www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Deepwater Horizon: Conservationists warn of 'true catastrophe' for wildlife

Oil drifting ashore along the Gulf of Mexico coastline will affect key breeding grounds for seabirds as well as fisheries, wildlife bodies say

In pictures: Wildlife affected by the oil spill
Interactive: species under threat

Deepwater oil spill

Booms have been deployed in a bid to prevent the flow of oil leaking from the Deepwater rig reaching the Louisiana coastline. Photograph: Liz Condo/AP

Conservationists monitoring the spread of oil from the Deepwater Horizon rig across the Gulf of Mexico say the situation is at risk of turning into a disaster for the biodiversity in the area. Coastal areas around Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida will all potentially be affected by the spill.

Oil that drifts ashore will impact on important breeding grounds for seabirds and many other species, according wildlife experts. Oyster and lobster fisheries could also be badly hit.

"It seems to me yet another man-made environmental tragedy on our hands," said Martin Spray, chief executive of the UK Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust. "The coast of Louisiana has about 40% of the US coastal wetlands so it's a seriously important area. These are incredibly important for their fisheries as well, so there are human livelihoods involved as well."

"The terrible loss of 11 workers may be just the beginning of this tragedy as the oil slick spreads toward sensitive coastal areas vital to birds and marine life and to all the communities that depend on them," said Melanie Driscoll, a conservation director based in Louisiana for the US National Audubon Society (NAS). "For birds, the timing could not be worse - they are breeding, nesting and especially vulnerable in many of the places where the oil could come ashore."

Efforts to stop the oil before it reached shore may not be enough, she said. "We have to hope for the best, but prepare for the worst, including a true catastrophe for birds."

Chris Mann of the Pew Environment Group said: "The Exxon Valdez oil spill provided a mass of scientific data on how oil affects marine life, ecosystems, coastal communities, fisheries and subsistence economies – the effects extend far beyond the inevitable photographs of seabirds, marine mammals and fish covered in oil."

Important bird habitats at risk in the Gulf of Mexico include Chandeleur Islands, Gulf Islands National Seashore in Louisiana and Mississippi and the Active Delta in Louisiana.

The brown pelican, the state bird of Louisiana, nests on islands in the Gulf of Mexico and its breeding season has already started this year. The NAS said many pairs are already incubating eggs. Other species at risk include terns and gulls that nest on the beach, including the Caspian tern, royal tern, laughing gull and the black skimmer. These birds roost on the beaches and also plunge into the water to feed on fish and other marine life. They are therefore at risk from oil on the surface of the water or if it washes ashore.

Similarly, the American oystercatcher, Wilson's plover and snowy plover feed on invertebrates on the beach and could find their sources of food at risk if oil ends up on their sands.

Ocean-dwelling birds such as the magnificent frigatebird could also be affected by oil on the surface of the water that could damage their feathers.

Migratory birds such as plovers and sandpipers are currently on their way from wintering grounds in South America to their breeding grounds near the Arctic. They usually rest and refuel in the Gulf of Mexico on their long journey across the world.

If the oil flows east, it will encounter the seagrass beds that form a key habitat for manatees, among other species.

Carl-Gustaf Lundin, head of the marine programme at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) told the BBC: "If you've got seagrass beds badly contaminated, clearly the manatees could be seriously affected." Less than 2,500 adult manatees remain in the area and are already at risk from climate change and disturbance by boat traffic.

Mann said that the effects of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska in 1989 can still be found along the beaches in Prince William Sound more than 20 years after the accident. "And research has shown that polyaromatic hydrocarbons - components of crude oil that are highly resistant to weathering - are also highly toxic to marine life."

The accident could also been seen as a warning for those wanting to drill for oil in the Arctic circle, around Alaska. "With decades of experience in drilling in the gulf, and response equipment nearby, the gulf is one of the 'safest' places to drill," said Mann. "If Deepwater Horizon can happen there, it can certainly happen in the Arctic Ocean, where bitter cold, ice, and extreme wind and wave conditions are everyday facts of life and response equipment would be days or even weeks away."


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
  • mb1962 mb1962

    30 Apr 2010, 7:37PM

    I have some NEW'S for all of you.How long did you think the planet itself was going to let you continue to distroy it? Now you watch the planet end the lives of the guilty for this eco disaster.Mistake or not,watch what happens to all of us now.You stupid Fools!

  • kickitup kickitup

    1 May 2010, 2:49AM

    My fellow Americans concern will not be with the plight of the wildlife. Rather, their top concern will be whether this will make their big freaking SUV's more expensive to fill. And look at Limbaugh today, insinuating that the rig was blown up on purpose by environmentalists. Stupid Americans will believe him and once more become pawns of big business. I'm just sick today - and so sad.

  • AustEcopaul AustEcopaul

    1 May 2010, 7:49AM

    Disgusting!!! We all must share guilt for caring so little for the Planet - God's Creation, not ours.
    i looked up this Rush Limbaugh fellow. (Goto photo of Moses parting the sea.) He was born in southern USA, and says that Halliburton poured concrete for the oil well. See Rigzone and Halliburton.

    The COASTAL CRISIS TV report on the disaster is great informative journalism.

    Meanwhile, it's a mutinational fiasco. BP of London owns 65% of the well, with Houston-based Anadarko Petroleum 25%. (Andarko doesn't even mention the catastrophe on it's Website). Heavyweight Swiss offshore driller Transocean drilled the Louisiana well (Deepwater Horizon) 40 miles offshore.
    Source: Business Week

    This is an environmentally sensitive area with ten wildlife refuges., The explosion and sinking comes after a Chinese coal ship took a short cut accross the (World Heritage) Great Barrier Reef and ran aground - with a predictable slap on the wrist from Australia.

    Oil companies are great polluters. Despite PEAK OIL EXTRACTION, they insist on taking more oil from the ground and helping to create seismic activity. We consumers too insist on buying oil derivatives and plastics. They stop investigation of alternative technologies.

    If public relations corporations don't massage us into eco-complacency, this Crisis should propel environmentalism to each of our brains. The Crisis should be really bad news for all abusers of the sea - from Japanese whalers to oil drillers to car drivers to amateur fishermen.

    Losing Louisiana (Aljazeera, 2009, 2min) to Sea Rise & Climate Change

    This is also posted on my WebSite banjapan.wordpress.com

  • mothmoth mothmoth

    1 May 2010, 8:06AM

    Although Exxon Valdez was a huge and awful event, it seems to me that this Deepwater one is being played out much more in the glare of internet spotlights, which bring brilliant satellite pictures and discussions with various experts closer to everyone's attention.

    There is nowhere for President Obama to hide, either - and the decisions made by the rig-builders to cut corners when designing safety devices have already entered the public consciousness. BP shares have taken a nosedive on the stock markets and the message is getting across to people that they can choose to invest ethically as a gesture with far-reaching impact.

    This morning, every corner shop and launderette worldwide will have little groups of people talking about that oil business, that country's energy choices compared to our own and how we might vote, the pricelessly fragile environment, & its beautiful wildlife we know will suffer.

  • Halo572 Halo572

    1 May 2010, 8:38AM

    So Tesco use Esso, with the associated stopessso campaign and I believe that Sainsbury's is BP, although I there is no direct confirmation of that.

    I don't use Tesco because it is Esso and I should stop using Sainsbury's now, but then the alternative is a more expensive BP station anyway.

    Ethical petrol purchasing seems to be rather a minefield, but as a consumer I have to do something against a company that has allowed this to happen.

    But who is the best devil to deal with?

  • mothmoth mothmoth

    1 May 2010, 9:33AM

    @Halo572

    There isn't really an ethical way to purchase petrol. Use less, that's all. And if you have stocks and shares then don't let them be in the oil industries.

    Over on the motoring thread is a discussion including news about running cars for maximum mpg & on recycled chip fat.

    Apart from that , there's bikes or the train/bus!

  • NeverMindTheBollocks NeverMindTheBollocks

    1 May 2010, 2:07PM

    could one of you kindly explain, without resorting to the hyperbole in the above comments, exactly what ethical principles are violated by all oil companies?

    The notion that "There isn't really an ethical way to purchase petrol" is nothing more than a slogan that sounds good to those who believe such things, but is meaningless to anyone else.

  • RudyHaugeneder RudyHaugeneder

    1 May 2010, 9:39PM

    No surprise, other than it took so long coming. We have been warned for decades that catastrophes such as this were inevitable and unstoppable.
    The Gulf Coast oil spill disaster is just one of a series of environmental calamities that have occurred -- take the China pre-Olympics coastline and lake cleanups, river oil spills since. And that's just one part of the planet where human eco-disasters have/are happening.
    And Africa. Eco-disasters are so common they are, like on many other continents, no longer worthy of but a day or two, at most, coverage.
    Then don't forget the slowly evolving but constant human-accelerated climate change and how this impact grows daily in hardly perceptible and constant change that we, as a species, are hard pressed to keep up with.
    Then there are the new things that are pending -- the deadly byproduct results of GM, genetic modification of plants, animals, poultry and other birds, fish, even viruses and bacteria: huge doomsday disasters only a breath away, but nobody knows which breath.
    The reason: At the time of Columbus, there were 500-700 million people on the plant; 2.7 billion at the time of the Kennedy assassination; 7 billion today and 9 billion by 2050 -- a mere four decades.

  • Tangleroot Tangleroot

    1 May 2010, 10:17PM

    Sad and sickened as I am, I'm also not surprised. How long was it before the Exxon Valdez disaster slid into the depths of the collective American barely-conscious? Not long. And yet 23 years later Prince William Sound has not recovered.

    Hubis and willful negligence. My rage and dying hope for the planet nurtures a perverse desire that since this is a catastrophe anyway, let it be truly enormous. Please let all eforts to stem this oil bleeding from a wound deep in the seabed fail! Let this be a lesson that nobody can fail to ignore, or fail to see in the context of global environmental responsibility.

    I also have a growing fantasy that this is an act of Gaia--that the Earth is out of patience and fighting back; a notion no less plausible than the idea that humankind has been given a stewardship over our garden as an invitation to rapine.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop

Guardian Jobs

UK

Browse environment jobs

USA

Browse environment jobs

  • Loading jobs...

jobs by Indeed job search