Peter Aldhous, San Francisco bureau chief
Update: Since we posted this blog, DeCode has apparently removed the assessment of Alzheimer's risk from its analysis for 23andMe customers
Nothing seems to be going right for DeCode Genetics, the Icelandic personal genomics firm that declared bankruptcy last month. In an attempt to win customers from its Californian rival, 23andMe, DeCode has offered free analyses for anyone who uploads their 23andMe data onto its website - only to produce mangled interpretations for genetic ancestry.
More alarming, from my point of view, the company also suggested that I have a 40 per cent lifetime risk of developing Alzheimer's disease - which if didn't know better thanks to previous scrutiny of my own DNA, would have been a devastating thing to learn.
Offering a free version of your main rival's service might seem like a strange business move. But as the Genetics Future blog pointed out, DeCode's gambit made some sense as a pitch for future sales. Within the next few years, the personal genomics business will move from offering limited scans of the genome to full readouts of the 3 billion or so letters in our DNA code. So if DeCode can convince 23andMe's customers that its analysis is more informative, then it may win their business when it's time to upgrade to complete genome sequences.
Fred Pearce, environment correspondent, Copenhagen
Captain America is coming to the rescue. That's how Todd Stern, head of the US delegation to the Copenhagen climate talks, sees it anyhow.
Having brushed away the Bush years, Obama's envoy is now keen to dispel any ideas that the US is not in the vanguard of fighting climate change. Certainly ahead of Europeans who are, as ever, living in the past - literally, in this case.
Stern's big trick, as outlined at a press conference today, is to obliterate the 15 years from 1990 to 2005 during which US carbon emissions soared. If you put those to one side, he said, Uncle Sam looks pretty good.
Fred Pearce, environment correspondent, Copenhagen
China came to Copenhagen offering to cut the carbon intensity of its economy - or the amount of carbon dioxide it produces per Yuan of GDP - by more than 40 per cent within a decade. That's a big promise, and other developing nations like India are offering to follow suit.
So what if all nations forgot about emissions cuts and instead opted for some kind of carbon intensity target?
Let's start by saying this is not a likely option, nor a desirable one. Global carbon efficiency targets are not the way to address climate change because they set no absolute caps on emissions. CO2 emissions can keep rising so long as GDP rises faster.
But there's a point to the exercise: the numbers make it clear that you can be rich without emitting vast amounts of CO2.
Catherine Brahic, Environment news editor, Copenhagen
Five hours, zero degrees centigrade, no food, no water. Snow flurries. Dozens of large (very large) Danish police manhandling the crowds, arms linked to form human walls and cordon off the hundreds of waiting people, who teetered between hilarity and fury.
The scene was repeated at the various gates to the Copenhagen climate conference, from 7 am this morning to when the doors closed at 6 pm. I waited five hours in the blistering cold to get in, and I was among the lucky ones. My colleague, Fred Pearce, waited nine before the gates were shut before his nose. Above him a digital sign fastidiously counted the growing number of climate refugees around the world. He'll have to do it all again tomorrow.
"It's not the Danish, it's the UN," one staff member muttered under her breath when I finally made it in.