www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Hillary for President?

There really is no way of getting around it. Sen. Hillary Clinton may well be future presidential material. From Manhattan to Hollywood, Hillary Clinton is pocketing enormous amounts of cash for her re-election campaign. Yet Hillary is facing what seems to be fierce opposition from within her own party, as well as from third parties here in New York. The main reason candidates have signed up to challenge Hillary is her position, er, non-position on the disgraceful “war on terror.”

Hillary, in a letter to constituents last November, expressed her belief that the war in Iraq shouldn’t be “open-ended,” but was clear that she would never “pull out of Iraq immediately.” She wrote that she wouldn’t accept any timetable for withdrawal and won’t even embrace a “redeployment” of U.S. troops along the lines of Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.).

“I take responsibility for my vote, and I, along with a majority of Americans, expect the president and his administration to take responsibility for the false assurances, faulty evidence and mismanagement of the war,” Clinton wrote in her lengthy letter that amounted to nothing short of denial for her own culpability in the mess.

Continue reading "Hillary for President?" »

Song of the Week

For those that followed this blog over the past week, you'll know I was pretty upset about the great band Sleater-Kinney breaking up. But in the wake of disappointment there is often hope, and in this case, rebirth.

A fantastic band, of which I've been a huge fan over the past few years, has reunited after taking a two year hiatus. Here's a new song by the Green Circles titled "The Water and the Wave". It's a demo, so feel lucky I got my hands on it!

--Joshua Frank

The Democrats’ Election Year Stunts

A Neutering in Full Stride

You know you are either getting somewhere or losing ground fast when the Democrats begin to exploit your slogans during an election year. Howard Dean, the Democratic National Committee chair, last weekend plugged the necessity of pulling troops out of Iraq by year's end. But his plea couldn't carry less weight – for his party doesn't agree with the doc.

"The Republicans don't have a plan," Dean said in his party's weekly radio address. "'Stay the course' is not a plan. Saying the problems in Iraq will be left to the next president, is not a plan. … We believe that we ought to focus on training, logistics, and counterterrorism, and we can do that with a redeployment of our troops."

It took a while for Howard Dean and a few other Democrats to come around to Rep. John Murtha's call to redeploy troops throughout the region. Yet, even though Dean complains that the Republicans don't have a plan to pull out troops, he fails to address the reality that the Democrats still don't have one either. In fact, most of Dean's colleagues have yet to embrace Murtha's call, as the failed bills in the Senate proved last week. In a round of embarrassing votes, the Democrats heartily embraced Bush's prolonged occupation.

In the first set of tallies, the Democrats overwhelming opposed a timetable for withdrawal, shooting down John Kerry's lethargic proposal to get troops out by July 2007. In the second, even less significant request, Democrats folded again and failed to adopt a plan for redeployment of U.S. armed forces from Iraq.

A broken party, like that of the Democrats, will never be able to challenge the stubbornness of the Republican establishment, which is nearly unwavering in its call for more war and occupation.

Here in New York, Jonathan Tasini is gaining support among a large majority of antiwar Democrats, garnering praise from The New York Times to Amy Goodman's popular Democracy Now! But as eyes turn toward Tasini's anti-Hillary campaign, the majority of antiwar New Yorkers are ignoring the largest third-party challenge to Sen. Clinton's war agenda, and it's hurting the movement that was finally taking shape. Howie Hawkins, who is running on the Green Party line, has been virtually ignored by the mainstream and even independent press. Hawkins is planning on challenging Clinton all the way up to Election Day, while Tasini's campaign will come to a screeching halt after the primary election.

Tasini's bid is indicative of what's so utterly wrong with the Democratic Party and those who believe they can make change by working within its ranks. Any glimmer of hope siphons dissent: Hope of getting Democrats to "redeploy" siphons dissent. Hope they can mount an internal battle against war hawks like Clinton siphons dissent. The Democrats in general, siphon dissent.

And that is exactly what party brass in Washington desire. They hope the antiwar movement will see the recent attempts to espouse a consistent stance against the war as a sign that the tides are changing. But the tides aren't changing. Nor is the direction of the Democratic Party or this war, no matter what Howard Dean, John Kerry, or Jonathan Tasini may have us believe.

--Joshua Frank

Net Democracy Not Upheld

Get ready for internet toll roads.

--Joshua Frank

America Says Thank You?

Well, I'm an American and I sure as shit don't say "thanks". I say fuck you and your illegal murdering wars. This awful ad is airing on Fox News next month. And MTV won't run antiwar ads? Good God.

--Joshua Frank

Sleater-Kinney: Entertain (Live)

They'll be missed.

--Joshua Frank

Sleater-Kinney Call it Quits

This pretty much sucks. Honestly, I am devastated. But we were lucky to have them rockin' out as long as we did.

--Joshua Frank

CU Set to Fire Ward Churchill

He says he'll sue if they do. And I wouldn't be surprised if others resign in protest.

--Joshua Frank

Tre Arrow and Earth Liberation Front

Radical Environmentalism on Death Row?

The government drops bombs on kids in the Middle East, while a hand full of activists allegedly torch some yuppie ski resort in Colorado: Bush gets reelected and the radical environmentalists are issued warrants. Where the hell is the justice?

On Friday January 20, eleven environmentalists accused of acting on behalf of the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), were named in a 65-count Federal indictment that included numerous charges of arson and destruction of an energy facility. The events described in the indictments took place in Oregon, Washington, Wyoming, California and Colorado. The FBI had supposedly infiltrated them.

"The indictment tells a story of four-and-a-half years of arson, vandalism, violence and destruction claimed to have been executed on behalf of the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front -- extremist movements known to support acts of domestic terrorism," Attorney General Alberto said in a news conference.

There you have it: Environmentalists willing to embrace such direct action tactics to combat the destruction of the wild are now labeled domestic terrorists by the US government, even though no humans were targeted or injured in any of the aforementioned arsons. There were only economic casualties covered in ash, ranging upwards of $100 million according to the Justice Department.

One could argue the strength of such illegal direct action. Maybe it's effective. Maybe it's not. But according to those who defend such acts, it's all about confronting violence with violence while inflicting as much economic damage as one can along the way. Such goals, as loose as they may be (ELF doesn't have any formal organization), have helped propel the obscure group up to numero uno on the domestic terror list here in the US.

The most notorious of the suspected eco-terrorists, Tre Arrow, formerly Michael James Scarpitti, currently resides in a Vancouver Island Correction Center in Canada where he is fighting extradition to the United States. Tre stands accused of orchestrating two arson attacks that took place in Oregon in 2001 -- one involving a cement mixer and another concerning the firebombing of two logging vehicles. Arrow claims he is innocent on both counts.

In an interview with Portland, Oregon's weekly alternative, Willamette Week, in January 2005, Tre was asked if he had ever been involved with the ELF, to which he responded:

"I emphatically express that I am not involved in the ELF and never have been. And at the same time, I don't condemn the activists that are involved in the ELF for the actions they engage in. ... [People who know me] know I don't burn anything. The ELF, it has its place. I recognize it does have an impact. It's very telling that the FBI regards the ELF as a bigger threat than the white supremacist groups."

I am not so certain Arrow is innocent of all the charges brought against him. I went to college with the three individuals who turned on Arrow, claiming the ex-Green Party candidate for US Congress, was the brains behind the attack on logging equipment near Eagle Creek, Oregon in June, 2001. One of those activists, Jake Sherman, who is still in prison for the arson, worked side by side with me on the Ralph Nader for President campaign back in 2000.

I can say without a doubt that Jake would have done most anything Tre Arrow told him to. Like so many other dim-witted environmentalists in Oregon during the late 1990s, Sherman looked to Tre as a modern day prophet. But Tre was no messiah -- he was just a media hungry environmentalist who longed for the heat of the spotlight. Not too unlike Julia "Butterfly" Hill who made her nest for two years in that giant redwood in California.

Undoubtedly, Arrow has done some good. In July of 2000, the agile Tre scaled the wall of a U.S. Forest Service Regional Headquarters in downtown Portland, Oregon where he remained perched for 11 straight days in protest of the forest service sales that were taking place in Eagle Creek, which is home to several endangered species and provides drinking water for tens of thousands of Oregonians. Two years later the Forest Service cancelled the sale, saving almost 70% of the proposed cuts. Tre had helped cast Eagle Creek in the national news.

But is Tre Arrow still an eco-warrior? I am not convinced. Although he half-heartily defends the actions of the ELF, he is quite careful to distance himself from their tactics. Like "Butterfly" did when she left her beloved Luna, Tre too descended from his lofty ledge on the Federal building straight into enviro sainthood. Rolling Stone Magazine later dubbed him an "Environmental Rock Star." He received fan mail from all over the world. Radio interviews and indy-media praise. But Tre Arrow is no Mick Jagger. He's now just one more touchy-feely green who taints the radical environmental movement with his spiritual longing to be one with nature. As if the face of a Grizzly Bear and the Grey Wolf weren't enough to motive us. Now we have Tre Arrow's mug shot to guide us onward.

There was a moment when Tre and others made a convincing case that environmentalism was more than petitioning, changing by-laws and running losing campaigns for Congress. He seemed to understand that in order to protect the wild, forest activists must be willing to take risks. Spike trees. Block logging roads and lie down for the cause. But as Tre proclaims his innocence, he has simultaneously turned his back on the spirit of Ed Abbey and the early days of Earth First!.

Tre could have been a martyr, defending such actions as a just retaliation to the destruction of nature. Much like members of the Weather Underground have. He could have told us all why he did what he did.

Let's just hope one of the eleven activists recently named in the eco-sabotage ring do just such a thing if they indeed are guilty as charged. Then maybe, just maybe, I'd be willing to believe militant environmentalism isn't yet dead.

--Joshua Frank

The Devil and the Candidate

Congressional hopeful in Utah blames campaign woes on Satan.

--Joshua Frank

Masters of War

William J. Perry, Sec. of Defense under Bill Clinton (and former director of contractor Electronic Defense Labs), and his former assistant Sec. of Defense, Ashton Carter (formerly an advisor to Kerry in '04) have fully endorsed Bush's preemptive war doctrine in their op-ed in yesterday's Washington Post.  Says they:

"Should the United States allow a country openly hostile to it and armed with nuclear weapons to perfect an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of delivering nuclear weapons to U.S. soil? We believe not."

and:

"The Bush administration has unwisely ballyhooed the doctrine of "preemption," which all previous presidents have sustained as an option rather than a dogma... but intervening before mortal threats to U.S. security can develop is surely a prudent policy." 

Carter and Perry are calling for the United States to destroy the North Korean Taepodong missile- good lord, the Strangelovian/Freudian significance of that is wayyy too obvious for Kim Jong Il to have not seen the movie before naming the rocket - by:

"a cruise missile launched from a submarine carrying a high-explosive warhead. The blast would be similar to the one that killed terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in Iraq."

The significance of this statement, coming from two Democrats, goes beyond the Korean peninsula.  North Korea is a small-time bit player in the larger Asian arena, and the target of this saber-rattling from the US is to an extent China, but of course also Iran and any moderate-sized power that has the ability to acquire nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.  Currently, the only powers with ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons that could threaten the US mainland are Russia and some ex-Soviet republics -- China, France, and the UK. These are all Great Powers or were formerly attached to a Great Power, and are thus allowed to have the weaponry.  A minor-level power like North Korea or Iran acquiring nuclear weaponry and ballistic missiles creates a situation whereby the US ability to strike with impunity into the periphery against small powers is suddenly threatened.  This, obviously, is looked on with dread by the US establishment. 

Let's also not forget that the atomic technology was given to North Korea by Dr. A.Q. Khan, the Pakistani scientist, who was allowed to run an atomic flea-market because he had monetary ties to the Saudis and because the US government is a vehement supporter of the Musharraf military dictatorship.  Thus, Perry and Carter do not call for a military strike against Pakistan to destroy their nuclear facilities, even though they were the originators of nuclear proliferation to Korea and Libya *and* Pakistan's establishment is filled with hard-core fundamentalist Islamists who would like to see the Western infidels crushed (sounds like an openly hostile power to me). None of this is particularly eyebrow raising in these times, but the depths to which policy creators on both sides of the coin wish to stoop to further cover the world in perpetual warfare does continue to stun.

--Peter LaVenia

Weekend Talk on Hillary Clinton

For those in the New York City area, I'll be talking on Saturday at "Socialism 2006: Build the Left, Fight the Right". Click here for more info. Hope you can make it out, should be fun.

--Joshua Frank

Armed Madhouse

Greg Palast was here in Albany yesterday (unfortunately being interviewed by the winner of the pompous windbag award, Alan Chartock) and I managed to see him speak about his new book, Armed Madhouse. I highly suggest picking it up - Greg takes on sacred cows of the new New Left like peak oil as well as voting reform, terrorism, etc. with his usual brand of investigative reporting.  BTW, he's not copyrighting the book, so you can post whatever you want of it online.

--Peter LaVenia

Democrats Split on Iraq Exit

The votes today in the Senate show just how divided the Democratic Party is on the occupation of Iraq. Forget an "out now" position, these nimrods can't even set a time table for a future withdrawal, let alone redeployment. Two weak amendments were defeated. And they think they deserve our votes.

Fools, I say. Fools.

--Joshua Frank

Bonnaroo Report

Hey folks, just got back from Bonnaroo and am in the process of recovering from an amazing few days.  There's so much to write about, so I'll try giving a short capsule of my time there for those of you not fortunate enough to be amongst the 80,000 in Manchester, TN from June 15-18. 

The Bands:  Good lord, where do I start?  There was a delectable mixture of everything from indie rock to reggae, jam bands, rap, Brazilian folk music - whatever you wanted to find, you could over the course of the weekend.  The festival was set up to have multiple acts performing at the same time during the day, so choices had to be made (Stephen Malkmus or Matisyahu?), but for the headliners (Tom Petty, Radiohead, Phil Lesh & Friends) every evening there were no competing acts - a good choice in terms of creating a communal atmosphere.  It's hard to pin down favorites but I'd say that the best shows were put on by Beck, Elvis Costello and Allan Toussaint (who sang the most political songs of the festival, about New Orleans, of course), Ivan Neville's Dumpstaphunk, Bright Eyes, and Clap Your Hands Say Yeah. 

At one point during his set Beck came out in a bear costume and started rapping - I'm not sure if this is standard form for Beck but it was weirdly cool.  Beck also did a late night "superjam" with Trey Anastasio on Saturday night. Tom Petty brought Stevie Nicks out during his set (I'm sure most of my fellow 20-somethings there had no idea she was in Fleetwood Mac), but Tom himself seemed superbly high.  No matter - he covered a Travelling Wilburies song and some Yardbirds so we didn't just hear the selection of jukebox Petty hits we're used to (though I enjoyed it all).  Radiohead was, well, Radiohead - I'm not a huge fan of their airy electronica stuff but it was cool to see. 

Festival setup & maintenance - the crew at Bonnaroo know what they're doing - there were no glitches. If you like festivals this one actually has clean portapotties... you know what I mean when I say they can get nasty at festival events. The sponsors were inconspicuous and forced to provide a free service - there was free broadband internet and a movie tent (provided by Dolby). Plus Microsoft chipped in to help bring us an arcade with old 80s video game machines (Galaga or Joust, anyone?)  I liked the touch of having a microbrew tent so I could drink actual beer instead of Bud and Pabst.  And, of course, the running water helped keep us all cool.

Other cool stuff - the Silent Disco - a DJ was spinning every night and you had to wear headphones in the tent to here 'em - making for a weird effect.  The Preservation Hall tent with the PH Jazz band - a great idea and a place to hang out for awhile and take in some New Orleans feeling (well, what it used to be anyway).  The playground and the huge fountain, plus the life-size art were all interesting. 

Other weird observations - I wore my Mets hat all weekend, but I swear that the festival was overrun by Mets fans. Are we just more of the festival-going type than Yankee or BoSox fans?  Also, as the festival is essentially a large zone where drug laws don't apply, I saw lots of illicit usage - but why did people literally smoke a bowl on the toilet?  Can't they wait?  Weird. 

Anyway, if any of you dear readers get a chance next year, I'd suggest looking into going to Bonnaroo 2007 and having some fun.

--Peter LaVenia

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Tracker

  • Site Meter