Welcome to Prof. Khaleel Mohammed's Web site
This page is designed to meet the needs of students and others
interested in the work of San Diego State University professor
Khaleel Mohammed.
Thank you for visiting my site.
Prof. Khaleel Mohammed's Research Interests
Islamic Law (Classical and Modern)
Comparative Religion
Jewish/Christian/Islamic encounter
Qur'anic exegesis (Classical and Modern)
Hadith
Gender/Sex Issues and Sexuality in Islam
Terrorism
Anti-Semitism in Islamic/Islamist Material
Arab-Israeli Relations
Reform in Islam
Important Note
I have been bombarded with several queries regarding my "discussion" on frontpagemag.com, and the subsequent inimical webpostings on Jihadwatch etc. Most of the queries have addressed my apparent silence in the face of attacks on my position regarding Islamic reformation, and my alleged lack of coming to terms with certain aspects of Islamic "truths."
I consider myself a scholar and therefore prefer to engage in
discussion where facts, rather than fictions and prejudgments
are presented. When therefore I am told that the pope apologised
for the Crusades, or that Jihad only means war, or that I have
to accept interpretations of the Quran that non-Muslims (with
no good intentions or knowledge of Islam) seek to force upon me,
I see a certain agendum developing: one that is based on hate,
and I refuse to be part of such an intellectual crime.
There are certain stereotypes that extremists try to sell to the
public: that all Arab countries are racist, closed to free discussion.
I can only state that from my experience, I have encountered racism,
anti-semitism, as well as free discussion in Arab countries--the
same as I have encountered in the U.S. Indeed the hateful material
that I have seen on the internet has come largely NOT from the
Arabs and Muslims (although they are not free from blame), but
rather from hatemongers based right here in the United States.
One always has to ask the question Cui Bono? My position on the
State of Israel has understandably gained the attention of many
activists. The interests of some of these activists, however,
as is manifest, have not been out of goodwill--rather they seek
to get me to join them in their Islamophobia, Arabophobia, and
latent Judeophobia. How can I view it otherwise when an evangelist
proselytizer wants to tell me that all Muslims must belong to
one of four sects--this means then that the Zaidis, the Ismailis,
the Shias, the Ahmadis--to name just a few--are not Muslims? It
means too that I-despite my declarations--am not Muslim, for I
chose to identify with none of the medieval sectarian movments..I
simply say that I am a Muslim.
In a discussion on Islam, I am told to "go back to my country."
This presupposes that all Muslims are aliens--forgetting that
the first Muslims in America were slaves--who did not come here
out of their own free will. My position on Israel is free from
any hidden motive: it is based on my reading of the Qur'an, one
that I must admit places me at odds with many of my coreligionists.
I certainly do not support Israel so that the in-gathering of
the Jews can fulfill the parousia, and they be converted to Christianity.
This to me is latent anti-semitism. Nor do I support a Jewish
land in Israel so that I can convert Jews to Islam. This would
be latent Judeophobia.
I have also been informed that I am now portrayed as a Jihadist
by some since I refuse to apologise for Jihad in the Qur'an. I
certainly refuse to apologise for Jihad--which is a defensive
war fought against those who declare war on Islam. That many Muslim
regimes have confused Jihad and War is something that I admit
to--but their crime is their own, and I do not have to apologize
for that--no more than I expect every Christian to apologize to
every Muslim and every Jew for the crimes committed in the name
of Jesus during the crusades.
I am also now informed that there is one website wherein I am
quoted out of context. I am vilified for saying that I oppose
Christian missionary activity in Saudi Arabia. This somehow has
been taken to mean that I oppose democracy, women's rights etc.
I don't see the connection: I think Saudi Arabia is a sovereign
country, and has the right, in fact, the duty to its citizens
to keep them from missionary activity if it so chooses. In the
same article I mentioned that I am against both Muslim and Christian
missionary activity--and this has been taken to suggest that I
want the US to become a Muslim nation. Again, I don't see the
connection. And I don't know of concerted Muslim missionary activity
here in the US, except probably among the Nation of Islam's followers--who
concentrate on the Black community. The Nation of Islam is made
up of Americans, not immigrants, and their activity is their business.
What is particularly painful to me is that people who portray
themselves as followers of religion should seek to shamelessly
misquote and lie, eschewing all ethics in their calumny, because
I do not agree with them. But as Jesus is supposed to have said:
Ye shall know them by their fruits. (Matt 7.16).
I choose not to respond personally to certain slurs and insults
because the error in the first place was mine: a professor of
religion should not seek learned discussion with those whose views
are clouded by faith. Fortunately for me, I am in the United States
where, despite the actions of a miniscule few, this country happens
to be a haven where, for the most part, the freedom of speech
is something sacred. This does not give me the right to purvey
hate on the internet, or to engage in ad-hominem exchanges which
say more about the people that sling them rather than those against
whom their venom is directed. If anyone wishes to have up-front,
honest dialogue with me, with no hidden agenda or malice aforethought,
I welcome this. Even if we disagree, at least, I would like to
think that we can do so while granting respect to each other.
At least we can live, if not in harmony, at least in a coexistence
of tolerance.
Khaleel Mohammed.