www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

UCBHIG
UCB Health Impact Group
and
UCB Health Impact Assessment Course

 

The University of California at Berkeley Health Impact Group (UCBHIG) is a non-partisan, independent collective that emerged from a graduate seminar on HIA at the UC Berkeley School of Public Health.

Health Impact Assessment (HIA) refers to a set of methods and tools used to answer an important question: how do policies, plans, programs, or projects affect health, health behaviors, and social resources necessary for health?  A number of countries and the World Health Organization (WHO) have adopted Health Impact Assessment (HIA) methods to incorporate the consideration of potential health consequences into the review of proposed policies and developments. 

 

 

 


Oak to Ninth Avenue Health Impact Assessment

The Oak to Ninth area comprises approximately 64 acres of waterfront property owned by the Port of Oakland.  According to the City of Oakland, “The proposed project includes up to 3,100 residential units, 200,000 square feet of ground-floor commercial space, 3,500 structured parking spaces, approximately 29.9 acres of public open space, two renovated marinas, and a wetlands restoration area.”  Between February and May of 2006, UCBHIG conducted a HIA analysis of the Oakland Oak to Ninth waterfront development project.  The project was chosen due to its large scope and influence on many determinants of human health.  UCBHIG members did not receive funding for this assessment nor do any members have economic interests in the outcomes of the Oak to Ninth decision.  Several components of the analyses have been communicated to the Oakland City Council and Planning Commission. 

 

        Public Review Draft of the Oak to Ninth Avenue Health Impact Assessment (May 30, 2006):   [ Comment Period May 31 - June 30, 2006 ]

                Executive Summary ES-1 to 8
                Chapter 1. Introduction Intro-1 to 6
                Chapter 2. Planning Process Analysis PPA-1 to 30
                Chapter 3. Parks and Natural Spaces PNS-1 to 12
                Chapter 4. Pedestrian Safety PED-1 to 8
                Chapter 5. Healthy Housing HH-1 to 17
                Chapter 6. Air Quality AQ-1 to 9
                Chapter 7. Noise Noise-1 to 6

                Entire Public Review Draft HIA

                EIR documents for Oak to Ninth, Oakland

Please direct comments and questions on the Oak to Ninth Avenue HIA to ucbhig@gmail.com

 


 

UCB Health Impact Assessment Course

UC Berkeley School of Public Health

Fall Semester 2006

3 Units

PUBLIC HEALTH 298-63                                        CNN 77044

 

Tentative Location and Time:     1st class meets in University Hall room 440, Weds 12-3pm.

                                                    Check website for changes on location and schedule.

 

UCBHIG Private Wiki Site [ http://ehs.sph.berkeley.edu/china/edmund/hia/wiki/ ]

 

The goal of this course is to expose students to the practice and potential of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) with a focus on its application to California’s land use and transportation policy making.  HIA is an emerging public health practice that aims to estimate the health consequences of public decisions and inform and influence decisions so as to promote societal health resources. HIA encompasses diverse methods, tools, and processes by which the potential health impacts of policies, plans, programs, and projects and policies may be evaluated.  Through this course, students review selected HIA case studies and analytic methods for health effects forecasting to understand the potential of HIA as well as the needs and challenges for practice development.  As a class project, students also critically evaluated a local, regional, or state policy, project, or plan, identifying health benefits and consequences, potential approaches to quantify or qualify how the project may change health determinants, and recommendations for alternatives or improvements.

 

Course Objectives:

 

 

Instructors:

 

Rajiv Bhatia

415-252-3982

rajiv.bhatia@sfdph.org         

Edmund Seto

717 University Hall

510-642-9219

seto@uclink.berkeley.edu

Tom Rivard

tom.rivard@sfdph.org

Office Hours:

 

Via Appt.

 

 

Class Format:

 

Instruction will consist of one three hour of lecture and discussion each week.  Assigned exercises will provide hands-on experience with steps and tools in the HIA process. 

 

Final Project:

 

Each student individually or working in a team will complete one “hand’s on” HIA or component of an HIA as a class project.  This HIA would evaluate one or more aspects of a contemporary policy, program, or project and might take one of the following forms:  a quantitative or qualitative analysis of a policy, program, or project’s effects on or more health outcomes; a critical analysis of health analysis in an environmental impact report or other policy analysis, an application of the healthy development measurement tool or another similar structured HIA instrument.  A typical project report would include a structured outline, introduction/background to the pathways relating how the project can potentially benefit or worsen health, identification of any related health-based standards that should be met or could be used to quantify the impacts of the project, a detailed analysis of the project's specific impact, and suggested steps to ensure improvement in health are met, or actions necessary to mitigate adverse health impacts.  Student analysis and findings will be presented orally to the class and as a written report.  The deadline for turning in the final project is 2 days after last day of class.

 

Basis of grading:

            Exercises:                     Class Participation 50%

            Project presentation:      15%

            Project report:                35%

           

Suggested General Texts, Reports, and Periodicals:

 

 

Web Resources on HIA

 

  1. WHO, Gothenburg consensus paper December, 1999, Health Impact Assessment - Main concepts and suggested approach.
  2. WHO, Health impact assessment toolkit for cities
  3. Health Impact Assessment - Designing and Building Healthy Places, CDC
  4. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
  5. South Coast Air Quality Management District on CEQA
  6. California Air Resources Board Land use Guidelines
  7. Eastern Neighborhoods Health Impact Assessment Project Site

 

Class Lecture and Discussion Schedule

 

Class

Date

Topic / Speakers/ Objectives

Readings

Discussion Questions

1

 

Health Determinants, Social Determinants of Health and Environmental Justice

 

Rajiv Bhatia

 

The goal of this week is to define HIA, present its history, and larger global context, present brief examples of how it has been used effectively in policy, describe the focus of this course that deals with policies related to urban growth within California, and present the broader view of a healthy community as described by traditional environmental and social determinants of health.

  1. Kemm – chapters 1-3\
  2. Bhatia, R.  Health Benefits of a Local Living Wage Ordinance. AJPH. 2001.
  3. Dannenberg AL, Jackson RJ, Frumkin H, Schieber RA, Pratt M, Kochtitzky C, Tilson HH. The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: a scientific research agenda. American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93:1500-8.
  4. Cole, B. Methodologies to Realizing the Potential of Health Impact Assessment.
  1. In which current policy settings are human health outcomes explicitly considered and valued?  Why?
  2. For which policy settings are health impacts important but not valued? Why?
  3. Why have so many countries adopted HIA, except for the US?
  4. How does this society define health? What are competing definitions?  How might different definitions of health affect the roles of public health?

2

 

Environmental Impact Assessment—a Regulatory Approach

 

Richard Grassetti

 

The goal of this week is to describe the current environmental review process within the US.  Students will learn the basics about NEPA and CEQA and requirements to conduct health or social analysis.

  1. Kemm – chapter 12
  2. Davies K, Sadler B.  Environmental Assessment and human health: perspectives, approaches, and future directions. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1997
  3. Karkkainen BC. Towards a Smarter NEPA:  Monitoring and managing government’s environmental performance.  Columbia Law Review.  2002;102:903-972.

 

 

  1. How does the EIA process achieve environmental change
  2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the NEPA / CEQA approach to environmental regulation
  3. How does the process for HIA in other international approaches contrast with the approach to EIA in the U.S
  4. In what ways, can the scope of health impacts be broadened under EIA analysis?

3

 

Land Use Development in California: Opportunities and Challenges for Public Health Analysis using the CEQA process

 

Rajiv Bhatia

 

The goal of this week is to understand and evaluate cases studies that use the regulatory framework of EIA to advance health considerations.

  1. Bhatia, R. Protecting Health with Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of San Francisco Land Use Decision-Making. American Journal of Public Health (in press)
  2. Barbour E, Tietz M. CEQA reform: issues and options. Public Policy Institute of California. 2005
  1. Why hasn’t EIA historically included health and social concerns
  2. What are the technical, cultural, and political obstacles today to studying health impacts within EIR?

4

 

Social Impact Assessment: A foundation stone for HIA?

 

Rajiv Bhatia

 

The goal of this week is to understand Social Impact Assessment and how Health Impact Assessment can learn from and build on this practice.  

  1. Slootweg R. Integrating environmental and social impact assessment. In Beker HA and Vanclay F eds. International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment. Edward Elgar Northampton, 2003.
  2. Van Schooten M, Vanclay R, Slootweg R. Conceptualizing social change processes and social impacts. In Beker HA and Vanclay F eds. International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment. Edward Elgar Northampton, 2003.
  3. Rattle, R. Integrating health and social impact assessment. In Beker HA and Vanclay F eds. International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment. Edward Elgar Northampton, 2003.
  4. Federal Highway Administration.  Community Impact Mitigation Case Studies (Available at: http://www.ciatrans.net)
  1. What are the key principles and values of Social Impact Assessment
  2. How is SIA related to EIA and HIA?
  3. How might HIA practitioners build on SIA practice

5

 

Land Use Development in California: An case study of a comprehensive desktop HIA.

 

Rajiv Bhatia, Edmund Seto, Tom Rivard

 

The goal of this week is to review the Oak to Ninth HIA which attempted to critically evaluate priority health effects related to the development of a new infill neighborhood.  

 

  1. Oak to Ninth Avenue Health Impact Assessment (Available at: http://ehs.sph.berkeley.edu/hia/)
  1. What are the key causal relationships / pathways between Oak to Ninth and health? 
  2. What are the missed opportunities for health in this project?
  3. Is the evidence for causal relationships presented in the Oak to Ninth HIA strong enough to make policy-relevant recommendations?

 

6

 

Modeling Noise and Air Quality Impacts of Land Use and Transportation Plans

 

Edmund Seto

Tom Rivard

 

The goal of this week is to examine examples of quantitative modeling techniques developed to estimating how land use and community design changes might affect health via changes in vehicle trips.  We will review efforts to model air quality, noise impact in an urban area.

  1. TBD
  1. How do transportation policies, plans, or projects affect noise and air quality? 
  2. How can risk assessment epidemiology, GIS, and other statistical techniques be applied to build inter-disciplinary planning tools to model noise and air quality impacts?
  3. What skills or partnerships are required to build these tools?

7

 

Modeling the Pedestrian Environment: SF Pedestrian Demand Model, and the Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index, and the Pedestrian Injury Regression Model

 

Cyndy Comerford

Rajiv Bhatia

 

The goal of this week is to examine two examples of quantitative modeling techniques developed to estimate how land use and community design changes might affect pedestrian activity.

  1. Witten.  The Quality of Urban Environments:  Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources.  Urban Studies. 2003; 40: 161-177.
  2. TBD
  1. How do transportation policies, plans, or projects effect pedestrian quality? 
  2. How can risk assessment epidemiology, GIS, and other statistical techniques be applied to build inter-disciplinary planning tools to improve the pedestrian environment?
  3. What skills or partnerships are required to build these tools?

8

 

Qualitative Research for HIA

 

TBD

 

The goal of this week is to examine examples of qualitative research used within HIA.  The Class will also experience a simple structured group dialogue to scope issues for  HIA.

  1. SFDPH Trinity Redevelopment Focus Group
  2. HIA Structured Group Dialogue Case Studies
  1. What is the value and role for qualitative research in HIA?
  2. How might qualitative and quantitative research be conducted in a more integrated way?

9

 

How can HIA serve community voice in planning and policy

 

Margaret Gordon, West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project

Vivian Chang, Asian Pacific Environmental Network

 

The goal of this week is to engage in a discussion with local advocates on how HIA can serve community environmental justice interests.

  1. Arnstein S.  A ladder of citizen participation.  Journal of the American Planning Association 1969; 35(4):216-224.
  2. Keeley J, Scoones I. Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: A Review. Working Paper 89 Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. Sussex 1999
  3. Fung, A, Wright, EO. Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.  Politics and Society. 2001; 29(1):5-41.
  4. Anderson and Jaeger  Danish Participatory Methods

 

 

  1. How might HIA compliment community and experiential knowledge in policy processes?
  2. How might HIA support community positions?
  3. How might HIA be in conflict with community positions?

10

 

Routes towards institutionalization of HIA

 

Richard Jackson, UC Berkeley

TBD, Boalt School of Law

 

The goal of this week is to examine and share what we have learned the politics involved with incorporating HIA into policy decision making.

  1. Kemm Chapters 15,16,27,35
  2. Banken R.  Strategies for institutionalizing HIA.  ECHP Health Impact Assessment Discussion Papers Number 1. Brussels: 2001.  
  1. What are the strengths and weaknesses of various routes towards institutionalization of health considerations in policy and planning?
  2. Which stakeholders might oppose and support HIA and why?

11

 

The Eastern Neighborhood Community Health Impact Assessment: A Case Study multi-stakeholder consensus building planning process

 

Peter Cohen, Asian Neighborhood Design; April Veneracion, South of Market Community Action Network; and Fernando Marti, Asian Neighborhood Design

 

The goal of this week is to examine a multi-stakeholder deliberative version of HIA in the U.S.

 

  1. Kemm Chapter 7
  2. Scott-Samuel A, Birley M & Arden K The Merseyside Guidelines for Health Impact Assessment (Available at: http://www.ihia.org.uk/document/merseyguide3.pdf

 

  1. What did it take to initiate a HIA in San Francisco?
  2. How does the approach and products of ENCHIA differ from traditional EIA and international models of HIA?
  3. What were the key lessons learned from the ENCHIA experience?

12

 

The Healthy Development Measurement Tool: a comprehensive planning support tool for HIA

 

Lili Farhang, SFDPH; Rajiv Bhatia

 

The goal this week will be to review the HDMT, its methodology, and available pilot applications

 

  1. San Francisco Healthy Development Measurement Tool. Available at:  www.sfdph.org/phes/enchia.htm)
  2. Case Studies TBD

 

 

 

13

 

Review of Class Projects I


Rajiv Bhatia, Edmund Seto, and Tom Rivard

 

The goal of this week is to provide group peer review of student projects.

  1. Draft class project reports TBD
  1. What are the key pathways between the social decision and human health outcomes?
  2. What is the actual or potential policy relevance of the health issue?
  3. How has existing policy evaluation (e.g. the EIR) analyzed these pathways
  4. What methodologies might be used to analyze the pathways or effectiveness of mitigations?

14

 

Review of Class Projects II


Rajiv Bhatia, Edmund Seto, and Tom Rivard

 

The goal of this week is to provide group peer review of student projects.

 

  1. Draft class project reports TBD
  1. What are the key pathways between the social decision and human health outcomes?
  2. What is the actual or potential policy relevance of the health issue?
  3. How has existing policy evaluation (e.g. the EIR) analyzed these pathways?
  4. What methodologies might be used to analyze the pathways or effectiveness of mitigations?

15

 

Review of Class Projects III


Rajiv Bhatia, Edmund Seto, and Tom Rivard

 

The goal of this week is to provide group peer review of student projects.

 

  1. Draft class project reports TBD
  1. What are the key pathways between the social decision and human health outcomes?
  2. What is the actual or potential policy relevance of the health issue?
  3. How has existing policy evaluation (e.g. the EIR) analyzed these pathways?
  4. What methodologies might be used to analyze the pathways or effectiveness of mitigations?