Ohio ex rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park Dist.

281 US 74, 50 S. Ct. 228, 74 L. Ed. 710 - Supreme Court, 1930 - Google Scholar
BRYANT v. AKRON METROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT ET AL … US 118; O'Neill v. Leamer, 239
US 244, 248; State of Ohio ex rel … The opportunity afforded to litigants in Ohio to contest all …

State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward

… Ohio St. 3d 451, 715 NE 2d 1062, 1999 Ohio … - Ohio: Supreme …, 1999 - Google Scholar
… [4] While the General Assembly and former Governor Voinovich … circumstances when the public
injury by its refusal will be serious.'" (Emphasis added.) Id., 66 Ohio St … In State ex rel …

State ex rel. Bray v. Russell

89 Ohio St. 3d 132, 729 NE 2d 359 - Ohio: Supreme Court, 2000 - Google Scholar
Bryant v. Akron Metro. Park Dist. (1929), 120 Ohio St … Id. Until today, Ohio cases reflected
the Nixon sort of analysis. In State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co …

Terry v. Ohio

392 US 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 - Supreme Court, 1968 - Google Scholar
… the people would be `secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,' only in the discretion
of the police." Beck v. Ohio, supra, at … The former, although justified in part by the …

State ex rel. Mill Creek Metro. Park Dist. Bd. of Commrs. v. Tablack

86 Ohio St. 3d 293, 714 NE 2d 917, 1999 Ohio … - Ohio: Supreme …, 1999 - Google Scholar
… and treasurer had no duty to collect Park District taxes on real estate in … challenged affidavits were
not based on the personal knowledge of the afflants, State ex rel … 1994), 69 Ohio St.3d …

Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson

316 US 535, 62 S. Ct. 1110, 86 L. Ed. 1655 - Supreme Court, 1942 - Google Scholar
SKINNER v. OKLAHOMA EX REL … See Bryant v. Zimmerman, 278 US 63, and cases cited … And
so I think the real question we have to consider is not one of equal protection, but whether …

Baker v. Carr

369 US 186, 82 S. Ct. 691, 7 L. Ed. 2d 663 - Supreme Court, 1962 - Google Scholar
… of the Indian require his release from [the … workmen's compensation violates republican government
held nonjusticiable); Ohio ex rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park District, 281 US …

Batson v. Kentucky

476 US 79, 106 S. Ct. 1712, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69 - Supreme Court, 1986 - Google Scholar
… governed by the rule of law." Akron v. Akron Center for … The former singles out the excluded group,
while individuals of … danger of convicting the innocent." Tehan v. United States ex rel …

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

411 US 792, 93 S. Ct. 1817, 36 L. Ed. 2d 668 - Supreme Court, 1973 - Google Scholar
… [2] As part of this … The District Judge described the plan for, and respondent's participation in, the
"stall-in" as … 42 USC §§ 2000e-2 (a) (1) and 2000e-3 (a). [4] The former section generally …

Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins

304 US 64, 58 S. Ct. 817, 82 L. Ed. 1188 - Supreme Court, 1938 - Google Scholar
… also a Kentucky corporation, wished that the former should have … mineral conveyances, [16] and
even devises of real estate [17 … 149 US 368, 401, against ignoring the Ohio common law …