www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

March 13, 2004

Search:

SUBSCRIBE    NEWSLETTERS    NETSEMINARS    RESEARCH   
crn.com
 Home
 Breaking News
 This Week's CRN
 CRN Test Center
 Special Reports
 Broadcast News
 Top 25 Executives
 Industry Hall of Fame
 Columns
research
 Research Home
 25 Rising Stars
 Salary Survey
 Certification Study
 Channel Champions
 Customer Services
 Renew
 International Subs
 Back Issues
 Meet the Editors
 Tip off ShadowRam
 Editorial Calendar
 Privacy Statement
 Media Kit
 Press Kit
 CRN Sales Contacts
 Strategy Guides
 International
 Discussions
 Vendors Directory
 Career Center
 Sourcing Center
 Tools
 Resources
 Research
 How To Advertise
 XChange Conferences
 IPED
 Digital Connect
 Tech Builder



Microsoft Vows To Fight IE Patent-Infingement Verdict

E-mail this article E-mail this article
Print this article Print this article
E-mail this article Link/reprint this article
HOT LINKS
ARROW Jury Orders Microsoft To Pay $520 Million
Breaking News
ARROW European Regulators Object To Oracle's PeopleSoft Bid
ARROW SQL Server Delays Roil Solution Providers
ARROW Microsoft Hotmail, MSN Outages Reported
ARROW Enterprise Spending On the Upswing
ARROW MCI Cleanup Of WorldCom Books Finds Billions In Losses
ARROW Microsoft Trademark Tussle Squeezes Lindows Out Of Benelux
ARROW EMC, Fujitsu Siemens Extend Strategic Alliance
ARROW Macromedia Fixes Dreamweaver Performance Problems
By Paula Rooney, CRN

11:46 AM EST Tues., Aug. 12, 2003

Microsoft--a stalwart supporter of SCO's IP infringement claims against IBM--has vowed to fight the verdict of a federal jury that affirmed that the company's Internet Explorer browser violated the IP rights of a smaller ISV.

On Monday, a federal jury in Chicago agreed that IE violated an existing patent and awarded $521 million to the University of California and Chicago-based Eolas Technologies, which originally asked for $1.2 billion in damages. Eolas' founders were researchers at the University of California when they filed for the patent.

Microsoft denied that it violated the patent and said it will appeal the ruling to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

A spokesman for Microsoft pointed out that the court ruled earlier that the company had not willfully infringed upon Eolas' patent, which allows customers to access interactive programs in Web pages. That feature was included in the Internet Explorer browser in Windows.

"While today's outcome is disappointing, we do plan to appeal this decision and we are confident the facts will support our position," the company said in a statement Monday. "It's important to note that the court has already rejected claims that there was any willful infringement. We believe the evidence will ultimately show that there was no infringement of any kind, and that the accused feature in our browser technology was developed by our own engineers based on pre-existing Microsoft technology."

Microsoft has backed SCO's IP case against IBM and has charged that some of the open-source technology making its way into Linux is covered by patents owned by SCO, as well as other vendors including Microsoft.

Microsoft's statement yesterday indicated that the company plans to fight the ruling and protect the interests of its many Windows customers that use IE.

"As an intellectual property company, Microsoft invests heavily in research and development, and is committed to respecting the intellectual property rights of others," the statement said. "Microsoft stands by its products and will continue to develop innovative technologies that benefit consumers. Regardless of the ultimate outcome of this case, Microsoft will work hard to ensure that there is very little if any impact on our customers."


 

 TalkBack  
Subject Replies Thread Author Date of
latest post
impact 0   Arthur B. 8/12/2003 7:25:36 PM
  Latest reply, by Arthur B.:
Patient Infringement and Microsoft 1   Paul 8/12/2003 5:07:32 PM
Latest Response: Gates reported selling 1 million shares of Microsoft Common stock on the Friday before the ruling.....hmmm..
 
CMP Media LLC (CMP) and its sites: www.crn.com, www.varbusiness.com and www.channelweb.com provide Talk Back discussion boards as a professional medium for solution providers to discuss business problems. Gossip, personal attacks and unsubstantiated charges are prohibited.

Messages posted on this Web site as discussion threads or talkback (Content) are solely the opinions of their creators and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of CMP Media LLC (CMP) or its sites: www.crn.com, www.varbusiness.com and www.channelweb.com. All individuals who post material to this Web site are solely responsible for all Content that they upload, post or otherwise transmit via the Web Site.

CMP cannot vouch for the authenticity of the user or company names or e-mail addresses associated with posted messages. Messages are posted as is, that is they are neither edited for content nor checked for accuracy or authenticity. Under no circumstances will CMP Media LLC or ChannelWeb be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not limited to, for any errors or omissions in any Content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content posted or otherwise transmitted via the Bulletin Boards.

CMP reserves the exclusive right to edit or remove messages containing inappropriate language or other material that could be construed as libelous, potentially libelous, or otherwise offensive or inappropriate. Discussion forums, bulletin boards and chat facilities are provided by CMP solely for the convenience of those who make use of the service. CMP does not endorse the products and services or other offerings mentioned in messages.

 






Privacy Statement - Copyright © 2004 CMP Media LLC - Terms of Service