Comments
On GB's tears with Piers, and my emotional moment with Marr
2010-02-07 16:04:56
Some commentators are already suggesting GB must have gone into his interview with Piers Morgan with his express purpose of crying over the loss of his daughter.
I have not seen the interview but I have seen Gordon in the past get very emotional indeed about losing his first child, and about the fact that one of his two sons has a disease which means he and Sarah may face the tragedy of losing a child for a second time. Who wouldn't for heaven's sake?
He is, for a public figure, an intensely private man, who finds much of the stuff of modern politics and the modern media sometimes difficult to deal with.
But he knows that some who live outside the political bubble are as much interested in who he is as what policies he has for the country, with some unlikely to listen on the second unless they know a bit more about the first.
When TB did a Des O'Connor interview on ITV in Opposition, many of the papers and broadcasters attacked him, saying it was a way of avoiding tougher questioning. But given he was forever taking on the supposedly tougher interviews, that was always self-serving rubbish from a political media elite which thinks it should have a monopoly on setting the agenda.
The reason I was always keen for TB to do programmes like that, and why I support GB doing one with Piers, is that it is important for top flight politicians to reach as wide an audience as possible, on as wide a canvas as possible.
When TB ever did Newsnight or the Today programme, people inside the Westminster bubble would have it as a point of reference for a few hours, maximum a day. We had people mentioning, and writing to us, about Des O'Connor, for weeks and weeks.
GB will not have enjoyed opening himself up in the way it sounds like he did. But there is no harm at all in people seeing that when all is said and done, he is flesh and blood the same as everyone else.
I had a bit of an unplanned 'moment' myself this morning, which judging by the volume of traffic online seems to have been noticed. I thought hardly anyone watched those Sunday politcal shows any more.
With a new novel out - Maya, which I may have mentioned here a few times already - I had agreed to do Andrew Marr on the BBC and Adam Boulton on Sky, and I knew of course I could not expect them to restrict the interviews to me talking about what a rollicking good read my novel was (even if the reviews are saying exactly that).
So of course I had expected the kind of questions Marr put on Iraq. I had also been telling myself that given the history between me and the Beeb over Iraq - and Marr was central as he was their political editor at the time of the war, and a key player in the agenda they sought to set - I must not lose my temper, or reopen old wounds.
Fair to say I just about managed it, but it was a struggle. I could certainly have done without his glib introduction, in which he sought to link the September 2002 WMD dossier with the novel, ie my 'latest piece of fiction'.
But the reality is there is no question on Iraq I have not been asked many many times, and I guess it does get frustrating to be asked them again and again, knowing that most people have made up their minds one way or another. For years, we have been accused of lying when we know we didn't. For inquiry after inquiry, we've faced perfectly legitimate questions which we have answered as best we can. I have been at four inquiries now, and though the first three cleared me of the serious allegations of wrongdoing I faced, it is never good enough for those who opposed what we did.
Marr claimed he had no opinion or agenda, but it was exposed in the way he casually threw in a highly disputed figure about casualties - four to five times higher than the Iraq body count accepted by most organisations as the most reliable. As to his claim that his figure was backed by the UN, that was news to me and I suspect to them.
Journalism is supposed to be about seeking after truth. But I really do believe now that on this issue, every aspect of which has been gone into for so long and in such detail, most of the media are no longer interested in the truth at all. They are interested in those parts that fit their analysis - that the decision to invade Iraq was a mistake and the consequences have been disastrous.
There is another point of view but what I felt once more this morning is that whereas I can see how people reached the decision that we should not have taken military action, the critics refuse point blank to see how the other point of view could possibly have been adopted. And they cannot even merely accept that a 'wrong' decision was taken - they have to believe there was duplicity or conspiracy behind it too.
So if I appeared lost for words, it was perhaps because there is nothing more to say, and if I had said what I was really thinking about the way the media has been covering the inquiry, and the way they cover public life more generally, I might have regretted it. So I let my mind race for a while, controlled the emotions surging around, then carried on.
I was glad to have the chance to explain why I got emotional by going straight to Adam Boulton's show. As I said, I do sometimes feel that people in public life are now treated by the media as though somehow they are devoid of humanity, do not have feelings, do not really care about anything.
To be fair a lot of the comments doing the rounds online seem fair and reasonable, and the reactions on social networking sites mainly friendly and supportive.
But we now live in an age where people can pass instant comment on events as they happen. So before seeing the interview with GB, they can make judgements that suggest venality in his crying over his daughter's death. Or imagine that I went onto a programme this morning to show a touchy feely emotional side to emphasise I am now as much a novelist as political operative.
In fact what happened was that Marr asked a question, and I was struck by the insight that he had precious little interest in the answer, and the exasperation button was duly pressed.
BUY A BOOK AND RAISE CASH FOR LABOUR ... HALF OF PROCEEDS FROM SALE OF THE BLAIR YEARS GOES TO LABOUR http://www.alastaircampbell.org click on bookshop
Archive
Let's give Cameron a Doris Day moment over AshcroftPublish date: 2010-02-10 10:29:05
Time for Maya's voice to be heard amid the non-tearsPublish date: 2010-02-09 09:04:22
Marr needs to explain his 'sexed up' question re casualtiesPublish date: 2010-02-08 13:55:36
On NI, Tory fears of Labour spinsters, and headbands in sportPublish date: 2010-02-06 10:00:25
Daily Mail tells truth shock horrorPublish date: 2010-02-05 08:54:36
Welcome to the virtual Maya launch partyPublish date: 2010-02-04 10:38:44
Public ahead of press on the mess that is CameronPublish date: 2010-02-03 13:52:26
Cameron winning on media support but losing on leadershipPublish date: 2010-02-02 10:47:50
Buy The Blair Years and raise cash for LabourPublish date: 2010-02-01 09:00:00
A lesson in campaign mindset from young Labour studentsPublish date: 2010-01-31 13:14:19
Media tweets show the real agendaPublish date: 2010-01-29 21:18:59
TB made a judgement, and is defending it wellPublish date: 2010-01-29 14:04:38
On inequality, special advisers, Ireland, and TB/IraqPublish date: 2010-01-28 13:45:08
Message machine Mandelson on form todayPublish date: 2010-01-27 12:15:42
Only one place to be tonightPublish date: 2010-01-26 09:20:26
Cameron and tweeting ought to be natural fitPublish date: 2010-01-25 11:55:58
Big bucks campaigning not what it's cracked out to bePublish date: 2010-01-24 10:28:57
A life in unemployment statisticsPublish date: 2010-01-22 09:39:21
Learning the wrong Iraq lessons for Afghan warPublish date: 2010-01-21 10:24:46
Denis MacShane MP on the rewriting of history re Iraq warPublish date: 2010-01-20 10:44:07
Darling v Gove, Osborne and help the rich squad is No ContestPublish date: 2010-01-19 10:12:27
Dacre's DownfallPublish date: 2010-01-18 03:30:21
Rebutting the good and the bad, and support from football fansPublish date: 2010-01-17 12:45:38
Mandela is a great man, Invictus a great filmPublish date: 2010-01-16 08:54:48
Is Paul Dacre hiding a guilty secret that explains his deranged paper?Publish date: 2010-01-15 09:56:24
What's the real fight to be had?Publish date: 2010-01-14 10:20:20
On Owen Coyle and Brian LawsPublish date: 2010-01-13 18:27:58
Thanks to friend and foe alike for helping yesterday go byPublish date: 2010-01-13 08:49:25
So far so good in campaign to remove discriminatory lawPublish date: 2010-01-11 09:48:15
Thanks to Will Hutton for talking sense on 'class war'Publish date: 2010-01-10 12:56:48
In defence of airbrushed postersPublish date: 2010-01-09 16:45:29
Fire is always best turned on the ToriesPublish date: 2010-01-07 15:41:19
On Hoon-Hewitt and John PrescottPublish date: 2010-01-07 00:55:10
Sad and baffled to see Coyle goPublish date: 2010-01-05 16:26:05
Cameron's wobble the product of his team saying what their audiences want to hearPublish date: 2010-01-05 10:50:58
New Tory slogan - if you've got the cash, splash it on crap adsPublish date: 2010-01-02 12:11:18
And the musicians of the decade were ... The Beatles and The KingPublish date: 2009-12-31 18:52:25
Prepare for avalanche of Ashcroft posters for ToriesPublish date: 2009-12-30 15:06:06
Here's Good Luck to you, Mrs RobinsonPublish date: 2009-12-29 12:22:42
One man's White Christmas joy is another's football disasterPublish date: 2009-12-24 13:36:05
My favourite fact of the day - a French decimal time systemPublish date: 2009-12-23 16:48:00
A few crisis management tips for EurostarPublish date: 2009-12-22 11:49:35
Do we need same approach to booze as smoking?Publish date: 2009-12-19 09:13:28
Prepare for tears, tantrums and an imperfect but miraculous Copenhagen conclusionPublish date: 2009-12-18 10:23:03
London 2012 and Copenhagen today ... different approaches to tight deadlinesPublish date: 2009-12-16 11:13:21
Tiger cut off at the knees. I bet he'll be backPublish date: 2009-12-14 11:03:17
Cameron Shameron on the need for new laws to clarify Ashcroft tax statusPublish date: 2009-12-13 17:06:56
When poor mental health creates great art ...Publish date: 2009-12-12 15:21:13
Giggs gets my Sports Personality vote, but I'll miss the big momentPublish date: 2009-12-11 13:56:15
Tough day for Labour, but tough questions for Tories tooPublish date: 2009-12-10 10:03:13
Alistair Darling's quiet authority key part of recovery.Publish date: 2009-12-09 11:03:25
Clegg risks squeeze as election nearsPublish date: 2009-12-08 15:30:58
Copenhagen really matters. Guardian front page sets scene wellPublish date: 2009-12-07 10:26:33
Four years on, what do we think of Cameron's leadership?Publish date: 2009-12-06 13:55:17
Boris and Waddles, an everyday tale of Tory croneyismPublish date: 2009-12-05 09:53:35
The Speaker's wife is a credit to him, and spot on about Cameron's ToryismPublish date: 2009-12-04 10:52:37
PMQs win for GB was a direct result of Cameron's strategic failurePublish date: 2009-12-03 08:21:10
Cameron's conkers add to his problem with serious opinionPublish date: 2009-12-02 10:59:45
Sarko at risk of riling Obama and GB. Cameron on conkersPublish date: 2009-12-01 10:29:48
The life and death of the man who made the link between exercise and healthPublish date: 2009-11-28 11:37:29
Even top Tories think Dave and Co can't do piss up in a breweryPublish date: 2009-11-27 20:51:29
Well done BBC Inside Sport. Shame on media for news blackout on Coulson bullying casePublish date: 2009-11-26 13:59:57
Well done BBC in Mental Health Media awards. Looking forward to Inside Sport on depression tonightPublish date: 2009-11-25 10:26:22
BBC main bulletin blackout on leaders' speeches bizarrePublish date: 2009-11-24 10:17:48
Business right to be worried about Tory axe on RDAsPublish date: 2009-11-23 10:17:12
Why should Brown and Cameron apologise for being seen to pay tribute to the war dead?Publish date: 2009-11-22 11:12:38
Beware climate change denial dressed up as 'commonsense'Publish date: 2009-11-21 12:54:27
Something for the weekend - a long lazy blog lifted from interviewsPublish date: 2009-11-20 12:35:23
If France and FIFA won't act on Thierry Henry, let's have a boycott of Gillette razorsPublish date: 2009-11-19 10:09:00
Never in the history of human taxation has so much been promised from so many to so fewPublish date: 2009-11-18 18:32:39
Tories far from 'effete and unfamiliar' when it comes to twisted tax prioritiesPublish date: 2009-11-18 09:52:12
Two very different stories of depressionPublish date: 2009-11-17 17:17:11
Congrats to Ellie on PPB campaign, and Willy Hague on getting van RompuyPublish date: 2009-11-17 11:40:14
Private schools worse than State schools - unless it's drugs you're after. DiscussPublish date: 2009-11-16 12:10:25
Fiona Millar 5 Toby Young 0Publish date: 2009-11-15 13:18:38
Where we fight we winPublish date: 2009-11-13 11:22:00
Good luck to Number 10 on 'lobby' review. And a big NO to the other PRPublish date: 2009-11-12 14:39:11
Robert Enke RIP. May his death increase understanding of depressionPublish date: 2009-11-11 17:59:53
On the exploitation of grief to get GordonPublish date: 2009-11-11 08:59:01
Why Tories are not home and dry, and wrong to call GB callousPublish date: 2009-11-10 13:00:20
Labour needs more of the winning mentalityPublish date: 2009-11-09 10:30:44
The scandal of friendship and the shame of Who Wants to be a Millionaire?Publish date: 2009-11-07 10:53:53
US clarity of strategy required for full explanation on AfghanistanPublish date: 2009-11-06 10:31:48
Just because he is French doesn't mean he's wrongPublish date: 2009-11-05 10:58:46
Congratulations to David Cameron and Trevor KavanaghPublish date: 2009-11-04 10:34:36
Is there a Sun blackout on Cameron's dumping of 'cast iron guarantee' on Europe?Publish date: 2009-11-03 20:37:04
Johnson seems to get it on immigration. Right on advisors advising tooPublish date: 2009-11-03 11:58:59
Public opinion on climate change - the public might be the problemPublish date: 2009-11-02 11:37:23
In praise of Stephen Fry, who should tweet or not as he sees fitPublish date: 2009-11-01 09:29:34
John Sergeant spot on re TB. TB's Olympics legacy. Liam Gallagher's generosityPublish date: 2009-10-30 11:50:44
Conservative contortions on Europe and BlairPublish date: 2009-10-29 11:44:12
Two-jobs Osborne suffering credibility deficitPublish date: 2009-10-28 09:14:22
Canaries win AC spin award with dark nights productivity surveyPublish date: 2009-10-27 09:41:48
Blair - dead big in Japan!Publish date: 2009-10-26 17:21:17
No complacency, variants on a themePublish date: 2009-10-24 09:48:46
Griffin may have been dreadful, but there can be no complacencyPublish date: 2009-10-23 11:57:29
Margaret Hodge MP on how to fight the BNPPublish date: 2009-10-22 16:48:39
Thanks to Charlie Falconer and Dominic Grieve - yes, I know he is a ToryPublish date: 2009-10-21 17:24:18
On Biscuitgate, barmy Tory policy, and BNP v GeneralsPublish date: 2009-10-21 10:36:15
More on Obergruppenfuhrer Dacre, Biscuitgate and Bullingdon ConservatismPublish date: 2009-10-20 12:16:37
Biscuitgate and Susan Boyle, no win territory for GBPublish date: 2009-10-19 12:31:00
Hating the Mail - a mindset worth havingPublish date: 2009-10-17 11:28:12
A line by line guide to the Mail statement on Gately article outragePublish date: 2009-10-16 19:12:36
Hit the Mail where it hurtsPublish date: 2009-10-16 16:36:02
Talking Cameron and Obama with US Democrats. Progressive Convervatism? No, he can'tPublish date: 2009-10-16 10:02:40
Inspired by kids' green passionPublish date: 2009-10-14 18:24:13
Good news on leukaemia, good news on student activismPublish date: 2009-10-13 08:24:21
Musings from Bertie Ahern, and how I won the Nobel prize for literaturePublish date: 2009-10-12 09:26:18
Continuing double standards in the mediaPublish date: 2009-10-11 11:36:21
The best policies in Cameron's speech were those of Labour Big GovernmentPublish date: 2009-10-08 17:07:40
Tongues slipping all over the placePublish date: 2009-10-08 09:00:07
Cameron confuses strategy and tactics and puts Union at riskPublish date: 2009-10-07 10:29:26
Osborne inspires apathy at BBC LeedsPublish date: 2009-10-06 16:01:59
Let's see more of the Tory candidates pleasePublish date: 2009-10-06 09:23:11
Labour needs to fight on record to stop Tory vandalismPublish date: 2009-10-05 14:28:40
VacuDave goes all peevish at difficult questions. Bring on the debatesPublish date: 2009-10-04 23:33:52
Lots of joking around in Jersey, though nothing as hysterical as Dave's Europe positionPublish date: 2009-10-03 10:31:22
On The Sun, Obama in Copenhagen and Alistair McGowan on the looPublish date: 2009-10-01 10:59:49
Sun switches ain't wot they used to bePublish date: 2009-09-30 10:17:14
Darling and Mandelson show what I mean by authenticityPublish date: 2009-09-28 16:28:18
Serious Politics 1 Low Journalism 0Publish date: 2009-09-27 11:55:54
Media's love for Cameron should be turned into a weaknessPublish date: 2009-09-26 10:30:03
Time for ministers to stand up and fightPublish date: 2009-09-25 09:40:26
Today's media double standards watchPublish date: 2009-09-24 09:29:45
Breaking News - GB wins award, Lib Dems face all waysPublish date: 2009-09-23 09:43:49
Why authenticity is the key to comms, and why Merkel will winPublish date: 2009-09-22 08:29:13
Why I love NHS walk-in centresPublish date: 2009-09-21 12:13:03
Here goes with the smoked SalmondPublish date: 2009-09-20 10:40:21
Breaking News - Cameron's vacuousness an impersonator's nightmarePublish date: 2009-09-19 11:06:09
Cameron has an army of spin doctors - aka journalistsPublish date: 2009-09-18 10:07:06
On Scottish independence, Cameron's short-termism, and Jimmy Carter being rightPublish date: 2009-09-17 09:56:56
Is Cameron Alex Salmond's Trojan Horse?Publish date: 2009-09-15 10:13:42
On the TUC, Roy of the Rovers and Anna WintourPublish date: 2009-09-14 11:04:46
Memo to Apple boss Steve JobsPublish date: 2009-09-13 17:36:31
A day in the life of a (crap) City traderPublish date: 2009-09-11 17:52:25
Defend record with pride, attack Tories with gustoPublish date: 2009-09-10 11:06:36
Cameron's Conservatism beyond parodyPublish date: 2009-09-09 10:38:00
On transforned cities, and tales of Princess Di and Laura BushPublish date: 2009-09-08 09:45:54
Labour should put minister up against Griffin on Question TimePublish date: 2009-09-06 12:39:56
School speech the latest source of right-wing frothing at ObamaPublish date: 2009-09-05 08:23:02
More horse's mouth, less Beeb blah pleasePublish date: 2009-09-04 22:49:20
Real respect for sport can be Olympic legacyPublish date: 2009-09-04 09:27:34
First ladies watch out for Japanese bombshellPublish date: 2009-09-03 10:47:19
TV debate - good idea in theory, but ...Publish date: 2009-09-02 15:37:43
'No worries' - the new response to thanksPublish date: 2009-09-01 12:25:19
Tremors of Japanese political earthquake will be felt far and widePublish date: 2009-08-30 15:50:54
Pressure on Ed Miliband can help get a climate change dealPublish date: 2009-08-28 13:39:08
Why Tories and media cannot stomach GCSE success storyPublish date: 2009-08-27 16:03:34
Exposing the absurdity of Chris GraylingPublish date: 2009-08-26 13:20:19
Joy and beauty and a night of magicPublish date: 2009-08-20 10:55:11
Twitter NHS backlash good for ObamaPublish date: 2009-08-14 15:44:49
A lifetime's ambition fulfilledPublish date: 2009-08-08 16:59:02
Breaking the blog-a-day spell as warm up to holidayPublish date: 2009-07-20 17:44:49
No hiding place from Twitter, me on the bike, JP in DCPublish date: 2009-07-17 18:17:09
At last - something Obama cannot do wellPublish date: 2009-07-16 10:05:47
Will MPs take the lead in the debate on euthanasia?Publish date: 2009-07-15 12:30:01
Berlin brothel leads the way to a greener worldPublish date: 2009-07-14 10:57:25
A time for GB to explain the whole picturePublish date: 2009-07-13 12:37:54
All hail Monty, Jimmy and Collie!Publish date: 2009-07-12 20:06:36
First triathlon of the summer for me, education award for FionaPublish date: 2009-07-12 09:43:06
Of Burnley's friendly and Obama's wandering eyePublish date: 2009-07-11 12:38:52
Two great early morning momentsPublish date: 2009-07-10 10:27:07
Cameron had better be sure he's rightPublish date: 2009-07-09 11:06:22
Guardian scoop has big questions for press, cops and CameronPublish date: 2009-07-08 20:40:54
Divisive legend: Lance ArmstrongPublish date: 2009-07-07 10:38:23
First hug a hoodie, now grab a gayPublish date: 2009-07-06 12:57:09
Mail on Scumday's wonderful account of Lansley's kipperdomPublish date: 2009-07-05 13:14:51
Ecclestone undermines his own success with alarming views on HitlerPublish date: 2009-07-04 14:04:04
When the conmen move more quickly than the councilPublish date: 2009-07-03 10:19:52
Andrew Lansley done up like a kipperPublish date: 2009-07-02 10:10:52
A day spent interviewing footballers, then being interviewed by a transvestite comedianPublish date: 2009-07-01 14:47:40
When the power of black eyes fadesPublish date: 2009-06-30 09:24:59
Farewell to Henry HodgePublish date: 2009-06-29 20:41:12
Honouring the power of sport to do goodPublish date: 2009-06-29 14:49:42
Andy Murray is a winner. Is that why some Brits don't like him?Publish date: 2009-06-28 09:19:20
New Parliament will look very different. The younger the betterPublish date: 2009-06-27 17:34:26
Two nice surprises, sad end to dayPublish date: 2009-06-26 09:16:33
Apology from the Spectator on Iraq boosts Henry Hodge fundPublish date: 2009-06-25 19:57:26
Thanks to Mr Harper on mental health, rebuttal of Mr Hague on IraqPublish date: 2009-06-24 23:47:54
Glad to find Eric Cantona in a quiet cinema ...Publish date: 2009-06-24 00:46:23
By Dave's friends shall we know him?Publish date: 2009-06-23 11:30:20
The Speaker has to balance tradition and change - but defend ParliamentPublish date: 2009-06-22 11:58:44
Less a blog than an apology for not having done onePublish date: 2009-06-21 20:07:43
The day Lions skipper Paul O'Connell took my trousers downPublish date: 2009-06-20 11:48:28
On the Iraq inquiry, Independent article wrongPublish date: 2009-06-19 20:28:24
Thank you to three readers, now please get involvedPublish date: 2009-06-19 09:13:35
A tribute to a lovely manPublish date: 2009-06-18 17:19:40
Bad times in Belfast, great day for Burnley, odd statement from Ed BallsPublish date: 2009-06-18 10:04:47
A plea for five-figure cyber-donationsPublish date: 2009-06-17 07:40:42
On two inquiriesPublish date: 2009-06-16 08:57:39
From India to Iran to Labour witPublish date: 2009-06-15 10:13:17
Memories of Princess DianaPublish date: 2009-06-14 09:54:55
A House Divided?Publish date: 2009-06-13 02:53:47
A humbling NHS experience, a media row and a good GB speechPublish date: 2009-06-12 10:48:46
Psychiatrists heading for relegation in 'disease prestige' league tablePublish date: 2009-06-11 10:25:35
The shrinks awaitPublish date: 2009-06-10 09:44:16
As Obama fights for healthcare, let's celebrate the record herePublish date: 2009-06-09 12:52:55
Anger at BNP seats must be turned into activismPublish date: 2009-06-08 14:11:10
Can today be as frenzied as Friday?Publish date: 2009-06-07 10:31:04
Take heart from a win in LambethPublish date: 2009-06-06 18:46:40
JP is right there was no proper campaign but Tories still weakPublish date: 2009-06-05 13:47:20
Do we care more about the NHS or moats?Publish date: 2009-06-04 00:21:23
Guardian of social justice or attention-seeker?Publish date: 2009-06-03 10:19:33
Who says Britain can't deliver the best?Publish date: 2009-06-02 08:08:38
Mainstream has a duty to vote against BNPPublish date: 2009-06-01 11:03:29
Let Diversity inspire a vote against the hate-filled BNPPublish date: 2009-05-31 12:24:20
White House whack at UK media well-timed but sure to be ignoredPublish date: 2009-05-30 13:41:00
Elvis has a plan to make MPs King againPublish date: 2009-05-29 12:09:44
At least there's a campaign on in ItalyPublish date: 2009-05-28 09:04:32
A blow to gay rights and a boost for Cameron's short-termismPublish date: 2009-05-27 11:27:41
It's my blog and I'll be a big kid if I want toPublish date: 2009-05-26 23:25:58
Highs feel better after so many lowsPublish date: 2009-05-26 10:13:12
Only one present countsPublish date: 2009-05-25 11:05:46
Contrast Cheney and BushPublish date: 2009-05-24 12:11:45
Sex (or at least the female form) obsessed BritainPublish date: 2009-05-23 20:49:57
Sport at both ends of the financial spectrumPublish date: 2009-05-23 09:57:23
Stronger together - whether Scotland or expensesPublish date: 2009-05-22 10:22:36
Back to Number 10, familiar faces, familiar argumentsPublish date: 2009-05-21 10:14:34
Speaking up for ParliamentPublish date: 2009-05-20 11:44:17
Peace in the Middle East - yes he canPublish date: 2009-05-19 09:37:35
Breaking news - one frenzy at a timePublish date: 2009-05-18 10:34:30
Getting a good look at Vince CablePublish date: 2009-05-17 09:36:55
How do you solve a problem like Silvio?Publish date: 2009-05-16 09:32:21
It was the internet wot won itPublish date: 2009-05-15 10:04:57
There now follows ... a good whack at CameronPublish date: 2009-05-14 17:21:28
They got their kit off - so you get your cash outPublish date: 2009-05-14 07:41:11
Expenses row must not obscure Tory intentions on minimum wagePublish date: 2009-05-13 16:12:08
We love you Burnley, we do ... what a nightPublish date: 2009-05-13 02:37:17
A tweet cannot express the wonders of TGVPublish date: 2009-05-12 08:48:31
It's Mind week - Get it off your Chest with me and Stephen FryPublish date: 2009-05-11 06:29:15
Hate the Mail, love ObamaPublish date: 2009-05-10 10:04:00
Burnley 1 Reading 0 - a biased reportPublish date: 2009-05-09 21:26:32
MPs expenses - time for party leaders to meet againPublish date: 2009-05-09 09:50:19
Should happiness replace prosperity as national goal?Publish date: 2009-05-08 08:43:23
Musings from a sleepless nightPublish date: 2009-05-07 07:33:49
Darren Fletcher - an injustice that has to be rightedPublish date: 2009-05-06 09:52:29
Maggie's legacy not as great as she thinksPublish date: 2009-05-05 08:33:02
Here's hoping Cardiff is metaphor for CameronPublish date: 2009-05-04 09:38:30
More Mr Benn and Co pleasePublish date: 2009-05-03 10:03:00
Going Fourth with JPPublish date: 2009-05-02 18:25:41
Journalism - print first, think laterPublish date: 2009-05-02 09:10:01
In praise of two poetsPublish date: 2009-05-01 10:26:36
JP hits the road againPublish date: 2009-04-29 18:52:11
My night with Eddie IzzardPublish date: 2009-04-29 10:53:25
Explaining the 50p top tax ratePublish date: 2009-04-28 09:22:53
George Best and Martin McGuinnessPublish date: 2009-04-27 09:02:35
Cameron confused over indepdendence and impartialityPublish date: 2009-04-26 12:20:56
Guide ro Marathon running part 2Publish date: 2009-04-25 11:01:34
Good signals on coal and the OlympicsPublish date: 2009-04-24 10:45:28
Tips for the London MarathonPublish date: 2009-04-23 17:29:27
Missed the Budget, saw why it matteredPublish date: 2009-04-22 23:09:31
Football good, politics bad. AllegedlyPublish date: 2009-04-22 00:00:24
The Great Wall gets greaterPublish date: 2009-04-21 09:55:22
Two sides to police storyPublish date: 2009-04-20 11:39:54
Budgets, Balls, billionaires and Susan BoylePublish date: 2009-04-19 12:31:45
Do muscles have memories?Publish date: 2009-04-18 09:44:44
Bring back standing at footballPublish date: 2009-04-17 14:50:22
When Facebook friends fall outPublish date: 2009-04-16 12:29:16
Guardian sightings and the email and bath plug agendaPublish date: 2009-04-15 11:32:16
The spin is all in the prismPublish date: 2009-04-14 09:22:41
A setback, not a crisisPublish date: 2009-04-13 12:55:19
The real lessons from Damian McBridePublish date: 2009-04-12 10:49:47
Will English always be the dominant language?Publish date: 2009-04-11 10:02:02
On the pipes and what makes a ScotPublish date: 2009-04-10 11:06:20
John Prescott lazy? NO WAYPublish date: 2009-04-09 09:11:31
David Frost is seventyPublish date: 2009-04-08 08:48:38
The Speaker, BBC2, tonight and tomorrow 8pmPublish date: 2009-04-07 14:25:31
Obama, colds and being woken by Korean missilesPublish date: 2009-04-06 11:59:24
When a call matters more than protocolPublish date: 2009-04-05 11:33:42
Green Cities Champions LeaguePublish date: 2009-04-04 10:19:53
Could Cameron have delivered the G20 deal?Publish date: 2009-04-03 10:11:59
Of Benn and BonoPublish date: 2009-04-02 08:21:16
Memo to Sarko - allez vite a LondresPublish date: 2009-04-01 08:46:17
Happy April Fool's DayPublish date: 2009-04-01 01:44:05
Eurostar, Le Monde and a thought for the G20 sherpasPublish date: 2009-03-31 09:17:22
Why Kevin Rudd made an impactPublish date: 2009-03-30 10:24:41
Pre-G20 hype matters less than post-G20 processPublish date: 2009-03-29 13:17:28
The Damned UnitedPublish date: 2009-03-28 10:37:04
A hobby horse, a plug and a bit of sportPublish date: 2009-03-27 10:22:23
Cloughie - he had a lot to be big-headed aboutPublish date: 2009-03-26 09:38:36
A sad sight of the old fearing the youngPublish date: 2009-03-25 17:03:07
Post-modern, post-structural, or bullshit?Publish date: 2009-03-25 08:18:02
Learning the right lessons from ObamaPublish date: 2009-03-24 08:53:15
Lazy Dave needs to keep an eye on lazy KenPublish date: 2009-03-23 11:16:14
Farewell favourite restaurant, hello hometownPublish date: 2009-03-22 08:18:09
Dave, Danny and have the Tories really changed?Publish date: 2009-03-21 08:55:13
Life beyond Dover ...Publish date: 2009-03-20 10:11:21
My friends in The New Statesman - Fergie, Fiona, Tony, Sarah, Kevin, 'Dacre,' and a great GB idea for the G20Publish date: 2009-03-18 10:38:22
Iraq, Iran, GB, Obama and diplomatic chessPublish date: 2009-03-17 10:07:13
The Age of StupidPublish date: 2009-03-16 08:27:13
Is all change good?Publish date: 2009-03-15 10:00:06
The pressure of being a post-modern sex godPublish date: 2009-03-14 10:00:55
Cameron still hasn't sealed the deal with businessPublish date: 2009-03-13 09:21:49
Stand up for social workersPublish date: 2009-03-12 08:31:17
Surely Malcolm Tucker could have told Armando Ianucci ... You can't spin a spinnerPublish date: 2009-03-11 10:58:25
Start of a new approach from Labour?Publish date: 2009-03-10 09:54:12
A peace process still strongPublish date: 2009-03-09 08:21:05
Day of destiny for the real footballer of the yearPublish date: 2009-03-08 09:21:06
Private advice to Peggy Mitchell - the leaked note in fullPublish date: 2009-03-07 08:17:21
Boris, the Tories and the tummy-tickling poodle pressPublish date: 2009-03-06 09:49:37
A day in the life of the self-obsessed TV reporterPublish date: 2009-03-05 07:55:47
GB - good speech, well deliveredPublish date: 2009-03-04 19:31:05
Notes on the environment, a role in EastEndersPublish date: 2009-03-04 10:58:56
She may be my 'wife' but it is time to rebut!Publish date: 2009-03-03 10:52:59
Some speeches matter more than othersPublish date: 2009-03-02 12:04:45
Mental health and the Carling Cup FinalPublish date: 2009-03-01 09:08:17
Inside the chocolate factoryPublish date: 2009-02-28 10:23:59
GB on the G20, JP on Jeremy KylePublish date: 2009-02-27 09:14:36
Charity and the credit crunch, please give generously!Publish date: 2009-02-26 08:55:12
Why oh why are the Tories not home and dry?Publish date: 2009-02-24 09:44:59
Me, Dermot and ten top songsPublish date: 2009-02-23 10:02:19
Names round-upPublish date: 2009-02-22 08:43:39
What's in a name?Publish date: 2009-02-21 09:58:14
Editing the New StatesmanPublish date: 2009-02-20 11:42:36
Salute Peter M’s proper use of the F wordPublish date: 2009-02-19 09:58:58
Labour's communications challenge for the NHSPublish date: 2009-02-18 10:34:39
In praise of KeighleyPublish date: 2009-02-17 14:33:57
A night at the EmiratesPublish date: 2009-02-17 00:06:51
When marriage is testedPublish date: 2009-02-16 13:36:35
Spare me the myths and the whiningPublish date: 2009-02-15 13:29:50
Dave Cameron - is that all there is?Publish date: 2009-02-14 11:11:55
Boris Johnson: F is for ...Publish date: 2009-02-13 07:55:10
The Cameron vacuumPublish date: 2009-02-12 14:48:33
Lincoln, Obama, Blair and the 24 hour media culturePublish date: 2009-02-11 10:28:47
Eighteen interviews later ...Publish date: 2009-02-10 19:24:45
Time to talk about Time to Change on NewsnightPublish date: 2009-02-09 22:47:49
So that’s what they mean by online community?Publish date: 2009-02-08 12:12:51
First blogPublish date: 2009-02-05 15:23:57
Salisbury
2010-02-09 13:54:14Did you honestly not expect the crack about your novel being another work of fiction after the dossiers? Of course you did - or if you didn't you've lost your touch.
In fact Sandi Toksvig told the story on the News Quiz that she'd already used the line introducing you once before at some event, so it can hardly have come as a surprise. Won't be the last time you hear it either. I am sorry if it hurts your feelings - but I've never noticed evidence of you having much concern for the feelings of the political enemies you've bulldozed your way across.
Colin Morley
2010-02-08 15:01:45Does the BBC or any "political media elite" really set the agenda for these discussions/debates? I get heartily sick of hearing the same allegations of bias from both the Labour Party and the Tories when they are in a corner.
I sensed your anger and frustration during the Marr interview and although as you know from my previous comments I am not at all on your side re Iraq, I did feel a brief moment of sympathy. I am prepared to believe that both Blair and you were sincere - just completely out of touch with reality. I've never really bought the "Liar" bit - after all what purpose would lying serve? Still wish it was more of a public enquiry, though!
Bridget Sime
2010-02-08 14:25:56I have never written on a blog site before (or even read one!) but I was so incensed by your treatment by Andrew Marr and the media generally that I could not let the day go by without expressing my sympathy to you. You do a great job. I totally understand your exasperation. Keep up the good work! Bridget
ken boyle
2010-02-08 12:54:27Hi,
Not sure if this is the optimal way of 'making contact' with Alistair, given my purpose.....although I presume these comments are seen by human eye, so perhaps you could forward my words if you feel they're of sufficient interest....
I'm not, and never have been, a labour voter but what I emphatically don't want out of this forthcoming election is that nice Mr Cameron, and all his hinterland. To that end I found myself playing 'Saatchi' on the Design-a-Dave poster site, but I was looking to come up with stuff
which might hurt, rather than merely amuse....
Provisional ideas included:
Trust me. We're really very big on redistribution.
and
The Conservatives. We'll change your lives.
These were both notionally envisaged as part of a 'poster campaign'....but I then realised that if you could attach something verbally to him - which perhaps even then found it's way into popular thinking - that that would be very much more powerful.....
I think I do now have something which could perhaps be useful. It's actually quite a well-known phrasing with a hint of gentle comedy to it. If attached to David Cameron, it would point to his complete inexperience of government and therefore unsuitability. On a more subtle, almost subliminal level, the phrase also alludes to the dangers Cameron would bring for traditional Labour voters.
I'll not offer it up randomly, here and now, because I think it's too good for that, but Alistair - or indeed some other Labour person - would be welcome to come back to me, if I've aroused any interest. I'm not SO stupid as to think that I've hit upon a 'Labour isn't working' moment, but I do think the phrase would be worth hearing in a 'planning environment'.
hope to hear back
yours
KB
(phone no available, if preferred)
Paul Martin
2010-02-08 12:34:28Alasdair Campbell should support the introduction of a legal caution for vulnerable mental health patients who place themselves in extraordinary jeopardy by simply communicating with NHS staff. At the very least, people should be aware that the NHS transfers their data to Home Office registers and watchlists so that they can make an informed choice on the risks to their life chances.
John Turner (HDYDP.com)
2010-02-08 12:27:29Alastair,
I hope you know your Aristotle and your Julius Caesar.
Benevolence (the opposite of anger!) wins arguments, as well as the three appeals (reason, your character, and the needs of the voters - aka logos, ethos and pathos)
All of which you and GB need to continue to work on with THE TRUTH under-pinning all you have to say.
The set-piece oratory in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is well worth a read with the above in mind.
"What's The Motive?" is the question you and we should be asking each other and ourselves.
Regards
John (Non-Politically-Aligned!)
Charlie
2010-02-08 11:51:02I entirely concur with Leo's comment below.
Michael Sweeney
2010-02-08 11:20:43Well said. For what it's worth, I supported the Iraq intervention and believed it to be a noble cause - by both Bush and Blair. Saddam's wicked brutality and slipperiness is almost always overlooked by the war's critics. Islamist terrorists are much more effective at killing their co-religionists than the West has been. I wish you were as sensible and even handed in your treatment of the Tories and Labour's record though - I happen to believe it would do Labour's cause much good at the present time.
Mark Wright
2010-02-08 03:52:22I did find it somewhat amusing that considering all the important things that are going on in the world the two big stories of the day were 'Gordon Brown and Alastair Campbell Have Feelings'!
They'll next be reporting that Tony Blair likes small puppies and that his top lip quivers when he watches 'It's A Wonderful Life'!
Doug Gray
2010-02-08 03:07:15I would have liked you to make the point that how many people died is not anything to do with whether you lied or not, and then ask if you are being blamed for Al Qaeda suicide bombings? Then say it's only the families of the dead that are hurt when this line that they were lied to is repeatedly made by the media.
Say that next time.
Trevor Malcolm Portsmouth Hampshire
2010-02-08 01:26:19Another toweringly masterful performance, sir. This time opposite Andrew Marr. Your “emotional moment” – some four minutes and 12 seconds into the coverage, I became alarmed at the changes in your breathing patterns, hand clenching and physiology - I feared an almighty, but richly-deserved, "monstering" would land on the smug little Marr's head
Remains a mystery how you held it all back so elegantly, especially when such an outburst (the reaction I suspect Marr was itching to unleash in you) would've been thoroughly justified
Extraordinary levels of pressure, lately. The Inquiry, in particular. Worth taking time out to reflect that, regardless of all else, it's family first - your identity domains, as Loving Partner and Responsible Father - and second, your own health, physical and non-physical. Nothing else can ever matter as much
For example, on a "Needs Fulfilled" list, just imagine discovering that supporting the Labour Party to election victory 2010, Burnley FC, fundraising - charitable and political party - activist interest and lived experience in mental healthcare, Daily Mail editor Dacre-bashing, bike-riding, bagpipe-playing, and now Maya Lowe, fictional filmstar in your freshly-published novel, all these stacked upon higher shelves than your health and family. That would be alarming
And then, another damn inquiry, endless press coverage.Yet more tv interviews, never-ending
Yet, I guess there must come a time when, however much stuff out there needs publicising or debunking, you need to reflect on the value of “private and self-serving Me-time” away from camera flashlights and tabloid headlines, time spent with your partner Fiona and your family, just as much. And maybe even more so
Now would be an ideal start-time
TM ------
-------------
Robert Jackson
2010-02-08 00:57:34The political right have been Machiavellian provoking despair and anger in voters minds by pointing to birthrights and their theft or spoilage or wastage by Labour.
By batting on making bogeymen of Tony Blair and you, Alastair, they set a train of thought running for erstwhile Labour people:
"1997 - Labour majority vast
2001 - Labour majority vast
2003 - Bush and Blair get pally.
2005 - Labour majority slashed to 60+
2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 - if Blair hadn't joined up with Bush we'd have had a vast Labour majority in 2005 and be looking at an easy Labour win in 2009 and five years of Labour government to 2014 and prospects of a fifth term."
"As it is the Tories are resurgent and we are unpopular and we're gonna lose the 2010 election all because of Blair siding with Bush."
And so it goes on with all the ifs and recalculated buts softening up the Left and the Middle.
But thinking back, at the close of poll on 1st May 1997 the BBC Exit polls came up with a projected majority of 59 - result ecstasy.
2005 we get a majority over 60 - result gloom.
"We wuz robbed by Blair and Campbell and Bush."
And so it goes on - the same tactic as the Tory promise on inheritance tax cuts for the wealthy few, just turned around and aimed squarely where it hurts most - in our emotions.
Katie
2010-02-08 00:09:48I feel for you and for Gordon Brown, obviously in his case, reluctantly in yours because I am a human being however much I wish straightforward questions could just be answred. I would not want to cricise GB in any aspect regarding the tragedy he went through and lives with. The only thing I would say because it has to be said is that when David Cameron spoke of his grief for his son, Gordon Brown said he would never do that in public and DC was merely using his children. I hate all the hypocrisy in politics.
Sven
2010-02-07 23:24:57Just a line to say it appears your mates are with you, you are not on your own. Good luck mate, dont let the bastards grind you down.
Gusemcontra
2010-02-07 23:21:15Do you only publish sympathetic comments? Frankly, I didn't buy the panic attack. What it seemed to be was a well spun 'human' side to the support for the war. That's the problem, Alastair: If you spin all your life, people stop believing anything you do/say.
Peter
2010-02-07 22:53:51Enough is enough; I for one am tired of the determination of the small minded journalists, politicians and gullable public to uncover a scandal that just doesn't exist. I may not always have agreed with TB or AC, but I truly believe a decision was made based on the only intelligence available at the time and, as TB has said, it was judgement he had to make at the time. All those invilved will have to live with that decision - right or wrong - for the rest of their lives, so let's not allow anyone to be villified over an exceptionally difficult decision that none of us would want to make ourselves.
I would say, however, that a little humility by either AC or TB regarding the loss of life would go a long way. That aside, please be assured that I am one of many that feel it is now time to move on. Good luck.
Jersey Bean
2010-02-07 22:01:49Well done Alastair - as a "Jersey Bean" and with no aparent view on politics from our little rock, I am beginning to despise the constant questioning as to the war. As you say in your blog, you have been cleared three times at hearings, you and TB know the truth - yes people died in the War but with my objective head these men and women who signed up to the Forces always have an iota of doubt that they may have to go to war - it is time to let it go to rest... I felt for you this morning - not because of the politics - but because of the pressure that not only for you but your family are going through and that as someone earlier put on your blog, Marr really needed to be told to "Back off" in no uncertain way. Keep your chin up - at least Burnley won!!!
Lindsay
2010-02-07 21:04:45Alastair,
Whilst I have many reservations about Tony Blair, the War and so on, it was refreshing to see a man in the public eye getting 'emotional' on TV. I also welcome your previous honest, very public examination of the personal difficulties you have faced over the years.
Too few men are able to openly admit to having to deal with these issues and you have been courageous and brave in being open about the difficulties you and others face.
If only more politicians, and I work with many, were able to admit to having feelings.
Regards from Todmorden
Lindsay
Ela
2010-02-07 20:40:48Once again it seems to me that so many people do not want to accept that their opponents are anything other than evil. After all it makes life so much easier when you believe that the person on the other side of the barricade is -as you put it - devoid of humanity. I was opposed to the Iraq war and never seen the intervention as a way of stabilising the region. I never trusted the Bush administration and Tony Blair's missionary streak seemed a bit of a worry. The more I look at it from the prespective I can see how he reached the conclusion that he did and I accept it was in good faith. I remain very sceptical about this war but I hope the years to come will prove me wrong. What I cannot accept though is the constant liar...criminal mantra. This sort of vilification does not serve any purpose. It proves nothing. It belittles those who opposed the war. About the Marr interview - I'd like to say well-done. If somebody had told me a few months ago that I would post a favourable comment (which I've done a few times now) I would have laughed. Life is full of surprises.
Bar Bar of Oz
2010-02-07 20:22:15The Iraq Inquiry is the Princess Diana inquest with Andrew Marr et al behaving like Mohammed Fayed. The Fayed brigade is now vilifying and intimidating the panel members because the evidence is not going their way. It is my belief that after TB's second round of evidence, followed by Gordon's sell out appearance, the public will be saying enough is enough. It will be the perfect opportunity for Gordon to demonstrate his prime ministerial authority by defending the integrity of the Blair govt, its Attorney-General, civil servants, intelligence services and military and to insist on an end to the witch-hunt.
AG
2010-02-07 20:17:32Give us your type of honesty any day - well done!
adm
2010-02-07 19:57:55The media still keep asking the questions because people are still dieing in iraq directly as a result of a decision made in opposition to the will of the a vast number of people in this country. Sorry if that gets in the way of you flogging your novel.
Higgidoni
2010-02-07 19:33:03It all seems that although the questions on Andrew Marr may have appeared "tough" and prompted emotion, that through your own blog you are still trying to state the BBC have it "in" for you and TB.
Being public figures it is the judgement of the public that will be your enduring legacy. Although I agreed with going to War, and believe TB is honourable in his decision. The fact I am angry about is the Government failed to support funding for equipment and that when we need to make important decisions again is the public naturally think Government "lies" or misleads them. Would the public stomach a war? Or the appeasement in the 30's prevail - you should focus on how you've changed public opinion in Government and the Office of Prime Minister. To my opinion, the trust has been damaged greatly by the actions of lead up to 2003 invasion.
rhian
2010-02-07 19:26:22I am so weary of the BBC pushing the TB evil/ NO WMD argument down my throat, that I mentally switch off now: its like white noise or lift music..
I'm afraid its a bit like the endless global warming preaching that is designed to make mr and mrs ordinary feel guilty for being alive, let alone putting the heating on..
No wonder there is a back-lash..
All credit to you for standing your ground and stating that Marr had already decided what he wanted to hear...
If more people openly criticised the media agenda in a Live debate, we might even get some real reporting instead of Big Brother BBC telling the little people what we're supposed to think & who we're suppposed to hate!
Helen
2010-02-07 19:22:36When will the media circus on Iraq end? Marr lost all my respect today. Cannot wait to read your book!
leo
2010-02-07 18:48:05You looked like you were having an old-fashioned panic attack - not pleasant. I object to this line of argument that Blair took a decision because that's what you do when you lead as it implies that decision was taken late on after much thought, due diligence and exploration of all other options. But what Chilcot evidence seems to show is that if there was a decision Blair took it well before the war and then drove the process. He was not sitting there like Solomon dispensing wisdom he was in there making it happen. I don't have an agenda, that's what the evidence seems to show - including yours and Blair's himself. And that's why people are so angry. It is of immense credit to this country that amidst all that can make you cynical this enquiry is bringing events to light that in many other countries would stay hidden.
Quietzapple
2010-02-07 18:35:15Oh, I'd canvas with Tony Blair and Alastair Campbell. I reckon they'd buy the beers . . .
Quietzapple
2010-02-07 18:33:40I despair of the nous of any who find tears a surprising response to intense repeated persecutory questioning on the road to the Iraq war or probing on the loss of a child.
I believe Saddam's claim that he would have resumed his WMD programmes. In line with what experts like Dr David Kelly, who was honoured for helping find some of them, said. In line with his history of using them.
Perhaps he would have confined himself to Israel and Iraq, but . . .
Tez
2010-02-07 18:32:12This is my first time of reading Alistair's blog & I must say how refreshing it is to compare my views with like minded people.
I think Alistair is right about the BBC trying to settle old scores and the media is setting its own agenda rather than reporting actual news.
I would have liked to see Alistair give Big Ears AM a left jab as JP did to the egg thrower!
JOEB
2010-02-07 18:30:37The 3 Labour mps with their snouts in the trough,Remember the claim in 1997 Nulabor will be whiter than white
Patrick James
2010-02-07 18:29:14I don't have a TV so I haven't watched any of these programs.
Although somewhat irrelevant to politics I think that it will be good to see a bit more of Gordon Brown "the man" as opposed to Gordon Brown "the politician". TV viewers have been watching David Cameron "the man" for years but have never seen David Cameron "the politician" :)
I think a biographic video of Gordon Brown would be very good. I remember the one that John Major did when he went to Brixton. I thought that was rather a good idea myself and I'd like to see Gordon Brown going to the Scottish town where he grew up.
I believe a lot of Gordon Brown's personal style relates to his upbringing. I grew up in Northern Ireland which is very like Scotland in many ways and so I think I have some understanding of why GB is the way he is.
UN bureaucrat
2010-02-07 18:25:42Mr Campbell
The Lancet survey, which is what Marr was quoting (as gospel) was funded by anti-war billionaire George Soros and is not a recognised UN figure. It is wildly - very wildly - exaggerated. It posits around 600,000 fatalities out of 650,000 excess deaths.
The most accurate and recent figure is around 100,000 from the invasion in 2003 up to December 2009, by the Iraq Body Count.
I would suggest Mr Marr was a victim of a wildcard researcher with an anti-war agenda. He has let himself go as a journalist.
I have watched your interview over here in NYC. Respect to you.
geoff
2010-02-07 18:06:10I never believed Blair could really have mislead the country on WMDs. That was until the Marr interview this morning.
Why wasn't the answer to his question: "when the inquiry looks at the evidence, they will see there is clear evidence of WMDs, hence Blair did not mislead"? Surely a simple answer. That's all it had to be.
To win the election, Labour needs now to sever all ties with Blair, and get Clair Short back in a senior position. Make her PM if it means the Tories don't make it.
olli issakainen
2010-02-07 17:59:11May I suggest a sort of "closure" to the Iraq war thing, so that people involved would be able to move on in their lives.
First, the Iraq question had to be settled in 2003. Sanctions were endangering the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. This fact has been curiously overlooked in media. It has been even denied that humanitarian problem in Iraq was a sufficient reason to intervene.
So something had to be done, and quickly. Had the sanctions been lifted, Saddam would have, in all probability, started his WMD programmes again.
Robin Cook´s "correct policy" of giving Hans Blix the time to complete Iraq´s verified disarmament would not have solved the WMD problem in the long run, neither. Saddam could have started his programmes again in the future.
After 9/11 USA had to something to prevent future attacks. Even if there was a one per cent possibility of Saddam having WMD and giving them to terrorists, risk could not be taken. And as even a Saddam general believed that he possessed them, there clearly was a case.
So something had to done, and the right path was chosen. The problem is that this course of action became mixed with anti-Americanism. Were there a million people marching on the streets of London when Saddam invaded Iran? No.
Human beings never have enough time or intelligence to make perfect decisions. Iraq was a closed society, and it was very difficult to get truthful information from it. And, of course, it must be admitted that tactical mistakes have been in the aftermath.
Even though that I think that right thing was done in Iraq, I do not think that asking whether something is right or wrong in international politics is fruitful. Big and powerful look usually after their national interest and smaller countries suffer.
Right question is whether a mistake was made or not. As I guess most of us know what Oscar Wilde said about moral outrage, I do not repeat it here.
Charlie
2010-02-07 17:35:43It would appear that there are some people whose appeal decreases with each TV appearance: ie Yourself, GB, PM.
The reverse seems to be true of David Cameron.
It will be very interesting to see whether this phenomenon remains true as the General Election pace hots up over the next few weeks.
Jane
2010-02-07 17:20:32I shall not watch the Piers Morgan interview - I am not a fan of the man and, I am not interested in a PM discussing personal issues. I realise this bearing of the soul is expected by many and no doubt the programme will attract viewers. We all know that GB is not comfortable in discussing such issues - this is OK by me.
I tape the Andrew Marr and Adam Boulton programmes and then watch any guests as I so wish. Firstly, I once was a great admirer of Mr Marr when he was a paper journalist. I regret that his interview skills on television leave me cold as I want to hear what the guests have to say. Too often it is apparent that those being interviewed do not have this opportunity. The interview this morning followed the usual pattern. It is most off putting listening to a hyperactive journalist which is why I cannot watch the programme live. Some of the otherprogrammes he fronts are worthy subjects but again I cannot watch a journalist flapping their hands and overtalking. Ofall things to happen today, my taping of Adam Boulton ended just after you appeared! What a nuisance. I would say that I am deighted you did not lose your rag with Mr Marr - he is not worth the blood pressure soaring. Secondly, you looked comfortable on Sky. I tuned in to hear what you had to say about your new book having read some reviews. A bit silly of me expecting to have a book review....I have ordered a copy anyway...
Your analysis of journalism is right. I am watching the Chilcott enquiry, reading transcripts and the evidence made available. I then listen and read the media's account. Listening is interesting - not just the words used but the intonation and emphasis on partial testimony. Some of the press reports are disgraceful. Not everyone has the time to read the Enquiry Site or listen to testimony. They look to newspapers for information providing factual accounts and analysis based on these accounts. Insteadwe are getting partial reporting to substantiate journalists bias. It is quite shocking.
I respect those who opposed the Iraq War. I supported the war but feel that those of us who did are ignored as if our views are subservient to those who are making the headlines. As the Fox News Channel say - "balanced and fair reporting" hm hm.....
Louise Ward
2010-02-07 16:47:00Alastair, the insight and the frustration were palpable.......well done you.....
Gary Hills
2010-02-07 16:42:40I fully endorse your view that people are not looking for the truth over Iraq. We have a shameful media and press backed up by those who see conspiracies where there are none.
Mr Marr showed his own ignorance on the issues today and his own view. Despite what is claimed he like so many journalists hate the notion that Blair did what he thought was right.
It does not fit into the lies and distortion they have created around the war. Instead a person like Andrew Gilligan gets away with real deception and creates myths over fact. Yet that is overlooked because he spins a negative instead of a fact.
Mr Blair is a decent man who should not be treated like dirt by our media and press. It is they who look foolish in how they behave and have shown the depths of how low they will sink to avoid saying they were wrong.
Well done for standing by your view and for defending Mr Blair. Its important history knows the reality and not the faux truth some seek to create.
Malcolm Kelly
2010-02-07 16:36:12Gordon is clearly damned if he does damned if he doesn;t, but if he is natural and honest that will come through to his advntage. People have a feeling about Cameron that he is not quite ashe presents hinself
Brian
2010-02-07 16:35:15>And they cannot even merely accept that a 'wrong' decision was taken
Do you think the "wrong" decision was taken?
Hugh Margolis
2010-02-07 16:34:36The 600000 body count figure quoted by Marr came from the Lancet analysis which has beeen discredited by every body with any real locus on this. The Red Cross has also stated that the Iraq body count - a large number but a fraction of the claim made by Marr - is the likeliest to be the most accurate. I totally agree that these people just pursue their own agenda
Dario Preston
2010-02-07 16:31:31saw both programmes. Marr - glib is the word. Boulton was positvely grumpy all programme but lightened up when you came on and you had a proper chat I thought. No harm in showing a bit of emotion either. V humsn, and your point about their agenda spot on
Jane A
2010-02-07 16:27:23At times like these, I wonder how you remain as unexasperated as you do.
You have the courage of your convictions, and you remain constant in articulating them, even under immense provocation. You did well.
Nicholas Derbyshire
2010-02-07 16:15:43" ... the reactions on social networking sites mainly friendly and supportive ... "
We obviously visit different social networking sites! If you had any love for the great Labour party (which I've supported faithfully ever since I reached voting age) you'd keep out of the way until the election is over. You bring a dark cloud over everything the party tries to do. Compare the way Alan Johnson handles the media: you could learn a hell of a lot from analysing him.
But, then again, old dogs, new tricks.
Post a comment