More from the Macula Society Meeting- Reinjection Intervals for Wet AMD (June 2007)
Dr. Mark Johnson reported on his results following 15 patients with wet AMD after a single dose of Avastin®. He found that the fluid within or under the retina resolved in 67% of the patients by the fourth week after the injection and that it had resolved in 73% of patients by eight weeks. There were three of the 15 patients who had continued resolution of the fluid between 4 and 8 weeks. He believed that these results indicate that Avastin can be injected at intervals of two months, (eight weeks), or perhaps even longer. Most retinal doctors have been giving Avastin at intervals of six weeks or even every four weeks.
We are still trying to figure out how to maximize the visual results while minimizing the number of injections. We could, as in the MARINA trial, just give Lucentis® every month for two years. This pretty much insures us the greatest chance of getting and keeping the retina dry and perhaps would give us the best visual results. But we also know that many of these patients really don’t need all of this injections since many stay stable for long periods of times after the first three injections.
We can also use schemes like used in the PRONTO study where we follow patients and treat only as needed. This will lessen the number of treatments from thirteen to about six during the first year. It means though that there will be times when the fluid has come back before it’s eliminated by the Lucentis or Avastin. Certainly having fluid in or under the retina for a long period of time is not good for vision. We don’t know how harmful it is for the fluid to be there for a few days or weeks but the PRONTO results were pretty good. Patients can always also return early if their vision gets worse but many times the fluid is seen on the OCT before the patient notices a loss of vision.
The Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials will help us answer this question because there are arms of the trial in which Lucentis and Avastin are given monthly and arms in which, after the first three injections, they are given only as needed.
We are still trying to figure out how to maximize the visual results while minimizing the number of injections. We could, as in the MARINA trial, just give Lucentis® every month for two years. This pretty much insures us the greatest chance of getting and keeping the retina dry and perhaps would give us the best visual results. But we also know that many of these patients really don’t need all of this injections since many stay stable for long periods of times after the first three injections.
We can also use schemes like used in the PRONTO study where we follow patients and treat only as needed. This will lessen the number of treatments from thirteen to about six during the first year. It means though that there will be times when the fluid has come back before it’s eliminated by the Lucentis or Avastin. Certainly having fluid in or under the retina for a long period of time is not good for vision. We don’t know how harmful it is for the fluid to be there for a few days or weeks but the PRONTO results were pretty good. Patients can always also return early if their vision gets worse but many times the fluid is seen on the OCT before the patient notices a loss of vision.
The Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials will help us answer this question because there are arms of the trial in which Lucentis and Avastin are given monthly and arms in which, after the first three injections, they are given only as needed.