www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Fifth Circuit upholds religious rights of American Indian kindergartner

By Staff reports

AUSTIN – A federal appeals court recently upheld a lower court ruling that the Needville Independent School District violated Texas state law by punishing a 5-year-old American Indian kindergarten student for wearing his hair in traditional braids as a form of expressing his family’s religious beliefs. The case was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Texas.

“We feel vindicated in our belief that no parents should be forced to choose between their religion and culture, and a public education for their children,” said the boy’s parents, Kenney Arocha and Michelle Betenbaugh. “We are grateful to the ACLU of Texas for its support in this long fight. As parents we are relieved that our son can continue his education without being shamed for his beliefs.”

U.S. District Court Judge Keith P. Ellison in January 2009 granted a request by the ACLU and the ACLU of Texas that the boy, known in court proceedings by his initials A.A., be allowed to wear his hair at school in two long braids in observance of his religious heritage. School officials, who had initially placed the student in in-school suspension for violating the school district’s dress code requiring boys to have short hair, appealed the ruling. The lawsuit was filed Oct. 2, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Needville is a small town near Houston.

“We are gratified that the appeals court affirmed Judge Ellison’s ruling protecting the rights of this child and his parents. This is an important victory for all Texas schoolchildren, whatever their religion,” said Lisa Graybill, legal director for the ACLU of Texas. “Under Texas’ Religious Freedom Restoration Act, schools must accommodate student religious beliefs in their dress codes – and that applies as equally to Catholic students’ right to wear a rosary or Jewish students’ right to wear a yarmulke as it does to our American Indian client’s right to wear his braids.”

“Public schools should not be in the business of punishing children for harmless expressions of their religious and cultural heritage,” said Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “We are pleased that the appellate court’s decision safeguards this family’s fundamental religious liberty.”

The decision was issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Lawyers in Arocha v. Needville Independent School District include Graybill, Mach and cooperating counsel Sinead O’Carroll of Reeves & Brightwell LLP in Austin.

A copy of the memorandum and order may be downloaded online.

2:55 PM Maria wrote ...

I have a hard time believing this story has anything to do with being or not being Indian. If the boy's hair was clean, who cares that it was long and in braids? There's so many kids who come to school unprepared: dirty, hungry, no supplies, homework not done, etc. And there's so many kids who don't come to school at all. Why pick on the kid? If ain't broke, don't fix it.

47984814
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

4:01 PM mean&uglymask wrote ...

well, it looks like religious persecution to me, irrespective of 'indianness', a petty and almost meaningless point. it looks like the same movement to do away with the face veil of the middle east women. for 'indians', this is attack on personal freedom.

47876889
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

3:29 PM Lucille wrote ...

Please pray for the US of A. We are in need of prayer for our school children as well as our elders in every tribe. This nation is being attacked by their own people. Health issuses, Property,enrollment issues, Republicans Democrats, Leaders in general all need prayer.

47873939
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Sunday, Jul 18 at 11:51 AM ndn gramma wrote ...

oh if you are not a tribal member then be quiet.these goofy people that say they are Indian and have no tribe and no real upbringing should just stop trying to be Indian

47810679
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jul 17 at 8:59 PM Enrolled Native wrote ...

Curt J: Your comment isn't on topic but I feel compelled to respond. Tribes, not nonNatives or the US Gov, say who is and who isn't Native. If a person is accepted by a tribe as Native then that is the tribe's call, likewise if the tribe determines a person is nonNative. No other entity has that right/privilege. As far as "becoming" federally or state recognized goes, I have to agree with you that the current system is very questionable. If your people were a tribe since time immemorial, have been continuously a tribe ever since and have exerted their sovereignty and nation-to-nation relationships with the British/French/Americans then your people have been recognized since first contact. US Fed recognition just put the fact into law. "Tribes" seeking recognition today (with very few exceptions such as the Little Shell Band of Chippewa) are little more than groups of thin-blood descendants seeking a quick route to establishing a casino. Now, back to your regularly scheduled program.

47779259
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jul 17 at 6:45 PM CurtJ wrote ...

Why do non natives have the right to say who is Native or not? The Dept. of Interior is nothing but opportunist gold diggers who are in collusion with entities and individuals utilizing Native lands. Colonialism is the invasion of weaker countries to steal their natural resources and lands for colonization. With the enslavement of the indigenous inhabitants. Theft and Murder. Look at the terrorist attacks on the U.S. Those are the results of the policies of theft and murder.

47773589
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jul 17 at 2:09 PM Interesting Addition wrote ...

Correction to previous post. The last line should have read "This case was not about tribal enrollment, it was about a person's right to have their religious beliefs protected."

47762114
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jul 17 at 2:08 PM Interesting Addition wrote ...

No, you do not have to be federally recognized to have Indian heritage or spiritual beliefs. That is exactly the point of this ruling: Every person has their religious rights protected. This case was not about tribal enrollment, it was about a person's right to not have their religious beliefs protected.

47762039
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jul 17 at 1:20 PM NDN wrote ...

So you have to be federally recognized to have indian heritage and spiritual beliefs? The U.S. has no right to recognise anything Indian.

47759434
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Saturday, Jul 17 at 11:04 AM Interesting Addition wrote ...

Not mentioned in the article is the boy's tribal affiliation -- He doesn't have one! The boy's dad claims Apache via family stories but has no proof. This was as of the time the boy was first being asked to cut his braids 2 years ago. In recent reports the boy and his father (his mother is nonIndian) are affiliated with the Lipan Apache Band of Texas, neither a state or federally recognized tribe.

47751562
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

By posting a comment, user agrees to all Terms Of Use. Comments may also appear in other website locations and in other Indian Country Today products, without notice and at the discretion of Indian Country Today.

Indian Country Today and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

On Demand

Quantcast