Historians and Institutional Review Boards: A Brief Bibliography
Begley, Sharon. “Review Boards Pose Threat to Tough Work by Social Scientists.” Wall Street Journal, November 1, 2002, B1.
Bliss, Alan. "Oral History Research." In Institutional Review Board Management and Function, edited by Robert J. Amdur, M.D. and Elizabeth A. Bankert. Sudbury, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2002.
Brainard, Jeffrey.
"The Wrong Rules for Social Science?" The Chronicle of Higher Education,
March 9, 2001, A21. Available at http://chronicle.com
for those with a subscription to the Chronicle.
Church, Jonathan T., Linda Shopes,
and Margaret A. Blanchard, “Should All Disciplines Be Subject to the Common
Rule?” Academe 88:3 (May-June 2002),
62-69.
http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/02mj/02mjftr.htm
COSSA Washington Update. http://www.cossa.org
Newsletter of the Consortium of Social
Science Associations; provides regular coverage of current federal
issues/debates/actions related to human subjects review; searchable online.
Division of Contracts, Policy, and
Oversight, National Science Foundation, “Frequently Asked Questions and Vignettes: Interpreting the Common Rule for the
Protection of Human Subjects for Behavioral and Social Science Research,” http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/cpo/policy/hsfaqs.htm
A useful website for understanding
and interpreting the Common Rule as it applies to nonbiomedical research.
Gordon, Michael, “Historians and
Review Boards,” Perspectives, 35:6
(September 1997), 35-37.
Includes a sample description of
an oral history project for IRB review.
Gunsalus, C. K., “Rethinking
Protections for Human Subjects, Chronicle
of Higher Education, November
15, 2002, B24.
Human Subject Protection Regulations and Research Outside
the Biomedical Sphere, a
working conference sponsored by
the College of Law, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, April 11-12,
2003; [position papers available at http://www.law.uiuc.edu/conferences/humansubject/papers.asp]
National Commission for the
Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the
Protection of Human Subjects of Research.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
[http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm
The landmark federal report that
defined the fundamental ethical principles to govern research on human
subjects.
Nelson, Cary, “Can E.T. Phone
Home? The Brave New World of University
Surveillance,” Academe, 89
(September/October 2003).
http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/03so/03sonels.htm
Oral History Evaluation Guidelines, rev. ed. Carlisle,
Pa.: Oral History Association, 2000.
http://www.dickinson.edu/oha/Evaluation_Guidelines.html
“Protecting Human Beings:
Institutional Review Boards and Social Science Research,” Academe, 87:3 (May-June 2001), 55-67. http://www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/repirb.htm
A thorough discussion of the
difficulties of applying regulations developed within a biomedical frame to
nonbiomedical research; useful as a reference in discussions with IRBs.
Sieber, John E., Stuart Platter,
and Philip Rubin, “How (Not) to Regulate Social and Behavioral Research,” Professional Ethics Report, XV:2 (Spring
2002), 1-3.
http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/per/per29.htm#cover
Shea, Christopher, “Don’t Talk to
the Humans: The Crackdown on Social Science Research,” Linguafranca, 10:6 (September 2000), 27-34 .
http://www.linguafranca.com/print/0009/humans.html
Shopes, Linda, “Institutional
Review Boards Have a Chilling Effect on Oral History,” AHA Perspectives, 38:6 (September 2000), 34-37.[ http://www.theaha.org/perspectives/issues/2000/0009/0009vie1.cfm ]
----------, “Historians and
Human-Subjects Research, Recent Science
Newsletter, 2:3 (Spring 2001), 6ff.
Sieber, John E., Stuart Platter,
and Philip Rubin, “How (Not) to Regulate Social Behavioral Research,”
Professional Ethics Report, 15 (Spring 2002), 1-3
http://www.aaas.org/spp/spfrl/per/per29.htm#cover
Speers, Marjorie A.,
“Accreditation Helps Researchers and Subjects Alike,” APS [American Psychological Society] Observer, 16 (May 2003), 9.
Title 45 (Public Welfare) Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 46 (Protection of Human Subjects).
[ http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm ] These are the federal regulations governing research on
human subjects, available at the website of the Office of Human Research
Protections/US Department of Health & Human Services, which has
responsibility for implementing them.
OHRP’s website includes considerable additional information related to
the regulations, their implications, and implementation. Home page is http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/index.html.
Vagts, Rachel, “Clashing
Disciplines: Oral History and the Institutional Review Board,” Archival Issues 26:2 (2002), 145-152.
[Prepared by Linda Shopes,
Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission]