What
You're Missing in our subscriber-only CounterPunch newsletter
SPECIAL REPORT: How Iraq is Being
Destroyed
"A
weak Iraq suits many." Three years after the US attack,
Iraq is breaking apart. Eyewitness report from Patrick Cockburn
in Irbil. One of the great
left journalists of his time, he was on the front lines in Korea
and Vietnam. Chris Reed on Wilfred Burchett, the man who made
Murdoch foam at the mouth.Katrina
washes whitest. Bill Quigley in New Orleans reports tales of
lunacy and hope. CounterPunch
Online is read by millions of viewers each month! But remember,
we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition
of CounterPunch. Please
support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter,
which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or
by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions
are tax-deductible.Click
here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please:Subscribe
Now!
In what country will a huge peace coalition
hold an anti-war rally have nothing to say about Iran, Israel
and Palestine or Afghanistan? Is the answer Israel? Turkey?
Micronesia? Sadly it's the USA. On April 29 United for Peace
and Justice is holding a big demonstration in New York City called
"March for Peace, Justice and Democracy". The only
"peace" demand mentioned is bringing troops home from
Iraq.
The silence about Iran is staggering.
On April 9 the Washington Post reported on US military planning
for an attack. In includes this sentence, "Pentagon planners
are studying how to penetrate eight-foot-deep targets and are
contemplating tactical nuclear devices". Contemplating?
We're not talking about mediation here, but dropping "tactical"
Hiroshima-size atomic bombs. And UFPJ has nothing to say.
The conventional wisdom smugly
says this is all a bluff, that with all the losses in Iraq and
sagging polls at home Bush would be crazy to attack Iran. But
Sy Hersh reports [New Yorker April 17, 2006] that a government
consultant with ties to the Pentagon told him " that the
President believes that he must do 'what no Democrat or Republican,
if elected in the future, would have the courage to do,' and
'that saving Iran is going to be his legacy.'" Mission
is part of Bush's "reborn" personality. Remember he
seriously believes that he was chosen by God to be President.
Who is going to stop him?
The non-cooperation of France and Germany of 2003 is a thing
of the past. Russia and China? Can anyone believe that these
money-sotted regimes would put up any opposition to a US full
court press? How about the US Congress? Hersh reports that
the White House briefings of the leadership are underway and
the only questions that are being raised are "How are you
sure you can hit the targets deep enough?" What about the
Democrats? Kerry and Obama tried to win the macho crowd by
claiming in 2004 that Bush wasn't taking a hard enough line on
Iran. They're not about to change their spots now. Lieberman?
He's probably signing his name on the nukes themselves.
The peace movement seems paralyzed
by the charge that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. Never
mind that Scott Ritter, who was dead right about Iraq's WMD,
has said repeatedly in interviews and speeches that Iran has
no nuclear weapons program. [See my Jan. 24 video
interview .] or that the IAEA officials have no evidence
of such a program. Never mind that the US has thousands of nuclear
weapons that could holocaust Iran in minutes. Never mind that
Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons pointed at Tehran.
Oops, I mentioned Israel.
UFPJ doesn't want to say anything about it. Condemn "unending
oil war" and that's the beginning and ending of analysis.
The Christian Zionists who see a Jewish conquest of Palestine
as the start of Aramageddon? They don't really matter. AIPAC,
which draws half the Senate and a third of the House to their
blood-curdling conventions. Not really worth mentioning, not
even the 2006 gathering which was devoted to demands that the
US "take care" of Iran. Bush himself has stated, "We
will use military might to protect our ally Israel", but
why get into that?
And those pesky Palestinians.
Yes, they have their troubles, but why mention them in an anti-war
movement? As if Israeli war-mongering wasn't based on its aparthied-like
oppresson of Palestinians. As if an Israeli official hadn't publicly
said that wiping out Saddam would help Israel impose a new "order"
on the Palestinians. As if the al-Qaeda killers haven't tried
to adopt the Palestinian cause as their own. Bringing up Palestine
in connection with the war will just alienate us from those thousands
and thousands of Israel partisans who are just itching to join
the movement once we get rid of our "anti-Semitism".
Uh-huh.
Unstated in the UFPJ rally
call is a rush to the Democrats. After grassroots activists
pushed the UFPJ and ANSWER coalitions into having one successful
giant demonstration on September 24, 2005, UFPJ passed a resolution
to never work with ANSWER again! Instead it found new allies
with liberal environmental groups, feminists and Jesse Jackson't
PUSH. Jesse Jackson, father confessor to war criminal Clinton,
is going to teach us morality. Grand. Dump all the bleeding
hearts who sympathize with the Arabs and Muslims and the Dems
will pick up votes in the heartland.
Well, in CT this strategy of
pandering to the so-called center has been tried and it's failed.
The Connecticut
Experience
We in Connecticut have had
a statewide umbrella group, Connecticut United for Peace, that
for over three years has run the large statewide demonstrations.
We're members of UFPJ, but years ago we formally decided that
the oppression of Palestinians was intimately tied up with the
war and have mentioned it in all our rallies.
We started making plans for
this year's March 18 rally last November, and we held two ultra-democratc
votes about the demonstration's demands. Anyone who showed up
at the meetings could vote. In November we proposed the slogan
"End Israeli Occupation and Apartheid". We also had
slogans for immigrant rights, opposition to persecution of Muslims
and rejection of war with Iran.
At our final meeting in January
(with 125 in attendance) a number of people demanded a single
issue rally, totally on Iraq, saying by going for the lowest
common denominator we'd get labor, the Democrats and anti-war
Jews. The majority wouldn't go for it. We weren't going to abandon
the immigrants and Muslims and we'd be fools not to mention Iran,
but we figured the real sticking point was Palestine. So we
offered a compromise. Instead of the slogan "End Israeli
Occupation and Apartheid" we offered the vague "Justice
for the Palestinian People".
People voted for the compromise
by a large majority. Still the very notion that the Palestinians
were the victims was too much for some and others were afraid
of offending the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party oriented
labor leaders. So the Israel-apologists, the Peace Council
and some labor leaders went off and did their own thing. They
held a rally on March 19, a day after ours and formed a group
with the acronym COW, Connecticut Opposes War.
On March 18 we marched 20 blocks
from a largely Latino neighborhood and held and rally on the
New Haven Green that according to the AP attracted 1,000. We
think it was larger. Perhaps 10% were Muslim and Palestinians.
We had pro-immigrant speakers in English and Spanish and a section
of the Green with Spanish translators. It was a great demo, but
we had expected double that number to attend and we blame it
largely on the split.
So how well did the splitters
do on the 19th in Hartford? Politically the rally sucked. It
was two blocks from Senator Lieberman's office and none of the
speakers denounced Lieberman. Neither Democrat Ned Lamont who
was challenging Lieberman for anti-war reasons nor Ralph Ferrucci
who was running as a Green were invited to speak. The only chant
was this embarrasing bleat,"We are Americans, This is Our
Country". Imagine after three years of the war they still
think we have to defend our patriotism? All the speeches denounced
one person and one person only, George Bush. As if the Democrats
hadn't pushed for the war enthusiastically and as if they weren't
still supporting it. Iran was mentioned in one sentence. And,
of course, they didn't say a word about Israel's constant pressure
for war against Iraq and Iran or the fact that Gaza is now without
flour.
But the bottom line is numbers.
Did they draw out the "silent majority"? No. Their
rally was about the same size as ours (and included many of our
people). It was hardly the breakthough that COW was predicting.
There were a dozen Democratic state legislators. As for labor,
state AFL-CIO President John Olsen spoke and there was a sizeable
presence by SEIU-1199, maybe 50 or so union officials and members.
That was about it.. Organized Jewish presence was invisible.
No one saw a single sign from a Jewish organization and only
one person objected to the tons of pro-Palestinian rights literature
we gave out. On the other hand whatever was gained from the
"middle" was lost from the fact the Muslims were conspicuous
by their absence.
The COW strategy is a model
for what shouldn't be attempted on April 29th..
We have three weeks. Something
has to be done to change the political direction of UFPJ. Ignoring
Iran is maddness. Abandoning Muslims and Palestinians is disgraceful.
Silence about Israel is inexcusable. We need to pressure the
out of touch UFPJ leadership. We need public statements, petitions
and a ton of emails to the UFPJ steering committee at their address
<>ufpj-sc@unitedforpeace.org Tell them to change the demands
and to get speakers who'll talk about all the realities of the
war.
Stanley Heller is chairperson of the Middle East
Crisis Committee and host of its weekly TV news program that
can be seen on the internet www.TheStruggle.org.
He is a member of the organizing committee of Connecticut
United for Peace. He can be reached at mail@thestruggle.org
Now
Available
from CounterPunch Books!
The Case
Against Israel
By Michael Neumann
CounterPunch
Speakers Bureau Sick of sit-on-the-Fence speakers, tongue-tied and timid?
CounterPunch Editors Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair
are available to speak forcefully on ALL the burning issues,
as are other CounterPunchers seasoned in stump oratory. Call
CounterPunch Speakers Bureau, 1-800-840-3683. Or email beckyg@counterpunch.org.