD job of re-distributing wealth to the wealthy and taking everything from the poor. We have to look at the WHOLE picture, Mr. Umpire.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Ramparts February 07, 2011 at 8:21AM

OUTSPOKEN. - The reason the deficit APPEARS larger under OBAMA is because it IS LARGER under Obama. The war has NOTHING to do with it.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
dave February 07, 2011 at 10:31AM

Yikes. Are you one of those conservatives that still thinks the wars are "paying for themselves"?

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
truth1 February 07, 2011 at 4:10AM

To llumepirenj: Is funding a new casino in AC in line with fiscal responsibility?

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
sadinnwk February 06, 2011 at 10:56PM

Sounds like a whole bunch of nothing....it will never get done
Christie would fund it and the repub in the house Wil not allow am track to fund it. this is the political scam that keeps given first corzine tried to used it to get re elected now Mendez is trying to use this an his speech to the NJEA to lock up the unions

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Andrea Dealmagro February 07, 2011 at 9:10AM

This is one of the reasons why we must undertake these type of investments in our future. This tunnel is all about New Jersey's future. With all the reductions is government I propose, we can do it.

http://www.nj.com/mercer/index.ssf/2011/02/firms_name_a_portent_as_genesi.html

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Andrea Dealmagro February 07, 2011 at 9:14AM

If NY and the US see momentum on our side, they will join in the project.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Jacek February 07, 2011 at 11:08AM

I will only support this project if it is funded equally by all. I would like to see funding in this form:

50% federal funding
20% NY funding
20% NJ funding
10% Amtrak

With ALL overruns funded by the federal government. I will ONLY support the project if the funding looks something similar to this. Not 10% funding by feds, 90% by NJ and all overruns by NJ. That's ridiculous.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
republicann February 07, 2011 at 1:53PM

How about 100% funding from people who will ride the train. Stop sending me bills for other peoples' choices. If the cost is too high for someone who uses the service to pay for it, then DON'T BUILD IT.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next comments »