www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Advertise on this site

YouGov shows an 8 point swing to the Conservatives in London

The Evening Standard are reporting a new YouGov poll in London for ITV. The topline figures are CON 40%, LAB 31%, LDEM 18%.

This represents a hefty 8 point swing in the capital, significantly more than the figures YouGov have been showing nationally (the poll was conducted between the 19th and 21st, so at the same time as the 7 point national lead; a five point national swing compared to an eight point London swing).

So, good news for the Conservatives here, but of course a given the lower national swing a disproportionately large swing here must be being cancelled out by a poor performance somewhere else.

On budget bounces…and budget slumps

With the budget tomorrow, I thought I’d update this chart from a year ago. It shows the two YouGov polls preceding each of the last eight budgets, and the two YouGov polls that followed each one, giving us a sign of whether the budget gave the government a boost or not.

As you can see, budgets have generally not given the government much of a boost – the most positive one was 2005, which took Labour from three points behind to two points ahead. I am sure is it no coincidence that it was a pre-election budget!
As someone has pointed out, it was actually 2006, so not a pre-election budget – my earlier cynicism was unwarrented. The actual 2005 budget didn’t have much of an effect at all.

The two most recent budgets have been disasterous in terms of Labour’s position in the polls. In both cases Alistair Darling was forced to deliver news about just how bad the economic situation was, and both turned a Labour deficit of around about 6 points into a Conservative lead in the mid teens. Clearly a similar result from tomorrow’s budget would be disasterous for Labour, but with the country out of recession a more positive message from Darling may be able to avoid a similar result to 2008 and 2009.

YouGov’s lead goes back to 4

Today’s YouGov poll has topline figures of CON 36%(-2), LAB 32%(+1), LDEM 20%(+1). The Tory lead is back down to four points (in fact the figures are the same as YouGov were showing on Wednesday and Thursday last week) and it looks very likely that the 7 point lead YouGov recorded over the weekend was just a result of sample error. Clearly there is no sign of the current lobbying row having damaged Labour yet.

This poll actually makes rather more sense to me than the YouGov and ICM polls that were showing the same figures over the weekend. For the last month or so ICM have tended to show Conservative leads a couple of points higher than YouGov’s, so while nothing to write home about (after all, all polls are subject to margin of error) it was rather unusual to find ICM showing a 6 point when YouGov were on 7. With ICM on six points, I’d expect to find YouGov on four.

While it’s normally impossible to precisely identify the reasons for differences between polls (there are so many different variables: the mode, the sampling, the wording, the weighting, etc) one obvious explanation is likelihood to vote – ICM weight people by how likely they are to vote, YouGov do not.

Opinium Express poll – 37/30/15

There is a new Opinium poll in the Daily Express with topline figures of CON 37%(-2), LAB 30%(+2), LDEM 15%(-1). “Others” remain at a very high 18%.

Looking at the back data of Opinium, they have some rather contrarian results – last autumn their polls would have been showing the lowest Conservative leads, in the last few weeks they have been showing some of the larger Conservatives leads. They do not use any political weighting on their polls, and I suspect this contributes to a higher level of volatility.

Later on tonight we should have our usual YouGov poll in the Sun.

Populus poll DOESN’T show a 7 point Tory lead – UPDATED

UPDATE: It seems that it is not a co-incidence that these “Populus” figures for the 10th-11th March match the ICM poll conducted at the same time. I’ve checked with Andrew Cooper and they are one and the same poll. As regular readers will know, Populus sometimes use ICM’s call centre for their fieldwork. The income questions for Resolution went on the same poll as the ICM voting intention questions, so the voting intention figures are actually from ICM.

Populus did not carry out a national voting intention poll for the Times this month, instead conducting a survey of marginal seats. However, it turns out they have conducted a voting intention poll for the Resolution Foundation, a think tank working on policies for low earners.

It was conducted between March 10th and 11th, so it is a week old now, but the topline figures with changes from Populus’s February poll are CON 38%(-2), LAB 31%(+1), LDEM 21%(+1). This gives the Conservatives a 7 point lead, much in line ICM’s polling at the time.

As one might expect given their field of interest, Resolution have broken down voting intention by income, with not unsurprising results. Conservative support is highest amongst the better paid, lowest amongst the least well paid. Labour support is the opposite. Overall it meant that the Conservatives had a nine point lead amongst those earning more than £27,144, but Labour had a 6 point lead amongst those earning less than £11,596 (strangly enough the Lib Dems did best amongst those who refused to answer the income question, but I expect this is just random chance, the previous month the Conservatives had done best amongst refusniks).

More from the YouGov/Sunday Times poll

The full tables for the YouGov/Sunday Times poll are on their website here.

On the regular trackers Gordon Brown’s job approval rating is down since a fortnight ago (a net rating of -28, from -24) and Cameron up to +10 from +4. With the Lib Dems still enjoying higher ratings than YouGov were showing before their spring conference, Nick Clegg’s approval rating is at +20 from +12 a fortnight ago, the second highest YouGov have ever given him.

YouGov asked a series of questions on trade unions and Unite. 49% of people thought that Unite had a great deal or a fair amount of influence over the government. 17% though it was ever thus – that Labour had always been controlled by the unions, 28% thought Labour had distanced itself, but control was now shifting back. 32% thought that Labour used to be controlled by the unions but no longer was (including a majority of Labour supporters). More generally, 22% of people think trade unions are too powerful in Britain today, 19% thinki they are not powerful enough with 45% thinking they have about the right level of power.

Asked specifically about the BA strike, 35% of respondents thought the government should have condemned the strike more strongly, 18% thought the government got their criticism about right (a sum of 53% supporting the government criticising the strike). 30% said the government should not have taken sides, with 4% saying the government should have supported the strike.

Hardly anyone says the strike would actually change their vote at the election (and most of those that do can be dismissed – the 4% who say it makes them less likely to vote Labour are mostly Conservative voters anyway, while most of the 1% who say it makes them more likely to vote Labour are already Labour voters). However, while it may not be a direct consideration, it could still have an indirect effect in terms of the government’s response and the effect upon their party image.

Moving on, YouGov also asked about the budget. Only 25% of people said they expected Alistair Darling to tell to truth about Labour’s plans for the economy in the budget, with 64% saying he would not. Taken alone that sounds like a very negative finding for the government… but when asked the same question about George Osborne the figures are much the same, 24% expect him to tell the truth, 62% do not.

Finally there were questions on Methedrone (63% think it should be banned), and Gordon Brown’s comments on defence spending at the Chilcot Inquiry (64% agree with the criticism that he underfunded defence).