www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Dear John

EMAILPRINTScreen Gems (Sony)

Dear John reviews
43
6.9 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 32 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 10 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Drama  |  Romance  |  War

Written by: Jamie Linden

Directed by: Lasse Hallstrom

Release Date:
Theatrical: February 5, 2010

Running Time: 108 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for some sensuality and violence

Starring Channing Tatum, Amanda Seyfried, Henry Thomas, Richard Jenkins, and Keith Robinson

Directed by Lasse Hallström and based on the novel by best-selling author Nicholas Sparks, DEAR JOHN tells the story of John Tyree, a young soldier home on leave, and Savannah Curtis, the idealistic college student he falls in love with during her spring vacation. Over the next seven tumultuous years, the couple is separated by John's increasingly dangerous deployments. While meeting only sporadically, they stay in touch by sending a continuous stream of love letters overseas—correspondence that eventually triggers fateful consequences. (Sony Pictures)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

70

The New York Times A.O. Scott

Dear John carefully distills selected elements of human experience and reduces them to a sweet and digestible syrup. It may not be strong medicine, but it delivers an effective, pleasing dose of pure sentiment and vicarious heartache.

Read Full Review >
70

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

I'm fully prepared to hear people write off Dear John as corny, sappy, a movie for chicks. But I'd counter that Hallström's old-fashioned idealism about art and emotion is the more important quality shining through Dear John.

Read Full Review >
63

Miami Herald Connie Ogle

There's an audience for old-fashioned romance, and Dear John will please most of it.

Read Full Review >
63

St. Louis Post-Dispatch Calvin Wilson

Fulfills its mission, which is to be a crowd-pleasing tearjerker.

Read Full Review >
60

Village Voice Staff (Not credited)

The biggest surprise here is Tatum, whose butch reticence has never been put to better use: His saddest farewell isn’t to his lady, but to a man even more uncommunicative than he is.

Read Full Review >
58

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

Ironically, they make the bond between John and Savannah look so natural that the ''dear John'' turn in their relationship makes even less sense than it does in the book.

Read Full Review >
58

The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias

Hallström's approach to the material is tasteful and restrained to a fault.

Read Full Review >
50

Boston Globe Janice Page

Unfortunately for Tatum and Seyfried, Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams did a far more convincing version of this same basic dance in “The Notebook.’’

Read Full Review >
50

USA Today Claudia Puig

You're more likely to roll your eyes than swoon over this slow-moving and far-fetched love story.

Read Full Review >
50

Los Angeles Times Betsy Sharkey

There's no real depth or texture to the characters of any sort, sentimental or otherwise, and I say that as someone who can be brought to tears by a Hallmark commercial.

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Chronicle Amy Biancolli

You promised only a slim plot, tidy morals and lovers with quaking loins. It was fun while it lasted.

Read Full Review >
50

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

The film has two curious subplots and supporting performances that feel tacked on rather than organically part of it.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Dear John exists only to coddle the sentiments of undemanding dreamers, and plunge us into a world where the only evil is the interruption of the good.

Read Full Review >
50

The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

The film, while heartfelt and directed by multiple-Oscar nominee Lasse Hallstrom, is dramatically stillborn.

Read Full Review >
50

Variety Brian Lowry

Ultimately, the story feels as if it's killing time before throwing the next hurdle at the couple.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman

If you're just hoping for a little easy escapism, bring your tissues and leave your high standards at home.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips

I truly wish Dear John were a better, less shamelessly manipulative movie, but a couple of the actors got me through it alive. One is Amanda Seyfried.

Read Full Review >
50

Washington Post Michael O'Sullivan

Dear Nicholas Sparks, There's no easy way to say this. But with Dear John, the latest of the five films made so far from your sentimental, best-selling novels, I think our relationship is in trouble.

Read Full Review >
50

New Orleans Times-Picayune Mike Scott

The ending of Dear John feels manufactured and patently false. Seyfried tries to sell it, but you can tell that she's having a hard time believing the words coming out of her mouth.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer

Halfway through the movie, I decided a better title for this weepie contraption would be “The Hurt Letter.”

Read Full Review >
50

ReelViews James Berardinelli

The appeal is there for those who crave formulaic romantic drama, but there's little of interest for a wider audience.

Read Full Review >
40

Time Mary Pols

This isn't a love story, it's a misery story that drags on, not to a dramatic conclusion but a tepid moment.

Read Full Review >
40

Arizona Republic Bill Goodykoontz

Awash in mawkish sentimentality, Dear John still will move you deeply - if you're a 12-year-old girl.

Read Full Review >
40

Chicago Reader J.R. Jones

This terminally sappy romance delivers heartache, sacrifice, a make-out scene in the pouring rain, and not one but two autistic characters.

Read Full Review >
40

Slate Dana Stevens

It's the cinematic equivalent of a plastic-covered couch under a "Bless This House" sampler. And that's not a bad thing, for audiences who have a high threshold for sentiment and a low one for dramatic conflict.

Read Full Review >
40

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

What happens when a genuinely dear John gets a Dear John? For the answer, just meander--no need for running or walking--to your local multiplex. That's where Dear John, based on the Nicholas Sparks novel of the same name, will be meandering on its downward path from sweetly tender to terminally turgid.

Read Full Review >
40

Boxoffice Magazine John P. McCarthy

As flat as the Carolina coastal region in which it’s set, Dear John features two gorgeous young actors playing denuded characters in search of more narrative garb.

Read Full Review >
38

Orlando Sentinel Roger Moore

Hallstrom and his low-heat stars can’t find the pulse of this corpse.

Read Full Review >
30

Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones

He is meant to be brooding, I think, but Tatum’s vague features read more “meathead” than anguished young lover. He has to carry the film, but he’s the least interesting thing going on here.

Read Full Review >
25

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

As for the ladies who think any kind of chick flick is preferable to football, be careful what you wish for.

Read Full Review >
25

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

Sappy and predictable.

Read Full Review >
25

New York Post Lou Lumenick

Dear John is the sort of movie that gives tearjerkers a bad name.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 6.9 (out of 10) based on 10 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

[Anonymous] gave it a9:
The best love story I have seen in years! Channing's acting is outstanding. The audience is captivated by his ability to make them see his heart through his eyes! love it.

Alessandra S gave it an8:
I had been looking forward to seeing this movie for weeks (as someone who is in love with 'the notebook' and touching love stories). I will tell you that it is a tear-jerker. I heard many sobs coming from the audience (ok, maybe many of them were mine). The adapted screenplay attempted to include different storylines in the film, as not to make it your stereotypical love story. They were semi-successful at this. The acting is quite good, especially Channing Tatum who plays a young soldier with many repressed feelings. A couple of scenes I felt Amanda Seyfried's acting was not completely believable but still very good. What can i say, it touched a place deep in my heart, especially the secondary story of John's (Tatum) introverted, lonely father. Enjoy!!

Tony S. gave it a7:
Stephanie Zacharek says it all: "I'm fully prepared to hear people write off "Dear John" as corny, sappy, a movie for chicks. But I'd counter that Hallström's old-fashioned idealism about art and emotion is the more important quality shining through "Dear John." Maybe it's corny only if you've managed to reach adulthood without ever having to say goodbye."

Megan W. gave it a10:
Heart-breaking story of how long can't always conquer all.

Chad S. gave it a6:
In the best tradition of wartime romances, the woman on the homefront can't commit to celibacy, so she writes a Dear John letter calling it quits with her soldier boy overseas. It's a plot point, in which the moviegoer's sympathy is stacked in the man's favor. Like with any war film, "Dear John" dramatizes the combat soldier's plight to stay alive. He's fighting for you and me, and her; he's a hero, and deserves to be treated like one. Obviously, his is the greater sacrifice, since no woman ever died from lack of sex. In such love triangle situations, nobody roots for the other guy(the guy who lets other guys fight in his place), no matter how lonely the woman claims to be. She's a slut, pure and simple, because we identify with the combat soldier. When John Tyree(Channing Tatum) gets hit by enemy fire, the moviegoer's hates Savannah(Amanda Seyfried) even more; her betrayal is amplified by the soldier's fleeting relationship with the physical world. To make matters worse, John suspects(and we do, too) that Amanda's new lover is his rival from the beach. "Dear John", however, treats its female character fairly, since John's injury turns out not to be a life-threatening one. There's no cause for Amanda to well-up with guilty tears. And surprise, surprise, John's replacement is Tim(Henry Thomas), a man with terminal cancer, defusing the moviegoer's inclination to hate Amanda somewhat for her disloyalty. In fact, "Dear John" quite suddenly puts John in a bad light, because it's in his best interest if Tim died, and get Amanda back. "Dear John" is subversive in this sense: a reunion between John and Amanda constitutes an unhappy ending, unless the moviegoer is heartless enough to root for a cancer patient to perish. (Exactly what are John's motivations for his seemingly magnanimous act of generosity toward Tim's affliction?)

Brittany H. gave it a3:
Terrible... what a disappointing and inaccurate film... why did they bother to keep the title Dear John as this story is clearly not Spark's work.