www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Commentators

null 9° London Hi 11°C / Lo 3°C

Editor-At-Large: Wedding bells to wedding hell in one generation

Janet Street-Porter

Marriage couldn't be more unattractive – the number of us getting hitched has slumped to the lowest level since records began, 150 years ago. By next year, it's predicted that singletons will be in the majority.

There are all sorts of reasons why we don't fancy tying the knot any more – and the biggest is undoubtedly cost. The average wedding now won't leave you any change from an astonishing £21,000 – twice as much as a decade ago. In a recession, anyone contemplating such financial lunacy needs to start saving years ahead, or embark on married life in debt. You could buck the trend and do it simply – but if you're participating in a dying ritual, then surely you'll want it to be memorable?

No wonder the age we get married has risen over the years, to 30 for women and 31 for men – about 10 years older than our parents. Another factor in the decline of marriage is the lack of tax incentives – why bother going through with it if you're no better off? Labour has been so anxious not to discriminate against single mothers and one-parent families, and so keen to provide financial assistance to the disadvantaged, that they've omitted to sufficiently reward those who are in a stable relationship, raising children within the framework of a marriage. The result? Young women who have kids and claim housing benefit without marrying, and who marginalise men.

A long-term partnership like marriage is not an attractive option; they want to live without the restrictions of a full-time, live-in partner. Instead, they have a series of relationships, producing children who treat a succession of men as temporary dads.

By contrast, a couple in their twenties contemplating marriage have almost no chance of finding a place to live that they can afford to buy. After school or college, young people are stuck at home for longer than any previous generation (their grandparents would have buggered off at 16 or 18). They're living in their childhood bedrooms – with a smaller living space than many prisoners – and thousands are crippled with massive student loans. Last week, graduates were told to set their sights low, if they wanted work, so what chance of ever affording the luxury of a wedding? It all begins to sound like something you only see in the movies. And if it takes you longer to leave home, get a job and finally taste independence, who'd want to chuck it all up to get hitched? Doesn't sound that appealing somehow.

The church can bleat on about marriage being a "life-time commitment" but that's not how people think these days. In an age of social networking, speed dating and internet chat-rooms, young people are genuinely confused about what constitutes a relationship, let alone one that's supposed to last more than a couple of months.

Peaches Geldof's short-lived marriage to New York musician Max Drummey is typical – it lasted only 186 days. Apparently her elder sister, Fifi, read they had decided to divorce on the internet, and was the family member who told father. But I don't blame Peaches; she's just 19, and Max 24. I went through a bonkers marriage to an unsuitable young man in Las Vegas which didn't last as long as they managed, and I was 49 at the time.

Another reason why we're shunning marriage is the expense of splitting up. If you make a mistake, or just get bored with each other, the only people who benefit are the lawyers. There's a lot to be said for Islamic law – sharia – and just saying "I divorce thee" three times; it would certainly have saved me many thousands of pounds. Are men being put off marriage because of the large settlements some high-profile wives such as Karen Parlour and Heather Mills McCartney have managed to win in recent years? I'm not sure, because the number of men who then go on and remarry a woman who just looks like a younger version of their first wife is definitely on the increase. In divorce, ultimately it's middle-aged women who suffer the most, because their chances of remarriage are very slim indeed.

Marriage is going out of fashion for a variety of reasons, and I don't think things will change. I just hope we don't all end up poor, single and alone in our old age, with only a load of old photos of the fun times along the way to keep us company, because that's the future for the me-generation.

Twitter, twitter, twitter... yawn

The latest social networking craze, Twitter – where users send 140-character messages in real time – attracts high-profile fans from Barack Obama to Stephen Fry, Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross. Discontent is growing in the ranks, however, with the English language suffering as a result. "The newbies have taken over", and "tweeple are jumping on the bandwagon" are two complaints posted on the internet, but that hasn't stopped the number of Twitterers growing exponentially – last week 600 partied in London (one of 174 such events around the globe) raising money to supply clean water to third-world countries. Organisers claim they raised £700,000. Why this desperate need to communicate utter banalities? People in most offices spend up to an hour a day on Facebook, and now they can waste even more time telling pals they're in a lift, eating cake or hung-over. In my book, those who communicate the most have the least to say.

Boris and his big north 'n' south

Boris Johnson also tweets, when he's not using the F-word. Screaming profanities isn't confined to working-class big mouths like Gordon Ramsay – a private conversation (rant is a better description) Boris had with pompous MP Keith Vaz was leaked, revealing expletives in every sentence from London's blond bombshell.

The row was over whether Boris tipped off David Cameron that police had just arrested Damian Green, and subsequently tried to cover his tracks by altering the time they had spoken. It's more worrying that after Boris was asked to call Mr Vaz back, someone recorded a private conversation without his knowledge. Swearing hardly reveals the ugly side of Boris Johnson, or that he's a bully. We knew Boris was capable of duplicity – look at his complicated love life. Londoners were happy to elect Boris as Mayor. He's got a personality they can relate to – big, brash, never short of a joke – or a swear word. Bit like the Cockneys of yesteryear.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Blame it on equal opportunity
[info]mackname wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 06:50 am (UTC)
Marriage only works when one can provides security and finacial stability and the othe one won't, for stupidity or ingeniosness.
It is as plain and obsolete as that.
Marriage
[info]katiecurrantbun wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 09:08 am (UTC)
I wonder if middle -aged women want to remarry. I married in the seventies, and stayed married for 22 years, despite being pretty unhappy for most of them. But looking around, all off my friends seemed to be experiencing the same kind of marriage, and to be honest I guess it was no better than we expected.
Having been diivorced for 10 years now I find myself living a much more genuine and fulfilling life, and I don't have to worry about meeting a man's expectations- whatever they are!
I like being in a relationship, from time to time, but I would never get married again. Men of my age still want the same things from a wife; they want to be looked after and flattered. That's why they get married again- it's not like they have learned anything.

It would be nice to find an independent man with his own interests and circle of friends (and life skills!) who doesn't see marriage as the necessary end result.
They seem to be pretty scarce.
No thanks, I'll just stay an unmarried middle-aged woman; it's much more interesting.
Re: Marriage
[info]sara_sense wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 11:31 am (UTC)
Good for you. The way I look at it, relationships are about enjoying the person's company. If I ever get married I'd never change my name or become 'Mrs' anything. My name is Ms. Myname and the person I marry would be Mr. Hisname so (with the exception of marrying someone with a name a lot better than mine!) why should that change? As you say, it's not about flattery and looking after someone anymore, (which taking on Mr's Hisname implies imho) it's about partnership and companionship. Get rid of the imbalance!
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 09:48 am (UTC)
Marriage is going out of fashion for a variety of reasons, yes indeed, and the main reason has been, as you say, financial: in the recent good times of easy money and high employment and equal opportunities women have been able to manage getting a house and raising a family without having a husband, either by getting well paid work themselves, or by staying at home and being well paid and housed by the state to do so;

hard times are now with us and it will soon take two ( or even more) adults to house and bring up a family- marriage has never really been about anything more than economic necessity in hard times;

widen your worlds and take a look at all the different breeds of ducks and their assorted domestic arrangements: from hard-pressed caring shellduck in stable long term pairing in difficult lifestyles and environments, to wham-bang-thankyou-mam mallards with no shortage of food or territories; i always wanted to be a shellduck but i seemed only to attract mallards...
Ducks
[info]goosegreece wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 12:08 pm (UTC)
Careful.....I think you`re going quackers.
[info]nullius123 wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 12:06 pm (UTC)
Janet says we have "omitted to sufficiently reward those who are in a stable relationship, raising children within the framework of a marriage."

If relationships require taxpayer's money to work, we're in even deeper doo-doo than she thinks. We have to put an end to this idea that marriage should be encouraged and rewarded - it's social engineering and in any other context we shudder at the thought.

If two people (or even three or four people) decide to throw in their lots together I say good luck and three cheers to them, but it is time we stopped setting up this supposedly virtuous cultural round hole, and then complain when we can't force an increasing number of square pegs through it.
[info]dls84 wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 02:59 pm (UTC)
24, training to be a barrister, massive student debt, and reading this sitting in my childhood bedroom... I daydream about shopping for my own sofa!
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 08:13 am (UTC)
oh poor you - wake up. grow up and face reality; if you don't like what you find yourself doing, try something else; maybe you can't afford to be a barrister - so what, you are not alone - and you are lucky enough to have parents to put up with you?
No romance with finance baby
[info]wormery wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 04:18 pm (UTC)
No man in his right mind would get married these days - when his wife can, for no reason at all, divorce him, steal his house and 70% of his assets, and then prevent him from seeing his kids too.

Men - look after yourselves and keep your money for yourselves too. There's no romance without finance baby - and all men buy sex, and women tend to sell it - why women go for rich, high-atatus men. Romance is a myth. A dream. A mental abberration that lasts three years chemically in the brain - enough time for an ape to give birth and the offspring to be on their own feet. Marriage just ain;t worth it.

Just enjoy being with women, then when it all falls apart walk away with your bulging wallet in tact. Make sure you get to see your kids though and demand equal custody. How? Make sure wifie gets off her fat arse and works too so you can claim to be an equal carer. If you work and support her, she'll say she's the main carer and steal your kids (and so we have family annihilators...) Fifty years ago, I would have said to women to protect themselves and their money - now, in our misandrist, gyne-centric society it's the opposite. Men and boys are massivley discriminated against (in law, in education, in the workplace) so need to look after themselves as selfishly as possible. Ex-wives can whistle. Men, protect your assets.

The thing is, is women are supposedly so damn independednt, why can they not pay for themselves? And why do they need ANY money at all after a divorce - for services rendered is it?... As usual women want things both ways. Well, I think we should end this scam. Each marriage partner is independent so each gets what they put in financially in a divorce. Sounds fair to me. Then, when men know their ex-wives won;t steal their wealth, maybe more will get married.

Or perhaps, we men now realise marriage was just a scam started by women to entrap us and steal our money anyway?
[info]matttt wrote:
Sunday, 15 February 2009 at 11:08 pm (UTC)
By contrast, a couple in their twenties contemplating marriage have almost no chance of finding a place to live that they can afford to buy.

Does the massive transfer of wealth from young to old brought about by asset inflation really have any bearing on whether or not they marry, when unmarried cohabitation has the exact same challenge to face?
Isn't it obvious?
[info]wasabista wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 09:54 am (UTC)
You've missed the gorilla in the living room.

The biggest reason for the decline in marriage is that it (mostly) takes a guy and a girl, and the guys aren't having any of it anymore. Why get married when the courts can take your assets, earnings and, oh yes, the children away at a whim? The ladies have nothing to lose, the fellas have nothing to gain and their entire lives to lose.
Re: Marriage
[info]margaux82 wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 12:57 pm (UTC)
What a depressing view of the world! I am 26 and about to get married (for the first time) and cannot believe that young people in a loving relationship would deny themselves this pleasure. Without even trying, my partner and I are spending a fraction of the cost of "an average wedding" and that includes a church ceremony, reception on a boat and a two-week honeymoon in Cuba! Surely the escalating cost isn't the primary factor in people's decision not to get married. Some people simply just don't want to get married. Who are we to judge.

Columnist Comments

yasmin_alibhai_brown

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: What planet are our critics on?

There’s an extreme dissonance between consumers of art and those who judge it

bruce_anderson

Bruce Anderson: Israel is trapped and peace is remote

A crass failure of moral sensitivity has led to crass strategic misjudgment.

simon_carr

Simon Carr: Here's how to make a real apology

Those saying sorry show no remorse, don’t repent, and are not contrite