Michael Gove
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Is driving inherently right wing? The evidence, initially, appears overwhelming. Many years ago, in Reithian times, the BBC used to produce a motoring show of quite narcoleptic dullness. The original Top Gear was a programme tailored for those who found One Man and his Dog too exciting.
A dreary survey of crankshaft performance and winter roadholding for every new vehicle on the market made for a show every bit as gripping as radial and crossply tyres on the same axle.
But, over the years, something amazing happened. Not only did Top Gear become addictive viewing, it did so by doing something I don’t think any BBC programme (apart from possibly The Moral Maze) has ever done: by moving to the Right.
Thanks to Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond, the programme has become a celebration of individual freedom, capitalist excess and private-sector innovation. It is also laced with laddish distrust of political correctness, nannying and Ken Livingstone-style finger-wagging. Some viewers might find its sensibility just a bit too juvenile, even public-schoolish, with the presenters mobbing each other up and addressing each other by their surnames. But I find it totally absorbing.
To put that absorption in context, regular readers will know that, however right wing I am, I am not a connoisseur of motoring media. As someone who passed their driving test at the seventh attempt, and celebrated by crashing my vehicle into a motorway bridge just a few months later, someone who doesn’t know what it is the petrol does in the engine that the oil doesn’t do, and someone who took 16 months before finding out which button to press to get the cleaning fluid out for the windscreen wipers, I am not what you might call a petrol-head.
Yet I find Top Gear a treat and have noted that some of the finest writers about cars (Neil Lyndon, Quentin Letts and my parliamentary colleague Boris Johnson) are also either temperamental, cultural or ideological conservatives.
There may be objective reasons why conservatives and cars (except in my case) mix so well. The car is a liberator, which frees you from reliance on collective provision; it’s a private space one can shape to suit one’s own or one’s family’s tastes and one of the last warm places where you can still smoke (though not for much longer).
And cars, like Conservatives, seem to attract similar enemies: Ken Livingstone, Liberal Democrat councils, Guardian columnists. There does seem to be some sort of relationship between those who love motoring and a certain sort of buccaneering Toryism.
And yet in my, admittedly brief, tenure behind the wheel I fear I may have been drifting just a tad to the Left. And I’m not talking about my poor lane discipline. There are certain things about driving in the Home Counties and London which incline one to troubling impulses of a nannyish kind. Actually, make that Stalinist.
Take tailgating. It’s a rare journey you make these days without, at some point, a hyper-aggressive pursuer driving right up behind you in an effort to register his annoyance at your own tardy progress. As someone who is not just temperamentally but professionally inclined to respect the speed limits, it is sometimes possible to avoid your back bumper being grazed at every twist in the road only by hurtling precipitately above the legal limit. Whenever I look in my mirror to see some aerated figure hunched over his wheel just inches behind me, his features bearing the strain of having a foot hovering permanently over the accelerator, I wonder if perhaps there’s something to be said for restraint rather than liberation.
And that same instinct, the belief that perhaps, when we have a tempered steel beast at our disposal, we tend to forget there is such a thing as society, strikes me with equal force when I contemplate the proliferation of really huge vehicles barrelling down the capital’s residential streets. I know that having a go at the drivers of 4x4s is as stale as a service station sandwich. I also know that those cars are vital in rural areas and they are the sort of environmental controversy-magnets discussion of which is best left to real experts like Camilla Cavendish. But I also can’t help feeling that some of the people behind the wheels of these behemoths have bought the security they clearly feel they need at the expense of a rounded consideration for the rest of us road users. They tend to pound the streets with a somewhat heavier tread than the rest of us. I’m sure you know what I mean.
And talking of consideration for others, one of the other phenomena I’ve noticed is the annoyance, bordering on rage, I encounter whenever I have to slow other people’s progress by either taking the time necessary to park safely outside my house, or decant children from the car. I’ve lost count of the number of people who, on seeing a babe in arms being extracted from a car’s rear seat see this as either a grotesque imposition on their freedom to career down the road, or even a reason to accelerate.
In every case driving seems to go hand-in-hand with, at best, an insouciant indifference to others and, at worst, hostility to their presence – an obstacle to getting one’s own way. I am exasperated with these trends and desperate to see courtesy restored on the highways. Does that make me a sucker for Stalinist centralism, or a crusty reactionary nostalgic for an age of leather-gloved chivalry behind the wheel?
One thing is certain. Whichever extreme that driving has made me lurch towards, I am certainly not happy to be in the middle of the road any more.
At the risk of putting my foot in it . . .
I read with interest last weekend that the average husband in Britain is 40 (check), married with two children (check), has a 37in waist (yup) owns 22 pairs of socks and makes love eight times a month.
Imagine my surprise on reading that the average figure is so high. That certainly puts me in my place. Where have I gone wrong? I suppose it has been my insistence on doing things the traditional way. I know it makes me dull, but at least you know what you’re getting.
I suspect that I have so few pairs of socks because I insist on getting woollen ones in charcoal grey.
And may I say thank you to all those who wrote in with suggestions on where to get good-quality woollen socks now that even my beloved Marks & Spencer seems to have gone over to cotton. The consensus is that the company to try is the reassuringly Caledonian-sounding concern of Scott-Nichol.
They’re more expensive than your standard hosiery buy, but the wool lends them a hardiness that other fabrics won’t have, and judicious darning can extend their lifespan beyond that of most mammals. Anyway, Sarah, if you’re reading this, at least that’s this Christmas sorted.
The Poliakoff puzzle
Have you ever met anyone who has enjoyed a Stephen Poliakoff television play?
Really? So much so they would watch it again all the way through?
Yes, he gets fantastic casts to bring his stuff alive, but not since the Tory election campaign of 1830 has so much talent been put at the service of such poor material.
Isn’t it time we invested all that television cash in a proper contemporary writer such as Howard Jacobson or Ian McEwan?
— Michael Gove is Conservative MP for Surrey Heath
Michael Gove is Conservative MP for Surrey Heath. He worked on The Times from 1995-2005. He makes regular appearances on BBC Radio 4's The Moral Maze and The Late Review on BBC2, and has written a biography of Michael Portillo
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles
Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I'm amazed by some comments.
The car has brought huge benefits to our economy and quality of life. Its not all positive - no kind of change ever is - but you can't take the benefits for granted just quote the down side. Thats like turning down a salary because all you can see is the tax! The countryside would be derelict without cars, now it thrives.
I'm a pedestrian & cyclist but i dont recognise the picture painted of fear on our streets caused by cars - its rubbish. Sure, there are exceptional examples of bad behaviour by motorists just like cyclists can be abusive, but you cant blame the mode of transport.
As for emissions, its the buses and taxis that cause most of the pollution, but this is being cleaned up like it already has been on cars. On CO2, a large bus does 5mpg and, even in London, carries 14 people on average. Put two people in a small car and you get the same!
And I do wonder how limiting 4x4s to 55mph will help make the streets safer...
Nigel Humphries, Worcester,
The paradox is that whilst the car is perhaps inherently right wing, the road itself, free to use, taxpayer funded and made possible by compulsory purchase is not. The road in fact is a collectivist enterprise without equal. It is also a scarce resource, which is where all the problems are. So rather than being right wing motoring is actually the modern capitalist economy in minature, freewheeling private enterprise and liberty utterly dependent on a publicly maintained infrastructure.
Tom , London,
Where does Michael Gove find the time and money to build his own private roads, seeing as, presumably, he has been liberated from driving on the collectively provided ones the rest of us drive on?
Tom Harke, London, England
Can it really matter which 'wing ' you consider yourself belonging to when you consider the polluting aspects of car use? In the age of global warming - which even short-sighted government ministers say is a fact - surely all drivers are morally culpable whether its a 4x4 or a 2CV fate has them steering. I'm sure I'm not alone to find it amazing that in the year 2007 such a glib article on motoring can still be written! As the man from Bucharest meant to write: get with the program!
Rakibuddin Ahmed, Edgware, Middlesex
Perhaps if our local comrades committes could see further than the big bucks in their coffers offered by the supermarkets we could retain our local shops and market stalls and not need our cars to lug the shopping for three miles or more. Its not just the car that depletes and pollutes the urban environment ...
If you're going to be tough on the cause of a problem then look harder for the real cause instead of jumping on the sometimes inconvenient solution instead!
KR, Stockport,
To John from Lison, I can not agree with you more. And BIKES RULE.
Strummin' Ronin, London,
I hope Richard from Bucharest is joking when he says:
"Adopt Defensive / Aggressive tactics when tailgated threeatened on the highway - Always challenge tailgaters by changing pace frequently - put them on the defensive - an accident is their fault."
I thought the general aim when driving was to avoid accidents, not to cause them in such a way that you can pin the blame on others.
I am impressed by the thought of anyone having 22 pairs of socks. I myself have a drawer full of the critters. But can I ever find a matched pair in the morning?
Simon, London,
I think what Michael Gove has written about cars is fascinating and very important for the future of Conservatism and of Britain.
Thats because it illustrates the schism in right wing thinking - should the right celebrate freedom and personal choice or despise it as a threat to law, order, courtesy and the traditions of Britain that conservatives are supposed to defend?
The car is a perfect example of this doublethink - and the right will never regain power until it knows what it believes!
I am chuckling at the thought of the apoplexy that will afflict Peter Hitchens when he reads this - he hates cars and mistakenly thinks that is a right wing, reactonary thing to do! But he would be right that a desire for courtesy and respect is certainly not a province of the left. It just should not be confused with the bullying approach to rules that penalises the letter of increasingly unreasonable laws irrespective of courtesy and shows no respect or understanding of driving skills.
Nigel Humphries, Worcester,
How does the motor car equal freedom? Freedom to breath clean air, freedom to live in a quiet environment, freedom to use our streets and roads without fear all have been taken away by the selfish car user. The motor car brings few benefits to society and damages our countrys economy. Far from being a Tory plaything the motor car is far closer to Anarchy. I for one will happily vote for whichever political party has the vision to liberate our society from the true cause of terror in our lives. By the way the correct response to being tailgated is to slow down and increase the amount of clear road in front of you.
Clive Stringer, Eggesford, Devon
How right Michael is about 4x4 drivers. Here's one solution. Fit all 4x4s with speed limiters with a top speed of 55mph. Then you don't inconvenience farmers who genuinely need them; you cut greenhouse gas emissions and you make these monstrosities much less attractive as a yuppie fashion accessory as well as making the urban streets a lot safer for the rest of us. Mr Davies needs to remember that liberty means you can do what you want so long as you don't prevent others from doing what they want. Smoking in pubs and driving like lunatics do just that.
Hugh Schollick, Southport, UK
Ah well, it was inevitable at some point that the paid opinionated would decide it was time to have a go at Stephen Poliakoff. Mr Gove's comments tell you more about his value as a critic than Poliakoff's as a playwright.
Tim Powell, Bath,
What happened to ending the war on the motorist? Not so long ago that was an official Conservative Party pamphlet.
I personally don't recognise the over-generalised and gloomy vision Mr Gove spells out. Many motorists are decent everyday people, happy to stop and let a mum with a pram cross.
If his rather dismissive tone is now typical of his party, heaven help the Conservatives. They are so concerned on eco-posturing on Cloud Nine that they have become out of touch with the public.
They have already failed to spot that opposing road user charging is the silver bullet that will despatch Gordon and win the next election.
B D Mooney, Fulham, UK
As more and more of our free choices in life are outlawed - driving, smoking, expressing a genuine opinion, running businesses in a competitive way - the more we will behave like the outlaws we have been branded! All this communistic social engineering changes no-one, it just increasingly privileges the creatures and apparatchiks of The Party while disenfranchising every free spirit. Government never used to work with such total antipathy to the grain of human nature, and, to the extent that the system tolerated them, people tolerated and worked within the system. The creeping communism of Britain is ensuring that increasing numbers of people no longer cleave to the established society. In their hearts and minds they are either just the stubbornly individualistic enraged by constant persecution, or are (no doubt) quietly forming new groupings and alliances beyond the hostile gaze of Big Brother ... This is not a healthy politics or a healthy society.
Philip Davies, Abderystwyth, Wales, U.K.
You could just get out of the way
John, Lisbon, Portugal
I am not a labour voter and I love cars. For all their drawbacks they still represent a vision of personal freedom that many, many many people aspire to. Not everyone lives in towns/cities or boroughs run by communists who wish thwart every private vehicle on the road. Much of the hullabaloo raised by the anti-car mob is not anti-car at all, but anti-car driver in the sense that they are enraged by the principle that they cannot "control" the person who is the car driver. Hence the onslaught of anti-car (driver) hysteria from "Comrade" Ken amongst others. To those souls who have to commute to work on congested roads, stop it now! Really, you should stop torturing yourselves and get your local Comrade Committee to fully support you and your family, after all that's what government is for, isn't it? Of course for us non townies, nothing beats a 3 mile hike to the shops and carrying all your shopping home does it. If you don't like cars then don't buy one but just get off my back!
Car Driver & Voter, Devon, UK
I am a conservative and I detest cars, which destroy traditional patterns of life. The car creates suburban sprawl and robs everyone but the very rich and the very poor of the opportunity of living in a quality urban environment where they can complete most necessary journeys on foot - and it is that which is the best type of transport "freedom" there is. There is no "freedom" involved in a long commute on congested roads that is undertaken out of financial necessity. The car has also ruined the countryside.
Oliver Chettle, Bedford,
All my socks are dark blue.
Get with the programme - You cannot successfully legislate against changing mindsets - You can influence by your Responsive behaviour.
Adopt Defensive / Aggressive tactics when tailgated threeatened on the highway - Always challenge tailgaters by changing pace frequently - put them on the defensive - an accident is their fault.
If you need some extreme driving conditions to compare with UK - come drive in Romania - amongst all the Porsche Cayennes, Bentley, Aston Martins & Ferraris doing Grand Prix starts at Bucharest city centre traffic lights.
Driving in UK then becomes a pleasure.
> 2 million miles without accident speaks for itself - Lucky...
Richard, Bucharest, Romania