Amazon.com: Blood on the Border : A Memoir of the Contra War: Books: Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz

Average Customer Review:

Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Casts a Light on Indigenous Politics, June 20, 2006

Reviewer:

John Green (Hayward CA USA) - See all my reviews

"US officials railed against the Sandinistas for nationalizing property, but they had never criticized the dictator Somoza for personally owning much of the country..."

Blood on the Border is Roxanne Dunbar-Oritz's maddening search for identity amidst the life-or-death Sandinista Revolution and collapsing social movements in the U.S. during the Ronald Reagan `80s.

As a witness to many great crimes against humanity, the author deftly balances between her own struggles with alcohol, humanizing the Nicaraguan people (especially the misunderstood and maligned indigenous Miskitu people) and recounting harrowing run-ins with "the other side" in the form of CIA agents, State Department officials, mercenary guns-for-hire, Christian fundamentalists and Somozistas.

This is a well-written, important contribution to the history of the Sandinista Revolution and the U.S. Left in the 1980s. Specifically, its unique focus on the role of indigenous people in a wider social revolution is invaluable. The misunderstandings with the Sadinistatas and manipulation of the Miskitu and other Atlantic Coast Indians by the U.S./Contras is telling of the present war on Iraq's ethnic conflict.

The author's post-Maoist politics shine through her actions--including her obsession with the United Nations--and leads one to wonder if her tremendous knowledge, talents and convictions might have been more helpful had they not brought her to UN conference after conference?

The better we understand Nicaragua and the United States' dirty war against the Sandinistas, the better we will be poised to confront today's imperialism. After all, the author observes, from then-U.S. Ambassador to Honduras John Negroponte to then-Reagan advisor Donald Rumsfeld, it's a lot of the same cretins running the show today.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

great for the college classroom, May 31, 2006

Reviewer:

Sam (Ca) - See all my reviews

I used this book for my U.S. history course on American Foreign Policy. I loved the book, but more importantly my students enjoyed it. It was a great source for debate within the class. I used it in conjunction with Smedly Butlers "War is a Racket" These two books gave the class a different perspective on U.S. intervention. The importance is that Blood on the Border puts a human toll on U.S. action abroad. Great book for the classroom if you are a teacher and you want to stir critical thinking in your students this is the book for you

7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

Radical Okie does it again!, December 11, 2005

Reviewer:

Davis D. Joyce (Spavinaw, Oklahoma) - See all my reviews

Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz has a remarkable ability to tell her personal story in a broader historical context--the mark, I suppose, of a good memoir. This is her third such volume. The first, RED DIRT: GROWING UP OKIE, is still my favorite, but that may just be in part because I have the experience of trying to be a radical in Oklahoma. That book traces her life from poor, part Native American roots to 60s radicalism (including wonderful stories about her Wobbly--IWW, International Workers of the World--grandfather. The second volume, OUTLAW WOMAN: A MEMOIR OF THE WAR YEARS, 1960-1975, focused on Dunbar-Ortiz's involvement in the anti-Vietnam War movement and the feminist movement.
Now, she has completed the series (but not, hopefully, the peace and justice work she so obviously passionately believes in) with BLOOD ON THE BORDER: A MEMOIR OF THE CONTRA WAR. Dunbar-Ortiz is brutally honest about the problems in her life, including relationships and alcoholism. She is also brutally honest about the role of US imperialism in Latin America. Just one of the revelations for me was the recycling of figures from this era such as Negroponte by the current Bush. This is a very interesting, even important book. Read it. And weep? For Dunbar-Ortiz sounds a bit pessimistic at the end, one might say. "Nicaragua was the last great hope for national liberation movements to succeed in breaking free from imperialism," she writes. But she continues (and concludes the book): "The historical process of nation building that occcurred with the rise of capitalism in Western Europe has reached its limits. Had the West, particularly the United States, nourished the struggles of peoples for the development of authentically independent nations out of the ruins of colonialism in Africa and imperialism in Asia, the Pacific, Latin America, and the Caribbean, perhaps the dream of a United Nations could have become a reality. Today, that dream does not appear possible, making indigenous movements ever more fundamental to humanity in reaching a different conclusion than a nuclear war or environmental disaster." Is there hope there? I hope so....

3 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

A Little Loose with the Facts, December 7, 2005

Reviewer:

Verne Miller (Kansas City) - See all my reviews

Ward Churchill "signed on" to an attempt to discredit Dunbar Ortiz on the basis of her ethnicity? This seems a bit peculiar, given that he's on record as having rather staunchly defended her against attacks on those very grounds by, among others, the Indian Law Resource Center's Steven Tullburg, Wicazo Review's Elizabeth Cook-Lynne, Indian Country Today's Tim Giago, and the inimitable Vernon Bellecourt of "National AIM."

I've gone through everything I can find on this, and have come up with no indication that Churchill ever "signed on" to antything at all in this regard. If Dunbar Ortiz were going to say that he did, and/or Ron Jacobs repeat her statement as fact in his glowing review of her book, it would've been nice if one, the other, or both had bothered to be specific as to where Churchill made his supposed mark.

Alternatively, we have reason to question the accuracy of the "facts" Dunbar Ortiz elects to deploy, and to wonder whether and to what extent she's elected to use her memoirs as a vehicle upon which to continue these ancient secterian squabbles in yet another form (a type of factual impairment with which Jacobs' own history of Weather is much impaired).

News flash, folks: Neither Dunbar Ortiz or Jacobs is doing anyone a favor by playing these games.

6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:

Contra-indications, November 28, 2005

Reviewer:

R. Jacobs "Ron Jacobs" (Asheville, NC USA) - See all my reviews

A Review of Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz's Blood on the Border
Contraindications

By RON JACOBS

To many of us in the United States, the US contra war against the Nicaraguan government in the 1980s seems like very long ago. Since the CIA-manufactured defeat of the revolutionary government in Managua--a defeat that included mercenary war, media manipulations, CIA and Special Forces covert ops, drug-running and arms smuggling by people paid by the US government, and a sham election staged by Washington--the US has militarily invaded Iraq twice, Yugoslavia, and Afghanistan. A mere three months before that sham election, Washington invaded and overthrew the Panamanian government as if warning Nicaraguans what was in store for them should they vote against the US-sponsored candidates. In addition, Washington has instigated and assisted regime change in El Salvador, several countries in the former Soviet Bloc, and a few nations in Latin America, to name just a few regions of the world that come immediately to mind. Besides these "successes", Washington has failed to overthrow the Bolivarian government in Venezuela or the governments of its eternal enemies--Cuba and northern Korea. One can be certain, however, that these attempts are ongoing. On top of all this, Washington has forced so-called free trade agreements on most countries around the world, especially those in what global capitalists like to call the developing word. These agreements are designed, of course, to maintain Washington and Wall Street's neocolonial hold.

Given all of this, it is good to see Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz's latest effort Blood on the Border hit the bookstores. Her memoir of her experience as a leftist indigenous activist during the contra wars in Nicaragua is not only a well-told tale of those times, it is a primer on US intentions in the 21st century. Expansion and control, by whatever means necessary. The manipulation of local distrusts, both ethnic and religious; and the transformation of those mistrusts into armed conflict. All with the only real beneficiary being the economic and political masters in Washington.

Dunbar-Ortiz places the struggle of the Miskito people on Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast firmly in the greater context of the struggles of all the western hemisphere's indigenous nations to determine their own destinies and maintain their own cultures and ways of life. As she details in Blood on the Border, her acknowledgment of her own native heritage and its relationship to her involvement in leftist revolutionary movements in the United States during the 1960s and 1970s put her in a unique position to understand the situation faced by both sides in the debate in Nicaragua between the revolutionary Sandinista government and the indigenous nations within Nicaragua's borders. In addition, her role lobbying various United Nations commissions dealing with indigenous issues gave her a mobility and a degree of independence that enabled her to hear from many sides of the debate. This information then allowed her to use her understanding of imperialism to work for a solution that would benefit the people in the regions where she was working, not those in Washington, DC or, sometimes, those in Managua.

Part history text and part personal narrative, Blood on the Border briefly discusses the history of US intervention in Nicaragua, always reminding the reader that Washington never cared about the people of Nicaragua, no matter what their ethnicity. Likewise, Dunbar-Ortiz's historical summary of Washington's relations with its own indigenous peoples makes a similar point. The role of Christian missionaries in creating the cultural climate for US imperial rule is also discussed, especially in relation to the Miskito peoples, who were "Christianized" by the Moravian Church. This relationship would, like so many other places where a Christian church has left its mark, work against the Sandinista (and in favor of Washington) in their attempts to work out some kind of agreement for Miskito autonomy.

Unfortunately, Dunbar-Ortiz was, along with the Sandinistas, up against the forces of the US military machine--a machine reinvigorated by the rise to power of the most hawkish wing of the US establishment. This wing, represented by Ronald Reagan on television and Ollie North in the field, was determined to defeat the popular revolutions of 1980s Central America. Their determination would put them on a path that eventually involved running cocaine into Los Angeles neighborhoods, missile parts through Israel to Iran in trade for US hostages being held by various militant cells in Lebanon, and cold cash back to the mercenary armies being trained and controlled by various members of the US State department, Defense Department, and intelligence agencies. Back home in the States, these mercenaries were recruited by various members of the indigenous rights movement who had been convinced by the CIA propaganda that the Sandinistas were a worse enemy of indigenous nations in the Americas than the US Cavalry. Of course, the money some of these so-called representatives received from CIA front groups (like Reverend Moon's, Unification Church) helped in the convincing, as well.

Dunbar-Ortiz writes about this aspect of the US contra war, too. She details the attempts by various elements of the American Indian Movement (AIM) to discredit her by repeating propaganda contrived in the CIA counterintelligence offices or just by calling her a leftist. Other attempts, including one signed on to (rather ironically) by Ward Churchill that called into question her "Indianness," and another by Nation writer Penny Lernoux that attacked the Sandinistas with as much vehemence as Ronald Reagan ever mustered, kept her in a state of regular re-examination. This would usually express itself in excessive alcohol consumption--a demon with which Dunbar-Ortiz had battled before.

As a person who attended multiple protests, a few sit-ins, and numerous meetings opposing the contra war in Nicaragua, I found Blood on the Border a revealing report on what was occurring on a completely different level of the movement against US imperialism. While I was attending meetings at La Pena in Berkeley or at a public library in Olympia, WA, Ortiz was riding canoes upriver in the Miskito nation. While she met with human rights activists in Geneva or Managua, I was sitting in at the Federal Building in Seattle. The struggle that hundreds of thousands of people were involved in around the world was waged on multiple levels and all of them complemented the other, even when we weren't aware of that fact.

While reading Blood on the Border, I was alternately reminded of the whiskey priest in revolutionary Mexico from Graham Greene's novel The Power and the Glory and his CIA man Pyle in The Quiet American. This isn't because the author was reminiscent of either one of these characters, but because they represent what she was up against. Occasionally depressing, but never hopeless; instructional, but never tedious; Blood on the Border is further proof from the pen of Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz that memoir can be more than navel-gazing and self-flattery. In this instance it is history and political education.

Ron Jacobs is author of The Way the Wind Blew: a history of the Weather Underground.

6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

fighting (against) the contra war, November 25, 2005

Reviewer:

Baron L. Pineda (Oberlin, OH, USA) - See all my reviews

Rarely does the personal and the political blend so seamlessly as Roxanne Dunbar Ortiz recounts her tireless efforts to oppose US imperialism during and after Nicaragua's Contra War of the 1980s. Along the way she introduces a fascinating cast of characters that range from Rigoberta Mench�, Bella Abzug and Bianca Jagger to Oliver North and the Moonies. Dunbar Ortiz's life and work in this period foreshadow today's struggles over issues as diverse as terrorism, governmental press manipulation, engaged scholarship, activism, alcoholism and even identity politics. This captivating blend of personal memoir and political/intellectual history could not be more timely.

Rate this item to improve your recommendations

Start a new discussion