Interviewed by Fraser Nelson for the latest edition of The Spectator, David Cameron says he has four priorities: “The deficit, Afghanistan, the broken society and mending the mess of our politics.”
But what do these priorities add up to? What is 'Cameronism'? What is the vision?
In the main feature for the latest edition of Prospect magazine, The Guardian's Julian Glover attempts to answer those questions and does so persuasively. The article's introduction is here but the full copy is only available to subscribers.Two big themes emerge: (1) information and (2) society.
Glover writes:
"The starting point will be to flood the public sector with information. No budget will be secret or hard to track down. Go to the website of a government agency at the moment, and it is all but impossible to discover what it spends or what its top staff are paid. Cameron’s team place great faith in technology and openness as a substitute for the bodies that control public service provision. They point to price comparison websites such as moneysupermarket.com. Do not underestimate the immediate impact of massive doses of information, they say, pointing to what happened when MPs’ expenses were revealed."
Then there is this:
Do these make sense to you as two pathways to a smaller state? One path is an information revolution that produces internet-age accountability for the state. As Glover notes, that internet-age transparency has already produced a revolution in the Commons. What will it do to local government? To the NHS? To the BBC?"The most important soundbite of his leadership was his first: “There is such a thing as society, it’s just not the same as the state.”"
Continue reading "Cameron's two pathways to the dismantling of the centralised, powerful state" »
Recent Comments