This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Billinger, M. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Another Look at Ethnicity as a Biological Concept

Moving Anthropology Beyond the Race Concept

University of Alberta, Edmonton

Montagu referred to race as ‘man’s most dangerous myth’, while Lévi-Strauss called it ‘the original sin of anthropology’. Although persuasive arguments against the concept of race were made throughout the 20th century, race remains a particular problem for anthropologists who deal in the classification of human populations. Racial terminology has been perpetuated within anthropology largely owing to the fact that, historically, race formed the very core of anthropological study. Despite the conceptual inadequacy of race, the anthropological enterprise has yet to move beyond it as an explanatory tool for understanding human biological variation because of the lack of a conceptual and/or methodological replacement. This article re-analyses historical anthropological literature on ethnicity and biocultural interaction as a replacement for the race concept, and recasts it in the context of modern philosophical and psychological perspectives on population variation.

Key Words: biocultural • ethnicity • human variation • physical anthropology • race

Critique of Anthropology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 5-35 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0308275X07073815


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?