What
You're Missing in our subscriber-only CounterPunch newsletter
THE INSIDE HISTORY OF THE ISRAEL
LOBBY
Former top
CIA analysts Kathleen and Bill Christison give CounterPunchers
the real scoop on the Israel lobby and precisely how powerful
it is. Read
how US presidents from Wilson, through FDR to Truman were manipulated
by the Zionist lobby; how Israel bent LBJ, Reagan and Clinton
to its purpose; how Bush's White House has been the West Wing
of the Israeli government; how Washington's revolving doors send
full-time Israel lobbyists from think-tanks to the National Security
Council and the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans. For all who want a
true measure of the Lobby's power, the Christisons' 8-page dossier,
exclusive to CounterPunch newsletter subscribers, is a MUST read. CounterPunch
Online is read by millions of viewers each month! But remember,
we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition
of CounterPunch. Please support this
website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains
fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation
for the online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible.Click
here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please:Subscribe
Now!
Population Transfers,
Land Theft and Bankrupt Ghettos
Palestine:
It's All Over
By ALEXANDER COCKBURN
The first item I ever wrote about Palestinians
was around 1973, when I was just starting a press column for
a New York weekly called the Village Voice. It concerned a story
in the New York Times about a "retaliatory" raid by
the Israeli air force, after a couple of Al Fatah guerillas had
fired on an IDF unit. I'm not sure whether there any fatalities.
The planes flew north and dumped high explosive on a refugee
camp in Lebanon, killing a dozen or so men, women and children.
I wrote a little commentary,
noting the usual lack of moral disquiet in the Times' story about
this lethal retaliation inflicted on innocent refugees. Dan Wolf,
the Voice's editor, called me in and suggested I might want to
reconsider. I think, that first time, the item got dropped. But
Dan's unwonted act of censorship riled me and I started writing
a fair amount about the lot of the Palestinians.
These were the days when Palestinians
carried far less news value for editors than Furbish's lousewort,
and no politician ever held that this beleagured plant didn't
actually exist as a species, which is what Golda Meir, Israel's
prime minister said of Palestinians.
Back then you had to dig a
little harder to excavate what Jewish Israelis were actually
doing to Palestinians. Lay out the facts about institutionalized
racism, land confiscations, torture and a hail of abuse would
pour through the mailbox, as when I published a long interview
in the Voice in 1980 with the late Israel Shahak, the intrepid
professor from Hebrew University.
It's slightly eerie now to
look at what Shahak was saying back then and at the accuracy
of his analysis and predictions: "The basic trends were
established in '74 and '75, including settler organizations,
mystical ideology, and the great financial support of the United
States to Israel. Between summer '74 and summer '75 the key decisions
were taken, and from that time it's a straight line." Among
these decisions, said Shahak, was "to keep the occupied
territories of Palestine," a detailed development of much
older designs consummated in 1967.
Gradually, through the 1980s,
very often in the translations from the Hebrew language press
that Shahak used to send, the contours of the Israeli plan emerged,
like the keel and ribs and timbers of an old ship: a road system
that would bypass Palestinian towns and villages and link the
Jewish settlements and military posts; ever-expanding clusters
of settlements; a master plan for control of the whole region's
water.
It wasn't hard to get vivid
descriptions of the increasingly intolerable conditions of life
for Palestinians: the torture of prisoners, the barriers to the
simplest trip, the harassment of farmers and school children,
the house demolitions. Plenty of people came back from Israel
and the territories with harrowing accounts, though few ever
made the journey into a major newspaper or onto national tv.
And even in the testimonies
that did get published here, what was missing was any acknowledgement
of the long-term plan to wipe the record clean of all troublesome
U.N. resolutions, crush Palestinian national aspirations, steal
their land and water, cram them into ever smaller enclaves, ultimately
balkanize them with the Wall, which was on the drawing board
many years ago. Indeed to write about any sort of master plan
was to incur further torrents of abuse for one's supposedly "paranoid"
fantasies about Israel' bad faith, with much pious invocation
of the "peace process".
But successive Israeli governments
did have a long-term plan. No matter who was in power, the roads
got built, the water stolen, the olive and fruit trees cut down
(a million) the houses knocked over (12,000), the settlements
imposed (300) the shameless protestations of good faith issued
to the US press (beyond computation).
As the new millennium shambled
forward, surely it became impossible to believe any Israeli claim
to be bargaining, or even to wish to bargain in good faith. By
now the "facts of the ground" in Israel and the territories
were as sharply in focus as one of Dali's surrealist paintings.
In May of this year the Israeli
prime minister, Ehud Olmert, comes to Washington and addresses
a joint session of Congress in which he declares: "I believed,
and to this day still believe, in our people's eternal and historic
right to this entire land." In other words he doesn't recognize
the right of Palestinians to even the wretched cantons currently
envisaged in his "realignment". Why should Hamas believe
a syllable of Olmert's poppycock? When Arafat and the PLO gave
worrisome signs of being eager for an accommodation Israel's
reply was to invade Lebanon.
In Olmert's "realignment
plan the "Separation Barrier," now scheduled to be
Israel's permanent "demographic border," annexes
10 per cent of the West Bank, while melding into Israel vast
settlements and half a million settlers. The Palestinians lose
their best agricultural land and the water. Israel's greater
Jerusalem finishes off all possible viability for a viable, separate
Palestinian state. This Palestinian mini-archipelago of cantons
is shuttered to the east by Israel's security border in the Jordan
Valley.
The press here, timid and ignorant,
greets Olmert's "realignment" with tranquil respect.
In the meantime a frightful historical tragedy is in its final
chapters. With the connivance of what is sometimes laughably
referred to as the "world community"--notably the US
and EU, Israel is deliberately starving Palestinians into submission
as the reward for having democratically elected the party of
their choice. Whole communities are on the edge of starvation,
cut off by Israel from food and medicines. The World Bank predicts
a poverty rate of over 67 percent later this year. A UN Report
issued in Geneva on May 30 says that four out of 10 Palestinians
in the territories live under the official poverty line of less
than $2.10 a day. The ILO estimates the jobless rate to be 40.7
percent of the Palestinian labor force.
The end of the story? I'd say
the basic strategy is what it was in 1948: population transfer,
to be achieved by making life so awful for Palestinians that
most of them will depart, leaving a few bankrupt ghettoes behind
as memorials to all those foolish hopes of a sovereign Palestinian
state.
Footnote: A shorter version
of this column ran in the print edition of The Nation that went
to press last Wednesday.
Now
Available
from CounterPunch Books!
The Case
Against Israel
By Michael Neumann
CounterPunch
Speakers Bureau Sick of sit-on-the-Fence speakers, tongue-tied and timid?
CounterPunch Editors Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair
are available to speak forcefully on ALL the burning issues,
as are other CounterPunchers seasoned in stump oratory. Call
CounterPunch Speakers Bureau, 1-800-840-3683. Or email beckyg@counterpunch.org.