A sequel not worth waiting for
Beau Garrett, left, and Garrett Hedlund star in Disney's "Tron: Legacy." |
'TRON: Legacy' — 2 stars
The results impart that "trapped" feeling all too well. It's a sullen affair, dominated by a grim visual palette that intrigues for about 30 minutes. Thereafter I found myself wishing I could switch over to different, peppier 1982-derived artifact, something on the order of Atari Pole Position.
The movie does begin promisingly. I saw the 3-D version of "TRON: Legacy," and in that version the black-light-style Magic Kingdom corporate logo alone looks groovier than any of the 3-D in Disney's recent smash, "Alice in Wonderland."
The early sequences do nicely with establishing 27-year-old Sam Flynn's entry into his missing father's universe, the innards of a digital grid. There, as it was in the '82 version, the games are deadly, like variations on "Rollerball" played inside a laser-tag emporium. The remake, like the original, stars Jeff Bridges as the computer visionary Kevin Flynn, now older, with a beard, still spouting the "like, man" Zen bits of wisdom and the notion that information should be "free and open." A digitally futzed Bridges also plays Clu, Flynn's self-created alter ego, manipulated so that he appears not to have aged since the first "Tron" opened to disappointing box office returns.
This is one of those big-budget projects destined to split audiences (a good thing, always). Directed by Joseph Kosinski, who did the "Halo" and "Gears of War" commercials, "TRON: Legacy" comes to life when Sam, played by a too-cool-for-school Garrett Hedlund, learns the ways of the Lightcycles and the perilous joys of racing on "ribbons of light." Here, we get the sweep and simple excitement we need. Elsewhere, we get exposition more sluggish than the stuff we had to wade through in the second and third "Matrix" movies, and a strained, opaque brand of intellectual-property mythology that might mean tons to ardent fans of the first "Tron," but less to others.
I did enjoy the camp turn from Michael Sheen, though. He plays a sinister chap who runs a stylishly low cocktail lounge inside the grid, and who refers to our inexpressive young hero as a "pretty miss," swanning around like Annie Lennox lost in space. Egregious stereotype? Probably. But by the time Clu amassed his army and the showdown showed up, I was surprised how much I missed him.
mjphillips@tribune.com
MPAA rating: PG (for sequences of sci-fi action violence and brief mild language)
Cast: Jeff Bridges (Kevin Flynn); Garrett Hedlund (Sam Flynn); Olivia Wilde (Quorra); Bruce Boxleitner (Alan Bradley); Beau Garrett (Gem); Michael Sheen (Castor)
Credits: Directed by Joseph Kosinski; written by Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz, based on characters created by Steven Lisberger and Bonnie MacBird in "Tron" (1982); produced by Sean Bailey, Jeffrey Silver and Steven Lisberger. A Walt Disney Pictures release. Running time: 2:06.
Comments (2)
Add / View comments | Discussion FAQI was fortunate to see the IMAX 3D version at Navy Pier this past Monday (12/13) as part of a promotional effort by Disney. Honestly, it was a fun movie. Not necessarily a great movie, but fun.
If you didn't see the original or don't remember it, you're likely to miss out on some inside stuff. They try to introduce Tron and CLU (it's an acronym, not a name) through flashbacks, but it's some very minor backstory stuff. If you don't pay close attention, you'll miss the identity of a major character (not going to spoil it here) and his/her significance in the movie.
There's also a cameo appearance by a young-ish Hollywood star who's very presence absolutely sets the stage for yet another sequel. Again, if you're not familiar with the first movie, his existence in this one will fly right over your head.
If you enjoyed the first one, you'll like this. If not, you may miss out on some bits of plot development, but it's still a fun movie. There haven't been many this year that were as immersive. As for the 3D, we (that saw it) agreed that it added little, but took away nothing. It would likely look almost as good without it, but it doesn't get in the way at all.
First.
This looks to stink.
Copyright © 2010, Chicago Tribune